Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Hydraulic
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Selecting actuators is a core engineering decision in robotics, heavy machinery, and industrial automation. Power density, control responsiveness, cost, noise, and maintainability all matter. This question probes practical engineering knowledge about the trade-offs between electric, hydraulic, and pneumatic actuation, with an emphasis on real-world maintenance and cleanliness.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Hydraulic systems use pressurized incompressible fluids, enabling very high force and power density for a given actuator size. However, hydraulic fluid can leak at seals, fittings, and hoses, leading to oil spills, contamination, and frequent cleanup. Pneumatic systems use compressed air—cleaner but with lower achievable forces for similar package sizes—and electric motors are clean and increasingly powerful but may require complex gearing for very high torques.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Industry practice confirms that heavy excavators, presses, and high-force robotics rely on hydraulics; maintenance logs commonly include seal replacements and cleanup procedures due to oil leakage risks.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Electric: Clean operation, growing power capabilities, but not characteristically 'messy.'
Pneumatic: Usually cleaner than hydraulics; power density is lower for equivalent sizes.
Hydraulic and Pneumatic: Pneumatics are not generally 'messy' in the same sense.
None: Incorrect because hydraulics fit.
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming 'messy' refers to noise (pneumatics can be noisy, but not oily) or ignoring the power-density contrast.
Final Answer:
Hydraulic
Discussion & Comments