Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: both (a) and (b)
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:Before committing significant resources, organizations prepare a study project proposal (sometimes called a pre-feasibility or terms-of-reference document). It justifies undertaking a detailed feasibility study by outlining expected benefits and the cost of the study itself, ensuring prudent governance and budget control.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:A sound study project proposal includes an initial benefits hypothesis (e.g., profit improvement, cost savings, risk reduction) and a budget for conducting the feasibility work (analysts’ time, stakeholder workshops, tool licenses, data collection). This combination enables a go/no-go decision based on expected value versus the cost of investigation.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Summarize the envisioned MIS impact (profit, service, compliance).Estimate time and expense to perform the feasibility study.Present both so management can authorize or defer the study.Verification / Alternative check:Project governance standards (stage-gate, PRINCE2, PMBOK) call for an initial business case and an estimate of the cost to develop the full business case—mirroring (a) and (b).
Why Other Options Are Wrong:Choosing only (a) or only (b) omits necessary information for sponsorship; “neither” is incorrect because proposals routinely contain both.
Common Pitfalls:Inflated benefit claims without evidence; underestimating study costs; failing to define scope boundaries and success criteria for the feasibility phase.
Final Answer: both (a) and (b)
Discussion & Comments