Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: 10 to 15 kL/m2/hr
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:Rapid sand filters (RSF) are widely used in municipal plants for turbidity removal after coagulation–flocculation and sedimentation. Their hallmark is a comparatively high filtration rate versus slow sand filters.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Standard design guidance places RSF rates roughly in the 5–15 m/h band; many plants adopt 10–15 m/h for balanced performance and run time between backwashes.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Recognize RSF are designed for higher throughput than slow sand filters.2) Convert units: kL/m2/hr is numerically equal to m/h.3) Select the band aligning with common practice: 10–15 kL/m2/hr.Verification / Alternative check:Check headloss buildup and effluent turbidity; design manuals cite similar ranges for conventional RSF.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
0.1–1: too low; typical of slow sand filters.3–6: low for RSF; used in some specialized media.15–20 or 25–40: too high for standard RSF; risk turbidity breakthrough.Common Pitfalls:Confusing RSF with slow sand rates; ignoring unit equivalence; overdriving filters causing short runs.
Final Answer:10 to 15 kL/m2/hr
Discussion & Comments