Question 1

Which country was selected to host the 2020 Summer Olympic Games?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Host cities and host countries of major multi sport events like the Summer Olympic Games are regular topics in general knowledge and current affairs exams. The 2020 Summer Olympics were awarded to a major Asian country well known for its advanced infrastructure and previous experience in hosting global sports events. This question checks whether you remember which nation was chosen as the host country for the 2020 Summer Olympics. Given Data / Assumptions: • The event is the 2020 edition of the Summer Olympic Games. • We are asked about the host country, not just the host city. • You must select one correct nation from the given options. Concept / Approach: The International Olympic Committee selects host cities several years in advance. For the 2020 Summer Olympics, the chosen city was Tokyo, which automatically implies that the host country was Japan. Tokyo had previously hosted the Summer Olympics in 1964, making it a familiar venue for the Games. Thus, knowing the host city makes it straightforward to identify the host country for this question. Step-by-Step Solution: • Step 1: Recall that the 2020 Summer Olympics were scheduled to be held in Tokyo. • Step 2: Identify Tokyo as the capital city of Japan. • Step 3: Recognize that if Tokyo is the host city, the host country is Japan. • Step 4: Compare the options China, South Korea, Canada and Japan. • Step 5: Choose Japan as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify this by remembering the official Tokyo 2020 branding, logos and the heavy media coverage around the event. Promotional material, ticketing information and qualification tournaments all referred to the Games as Tokyo 2020 hosted by Japan. Additionally, any standard sports almanac or official Olympic website clearly lists the 2020 Summer Olympics as being hosted in Tokyo, Japan, confirming Japan as the correct host nation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • China: Hosted the 2008 Beijing Olympics, not the 2020 edition. • South Korea: Hosted the 1988 Seoul Summer Olympics and the 2018 PyeongChang Winter Olympics, but not the 2020 Summer Games. • Canada: Hosted the 1976 Montreal Summer Olympics and 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympics, but not the 2020 Games. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes mix up various Olympic host countries, especially among Asian nations like China, Japan and South Korea. Others may confuse the Summer and Winter Olympics, leading them to recall the wrong host city and country. To avoid such mistakes, it is useful to memorize a simple timeline of recent Olympics: Beijing 2008, London 2012, Rio 2016 and Tokyo 2020. Once you recall Tokyo, identifying Japan as the host country becomes straightforward. Final Answer: The 2020 Summer Olympics were awarded to Japan.

Question 2

Regarding major sports events and results, which of the following 2017 statements is correct?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question combines three different sports events from 2017 to test your detailed awareness of international badminton and tennis results. Such multi statement questions require you to carefully evaluate each statement instead of guessing based on partial memory. Knowing which host country organized a championship, and which players won specific tennis titles, helps you eliminate incorrect statements and identify the only correct one. Given Data / Assumptions: • Statement A claims that the United Arab Emirates hosted the Badminton 2017 BWF World Senior Championships. • Statement B claims that Johanna Konta won the Tennis 2017 Miami Open Women Singles title. • Statement C claims that Grigor Dimitrov won the Tennis 2017 US Open Men Singles title. • The task is to determine which combination of these statements is correct. Concept / Approach: For multi statement sports questions, treat each statement like a separate true or false claim. Check the host city and country for the badminton event, then verify the winners of the mentioned tennis tournaments. After you know which statements are true, choose the option that accurately describes the set of correct statements. This structured approach is safer than relying on a vague memory of one name or venue. Step-by-Step Solution: • Step 1: Evaluate Statement A. The 2017 BWF World Senior Championships were hosted in Kochi, India, not in the United Arab Emirates. Therefore, Statement A is false. • Step 2: Evaluate Statement B. In 2017, Johanna Konta did indeed win the Women Singles title at the Miami Open tennis tournament, making Statement B true. • Step 3: Evaluate Statement C. The 2017 US Open Men Singles champion was Rafael Nadal, not Grigor Dimitrov, so Statement C is false. • Step 4: Summarize the truth values: A is false, B is true, and C is false. • Step 5: From the options, the combination that matches this evaluation is “Only statement B is correct”. Verification / Alternative check: To verify, you can cross check major sports results summaries for 2017. Lists of badminton world championships clearly place the World Senior Championships in Kochi, India. Tennis records for the Miami Open confirm Johanna Konta as the women singles winner that year. Similarly, official Grand Slam records show Rafael Nadal as the men singles champion at the US Open 2017, not Grigor Dimitrov. When all three independent sources are considered, only Statement B aligns with reality. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • Only statement C is correct: This would require Dimitrov to have won the US Open 2017, which did not happen. • Statements B and C are both correct: This assumes C is true, but it is clearly false based on official records. • Statements A, B and C are all correct: This would mean all three claims are true, which is impossible given the incorrect host country and incorrect US Open winner. Common Pitfalls: Learners sometimes focus on only one familiar name, such as Johanna Konta or Grigor Dimitrov, and assume all statements mentioning familiar names must be correct. Another mistake is confusing different badminton tournaments or confusing the various tennis Masters events and Grand Slams. A disciplined approach is to check each statement independently and remember that even if one part of a statement is wrong, the entire statement is considered false. Final Answer: The only accurate statement among the three is Statement B, so the correct answer is Only statement B is correct.

Question 3

For the listed 2017 sports facts, which combination of statements is correct?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks detailed knowledge about cricket and Formula One motor racing in the 2017 season and the 2018 IPL auctions. You are given three statements that mention an IPL retention decision and two Formula One related facts. Multi statement questions like this are common in exams because they test both factual memory and careful reading, forcing you to evaluate each statement instead of guessing blindly. Given Data / Assumptions: • Statement A: In the 2018 IPL auctions, Delhi Daredevils retained Rishabh Pant. • Statement B: In 2017, Daniel Ricciardo raced in Formula One for Red Bull Racing. • Statement C: Lewis Hamilton won the Formula One 2017 Malaysian Grand Prix. • You must identify which combination of A, B and C is correct. Concept / Approach: The strategy is to treat each statement as a separate true or false proposition. First, recall IPL retention lists from the 2018 auction. Second, remember which team Daniel Ricciardo drove for during the 2017 Formula One season. Third, verify the winner of the 2017 Malaysian Grand Prix. After you have the truth value of each statement, select the option that accurately reflects the set of true statements. Step-by-Step Solution: • Step 1: Evaluate Statement A. In the 2018 IPL auctions, Delhi Daredevils indeed retained Rishabh Pant as one of their key young players. Therefore, Statement A is true. • Step 2: Evaluate Statement B. In the 2017 Formula One season, Daniel Ricciardo drove for the Red Bull Racing team. Hence, Statement B is also true. • Step 3: Evaluate Statement C. The 2017 Malaysian Grand Prix was actually won by Max Verstappen, not Lewis Hamilton. So Statement C is false. • Step 4: Summarize: A is true, B is true, and C is false. • Step 5: Among the options, “Statements A and B are correct” exactly matches this evaluation. Verification / Alternative check: For cricket, you can confirm from IPL records that Delhi retained Rishabh Pant before the 2018 season. For Formula One, season summaries list Daniel Ricciardo as a Red Bull Racing driver in 2017. Results for the Malaysian Grand Prix show Max Verstappen as the winner, while Lewis Hamilton finished behind him. These independent records confirm that A and B are true and C is false, validating the chosen option. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • Only statement A is correct: This ignores the fact that Statement B is also true. • Statements A and C are correct: This wrongly treats Statement C as true even though Verstappen, not Hamilton, won the Malaysian Grand Prix. • Statements B and C are correct: Here again, C is incorrectly assumed to be true. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to assume that Lewis Hamilton won most Formula One races in 2017 and therefore must have won the Malaysian Grand Prix as well. Another pitfall is not paying attention to specific years. Drivers sometimes change teams, and IPL squads change after each auction. Always confirm the year and event mentioned in the statement before deciding whether it is true or false. Final Answer: The correct combination is that Statements A and B are true, so the answer is Statements A and B are correct.

Question 4

For the listed 2017 football, chess and IPL facts, which of the statements is correct?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests detailed knowledge across three different sports domains in 2017 and 2018: chess, Premier League football and the Indian Premier League. It presents three statements and asks which of them, if any, are correct. Multi statement questions like this are very useful for assessing how carefully you recall facts about winners, clubs and team retentions, and they require systematic evaluation of each statement. Given Data / Assumptions: • Statement A: An Indian Grandmaster won the 2017 Chess World Cup. • Statement B: In 2017, Roberto Firmino played for the Premier League team Leicester City. • Statement C: In the 2018 IPL auctions, Rajasthan Royals retained MS Dhoni. • Your task is to identify whether any of these statements are true. Concept / Approach: The best approach is to evaluate each statement independently. First, check who actually won the 2017 Chess World Cup. Second, recall which club Roberto Firmino played for in the Premier League during 2017. Third, verify which IPL franchise retained MS Dhoni in the 2018 auction cycle. Once you know the truth value of each statement, you can determine whether any of them is correct and choose the matching option. Step-by-Step Solution: • Step 1: Evaluate Statement A. The 2017 Chess World Cup was won by Levon Aronian of Armenia, not by an Indian Grandmaster. Therefore, Statement A is false. • Step 2: Evaluate Statement B. In 2017, Roberto Firmino played in the English Premier League for Liverpool, not Leicester City, making Statement B false. • Step 3: Evaluate Statement C. MS Dhoni has been associated with Chennai Super Kings. In the 2018 IPL auctions, he was retained by Chennai Super Kings, not by Rajasthan Royals, so Statement C is false. • Step 4: Summarize the evaluation: A, B and C are all false. • Step 5: The option that correctly captures this is “None of the statements is correct”. Verification / Alternative check: You can cross check chess records to see Levon Aronian recognized as the 2017 Chess World Cup champion. Football databases list Roberto Firmino as a Liverpool forward during that period. IPL documentation for 2018 retentions clearly shows that Chennai Super Kings retained MS Dhoni, Suresh Raina and Ravindra Jadeja, not Rajasthan Royals. Together, these independent data points confirm that all three statements in the question are incorrect. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • Only statement A is correct: This would require an Indian Grandmaster to have won the 2017 Chess World Cup, which is not the case. • Only statement B is correct: This incorrectly places Roberto Firmino at Leicester City. • Only statement C is correct: This wrongly claims that Rajasthan Royals retained MS Dhoni, which never happened. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake is to assume that because India has strong chess players, one of them must have won the Chess World Cup. Similarly, casual football followers might confuse Leicester City, famous for its title win, with Liverpool. In cricket, learners sometimes mix up which IPL franchise retained which star players. These errors show why it is important to rely on verified facts rather than assumptions based on reputation or popularity. Final Answer: All three statements are incorrect, so the correct choice is None of the statements is correct.

Question 5

Considering Premier League and tennis results, which of the following 2017 statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question blends knowledge from Premier League football, the Indian Premier League and professional tennis to test your multi sport awareness. You are given three factual statements and asked to determine which combination of them is accurate. Such questions are common in general knowledge sections because they reward candidates who follow sports news across different disciplines and can separate truth from partial or completely wrong statements. Given Data / Assumptions: • Statement A: In 2017, Gary Cahill captained the Premier League team Arsenal. • Statement B: In the 2018 IPL auctions, Kolkata Knight Riders retained Sunil Narine. • Statement C: Roger Federer won the Tennis 2017 Wimbledon Championships Men Singles title. • The task is to choose the option that matches the correct statements. Concept / Approach: The key is to check each statement individually against known sports records. For Statement A, recall which club Gary Cahill played for and captained. For Statement B, verify which players Kolkata Knight Riders retained in the 2018 IPL auction process. For Statement C, recall the men singles champion at Wimbledon in 2017. Once each statement is classified as true or false, select the option that reflects that combination. Step-by-Step Solution: • Step 1: Evaluate Statement A. Gary Cahill has been associated with Chelsea, not Arsenal, and he captained Chelsea, not Arsenal. Hence, Statement A is false. • Step 2: Evaluate Statement B. Kolkata Knight Riders did retain Sunil Narine as a key all rounder in the 2018 IPL auctions, so Statement B is true. • Step 3: Evaluate Statement C. Roger Federer won the men singles title at Wimbledon in 2017, extending his record of Grand Slam victories. Therefore, Statement C is true. • Step 4: Combine the evaluations: A is false, B is true and C is true. • Step 5: From the options, the only one that fits is “Statements B and C are correct”. Verification / Alternative check: Football records from the English Premier League list Gary Cahill as a defender and captain for Chelsea during that period, confirming that he did not captain Arsenal. IPL retention lists from 2018 clearly show KKR retaining Sunil Narine. Tennis Grand Slam histories document that Federer lifted the Wimbledon trophy again in 2017, underlining the correctness of Statement C. Together, these independent confirmations prove that B and C are correct and A is not. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • Only statement B is correct: This neglects the fact that Statement C is also true. • Statements A, B and C are all correct: This would require Statement A to be true, which it is not. • None of these statements is correct: This incorrectly treats both B and C as false. Common Pitfalls: Some learners confuse English clubs such as Arsenal and Chelsea, especially when players from both clubs have appeared in high profile matches. Others may remember Federer long dominance at Wimbledon but forget the exact year of particular titles. It is also easy to mix up IPL retention and auction purchases. Taking the time to recall the specific team, year and tournament for each statement helps avoid these typical mistakes. Final Answer: The accurate evaluation is that Statements B and C are true, so the correct answer is Statements B and C are correct.

Question 6

In which sport did India win a bronze medal at the Rio 2016 Olympic Games?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: India medal winners at the Rio 2016 Olympics are frequently asked in competitive exams because they represent important milestones in Indian sports history. While one medal was silver and the other was bronze, this question focuses specifically on the sport in which the bronze medal was won. Remembering the athletes names and their disciplines is the key to solving this straightforward general knowledge question. Given Data / Assumptions: • The event is the Rio 2016 Olympic Games. • India won a bronze medal there. • You need to identify the sport related to that bronze medal. Concept / Approach: At Rio 2016, India won two medals: a silver in badminton and a bronze in wrestling. The silver medal was won by P V Sindhu in badminton women singles, while the bronze was won by Sakshi Malik in women wrestling. By associating Sakshi Malik with wrestling, you can immediately identify that the bronze medal came from wrestling and choose the correct option. Step-by-Step Solution: • Step 1: Recall that P V Sindhu won a silver medal in badminton at Rio 2016. • Step 2: Recall that Sakshi Malik won a bronze medal at the same Olympics. • Step 3: Identify Sakshi Malik as a wrestler representing India in women freestyle wrestling. • Step 4: Therefore, the bronze medal was in the sport of wrestling, not badminton. • Step 5: From the options, select wrestling as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify by checking any reliable sports news archive or Olympic record for Rio 2016. These sources clearly show that Sakshi Malik became the first Indian woman wrestler to win an Olympic medal when she claimed bronze. They also show that India did not win medals in boxing or hockey at those Games. This confirmation firmly links the bronze medal to wrestling and removes any doubt. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • Badminton: India did win a medal in badminton, but it was a silver, not a bronze. • Boxing: Indian boxers participated but did not secure any medal at Rio 2016. • Hockey: The men hockey team qualified for the quarterfinals, but no medal was won. Common Pitfalls: A typical error is to remember that P V Sindhu and Sakshi Malik both won medals, but not recall which was silver and which was bronze. Some learners also confuse older Olympic hockey successes with recent performances. To avoid these mistakes, associate each individual athlete with both their sport and the color of their medal, creating a complete mental picture of the achievement. Final Answer: India bronze medal at Rio 2016 was in the sport of Wrestling.

Question 7

For the listed 2017 motor sport and golf events, which statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question combines information from MotoGP motorcycle racing, professional golf and Formula One motor racing. It presents three detailed statements about winners of specific 2017 events and asks you to identify whether any of them are correct. Such questions are designed to reward precise knowledge of who won which event, rather than just vague familiarity with famous names in the sports world. Given Data / Assumptions: • Statement A: Dani Pedrosa won the 2017 Qatar Motorcycle Grand Prix MotoGP. • Statement B: Bernhard Langer won the Golf 2017 BMW PGA Championship. • Statement C: Dustin Johnson won the Formula One 2017 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix. • You must decide which combination of these statements, if any, is correct. Concept / Approach: The method is to evaluate each statement on its own merits. First, determine who actually won the MotoGP race in Qatar in 2017. Second, check the winner of the BMW PGA Championship in golf that year. Third, remember that Formula One events are won by racing drivers, not golfers, and identify who really won the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix. Once the truth value of each statement is known, select the option that faithfully reflects those values. Step-by-Step Solution: • Step 1: Evaluate Statement A. The 2017 Qatar MotoGP was won by Maverick Vinales, not Dani Pedrosa, so Statement A is false. • Step 2: Evaluate Statement B. The 2017 BMW PGA Championship golf title went to Alex Noren, not Bernhard Langer. Therefore, Statement B is false. • Step 3: Evaluate Statement C. Formula One races are contested by F1 drivers. Dustin Johnson is a professional golfer, so he could not have won the 2017 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix. The actual winner was Valtteri Bottas, so Statement C is false. • Step 4: Summarize: A is false, B is false and C is false. • Step 5: The option that matches this result is “None of these statements is correct”. Verification / Alternative check: Official MotoGP records name Maverick Vinales as the Qatar race winner in 2017. Golf tournament records list Alex Noren as the BMW PGA Championship winner that year. Formula One season statistics show Valtteri Bottas as the winner of the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix, while Dustin Johnson appears only in golf leaderboards, not in motor racing. These independent records confirm that all three given statements are incorrect. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • Only statement B is correct: This treats Bernhard Langer as the BMW PGA winner, which is inaccurate. • Statements B and C are correct: This wrongly assumes both a golf result and a Formula One result are true. • Statements A, B and C are all correct: This would require all three events to have been won by the named people, which contradicts official data. Common Pitfalls: Students may recognize famous names like Dani Pedrosa, Bernhard Langer and Dustin Johnson and assume that any statement featuring them must be correct. Others may not notice that a golfer is being incorrectly linked to a Formula One race. Always look beyond the familiarity of names and focus on whether the person named is logically connected to the sport and event in question for the specific year. Final Answer: Since all three statements are false, the correct answer is None of these statements is correct.

Question 8

The Sultan Johor Cup is a tournament associated with which sport?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Sultan Johor Cup is a well known international under age tournament that regularly appears in sports news and general knowledge questions. It is named after the Sultan of Johor and is organized in Johor Bahru, Malaysia. Knowing which sport this cup is associated with is important for exam aspirants, especially those preparing for questions related to international sports events and youth competitions. Given Data / Assumptions: • The event name given is the Sultan Johor Cup. • It is an organized competitive tournament. • You must identify the correct sport from the options. Concept / Approach: The Sultan Johor Cup is linked to field hockey, specifically an under 21 international tournament often involving leading junior teams such as India and other top hockey nations. It is not a cricket, football or golf event. Associating the word “cup” alone with a sport is not enough because many sports have cups. Instead, you must rely on your memory of which sport actually uses the Sultan Johor Cup branding in global calendars. Step-by-Step Solution: • Step 1: Recall reading news about the Sultan Johor Cup involving junior hockey teams from countries like India, Australia and others. • Step 2: Notice that these reports mention matches being played on a hockey field with standard hockey equipment. • Step 3: Confirm that there is no prominent international cricket, football or golf tournament by this name. • Step 4: Eliminate cricket, football and golf as incorrect options. • Step 5: Choose hockey as the sport associated with the Sultan Johor Cup. Verification / Alternative check: You can verify by checking sports schedules or news archives that consistently describe the Sultan Johor Cup as an under 21 field hockey tournament held annually in Johor Bahru. Results tables list junior national hockey teams, and match reports describe goals, penalty corners and other hockey specific details. No credible source associates the Sultan Johor Cup with cricket, football or golf, which confirms the correctness of the hockey association. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • Cricket: While many cricket cups exist, none of the major tournaments is known as the Sultan Johor Cup. • Football: International football tournaments usually have different names and organizing bodies; the Sultan Johor Cup is not one of them. • Golf: Golf events often include sponsor names and words like Masters or Open; Sultan Johor Cup is not a recognized golf title. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates guess cricket or football whenever they see a cup name because these sports are highly visible and widely followed. Others may not pay attention to youth categories and mistakenly assume the cup is linked to senior professional leagues. To avoid these errors, try to remember at least one specific example of India participation in the Sultan Johor Cup as a junior hockey competition. Final Answer: The Sultan Johor Cup is associated with the sport of Hockey.

Question 9

Limba Ram, a noted Indian sportsperson, is associated with which sport?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Questions about famous Indian sportspersons and their respective sports are very common in general knowledge exams. Limba Ram is one such athlete who gained recognition for representing India at the international level. Knowing his discipline helps you answer a wide range of sports related questions and also gives you insight into India history in less publicized sports beyond cricket. Given Data / Assumptions: • The sportsperson in question is Limba Ram. • He is known for representing India internationally. • You must select the correct sport from the given options. Concept / Approach: Limba Ram is best known as an Indian archer. He represented India in multiple Olympic Games and Asian events and set national and international records in archery. While the other options, such as javelin throw, cricket and badminton, are popular sports in India, they are not the disciplines in which Limba Ram made his name. Recognizing his connection with archery allows you to choose the correct option quickly. Step-by-Step Solution: • Step 1: Recall that Limba Ram name appears in the context of precision sports and target events. • Step 2: Remember that he competed in events involving bows and arrows, which are characteristic of archery. • Step 3: Think of India Olympic archers and note that Limba Ram is frequently mentioned among them. • Step 4: Compare this with the options javelin throw, cricket and badminton, which do not match his profile. • Step 5: Conclude that archery is the correct sport associated with Limba Ram. Verification / Alternative check: If you refer to standard sports reference books or reliable online biographies, you will find Limba Ram described as an Indian archer who participated in several Olympic Games and international competitions. He is often cited as one of the pioneers of competitive archery in India. There are no records of him competing internationally in javelin throw, cricket or badminton, which clearly confirms that archery is his sport. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • Javelin throw: This option may remind you of other Indian athletes, but it has no connection to Limba Ram. • Cricket: Limba Ram is not known as a cricketer; cricket legends come from entirely different backgrounds. • Badminton: India has produced top badminton players, but Limba Ram is not among them. Common Pitfalls: One pitfall is assuming that most internationally known Indian sportspersons are cricketers, and therefore picking cricket by default. Another is confusing Limba Ram with other athletes who have gained fame in javelin or badminton. To avoid these mistakes, build a habit of associating each name with a clear mental picture of the equipment and events they are connected with; in this case, Limba Ram with bow and arrow in archery. Final Answer: Limba Ram is associated with the sport of Archery.

Question 10

Which person was appointed as the new coach of the Indian national cricket team by the BCCI at that time?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Coaching appointments for the Indian national cricket team receive huge media attention and often become important current affairs questions. At a particular time during the mid 2010s, the Board of Control for Cricket in India, commonly known as the BCCI, appointed a former legendary Indian bowler as the head coach of the national side. This question checks whether you remember which of the listed personalities was chosen as the coach then. Given Data / Assumptions: • The focus is on an appointment as the coach of the Indian national cricket team. • The appointing authority is the BCCI. • The names given include Sourav Ganguly, Anil Kumble, Rahul Dravid and S. R. Kulkarni. Concept / Approach: Among the given names, Anil Kumble, a legendary Indian leg spinner, was officially appointed head coach of the Indian team by the BCCI around 2016. While Sourav Ganguly and Rahul Dravid have also been involved with Indian cricket in various roles, at that specific time it was Anil Kumble who held the formal head coach position. Recognizing the timeline of appointments and the key role played by Kumble in that period leads you directly to the correct answer. Step-by-Step Solution: • Step 1: Recall that the BCCI conducted an application and interview process to select a new head coach for India. • Step 2: Remember that Anil Kumble was chosen after this process and took charge as the head coach. • Step 3: Note that Sourav Ganguly and Rahul Dravid have mostly served in other capacities, such as team mentors, under 19 coaching and administration roles. • Step 4: Recognize that S. R. Kulkarni is not known as a national team head coach. • Step 5: Conclude that among the options, Anil Kumble is the person who was appointed as the new coach by the BCCI. Verification / Alternative check: Media coverage from that time, including press conferences and official BCCI announcements, introduced Anil Kumble as the head coach of the Indian cricket team. Match broadcasts during his tenure often showed him in the dressing room and on the field interacting with players in that capacity. In contrast, Sourav Ganguly and Rahul Dravid were publicly linked to board roles and junior team coaching roles respectively. These observations confirm that the correct answer is Anil Kumble. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • Sourav Ganguly: He has been BCCI President and a former captain, but not the head coach at that time. • Rahul Dravid: He served as coach of junior and India A teams and later as senior team coach, but at the time referred to in this question, it was Kumble who had the appointment. • S. R. Kulkarni: Not associated with the role of head coach of the Indian national cricket team. Common Pitfalls: Examinees often confuse different coaching and administrative roles due to the high profile careers of Ganguly and Dravid. Another pitfall is assuming that a great batsman or captain must automatically have been the coach at some point. To avoid errors, remember the specific timeline when Anil Kumble, the former leg spinner, was formally appointed head coach by the BCCI. Final Answer: The person appointed as the new coach of the Indian national cricket team by the BCCI was Anil Kumble.

Question 11

K. Srikanth received the Arjuna Award for excellence in which sport?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Arjuna Award is one of India most prestigious sports honours, given to athletes for outstanding performance in their respective fields. K. Srikanth is a widely recognized Indian sportsperson who has achieved significant international success. This question asks you to recall the sport in which he excelled and for which he received the Arjuna Award, a staple type of question in sports general knowledge sections. Given Data / Assumptions: • The athlete in question is K. Srikanth. • He has been conferred the Arjuna Award. • You must identify the correct sport from the options given. Concept / Approach: K. Srikanth is known globally as a top Indian badminton player, especially in men singles. He has won multiple international titles and reached high rankings in the Badminton World Federation list. The other sports listed, such as billiards, boxing and chess, are unrelated to his achievements. Knowing that he plays badminton at the international level allows you to confidently pick badminton as the correct answer. Step-by-Step Solution: • Step 1: Recall that K. Srikanth name is usually mentioned along with other Indian badminton stars like P. V. Sindhu and Saina Nehwal. • Step 2: Remember his victories in international badminton tournaments and his high world ranking. • Step 3: Note that he competes in men singles badminton events, not in cue sports, boxing rings or chess tournaments. • Step 4: Match this memory with the options and identify badminton as the associated sport. • Step 5: Select badminton as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Sports awards lists and news coverage about the Arjuna Award clearly describe K. Srikanth as a badminton player. They highlight his achievements on the BWF circuit and his contribution to Indian badminton. No official record links him to billiards, boxing or chess at the international level. This consistent description in multiple reliable sources confirms that badminton is the sport for which he received the Arjuna Award. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • Billiards: India has produced champions in this cue sport, but K. Srikanth is not one of them. • Boxing: This sport is associated with other Indian Arjuna awardees, but not with Srikanth. • Chess: Famous Indian chess players include Viswanathan Anand and others, not K. Srikanth. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may confuse K. Srikanth with athletes from other sports because they focus only on the name and not on context. Others may attempt to guess based on which sport appears most often in exams. To avoid such mistakes, build a solid association between each name and their specific sport. For K. Srikanth, always visualize badminton courts, racquets and shuttlecocks. Final Answer: K. Srikanth received the Arjuna Award for his achievements in Badminton.

Question 12

Kevin Durant is a famous professional player in which international sport?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Kevin Durant is one of the most prominent athletes in modern international sports, especially known for his performances in North American professional leagues and for representing his country at the Olympics. Questions about which sport a famous athlete plays are common in general knowledge exams because they require basic but accurate awareness of global sports stars. This question asks you to correctly associate Kevin Durant with his sport. Given Data / Assumptions: • The athlete named is Kevin Durant. • He participates in an international sport. • The options are golf, baseball, basketball and boxing. Concept / Approach: Kevin Durant is a widely known basketball player who has played in the National Basketball Association and has represented the United States in international basketball competitions, including the Olympic Games. The other sports listed in the options are popular in different contexts but are not connected with Durant career. Recognizing his association with specific NBA teams and the USA basketball team leads you directly to basketball as the correct answer. Step-by-Step Solution: • Step 1: Recall that Kevin Durant is frequently mentioned in discussions about NBA scoring leaders and championship teams. • Step 2: Visualize him playing on a basketball court, wearing jerseys of teams like the Golden State Warriors, Oklahoma City Thunder and Brooklyn Nets. • Step 3: Note that he is often seen dribbling and shooting a basketball, not swinging a golf club, baseball bat or boxing in a ring. • Step 4: Match this mental picture with the options given. • Step 5: Select basketball as the sport in which Kevin Durant plays professionally. Verification / Alternative check: Any reliable sports news outlet, player profile or NBA statistics page identifies Kevin Durant as a professional basketball player. They mention his points per game, rebounds, assists and championship titles in the NBA as well as his contributions to USA basketball in international tournaments. There are no records of him competing professionally in golf, baseball or boxing, which confirms that basketball is the only correct choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • Golf: Although many famous golfers exist, Kevin Durant is not among them. • Baseball: This sport has its own stars, but Durant is not a baseball player. • Boxing: Kevin Durant is not a boxer; boxing champions come from entirely different backgrounds. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may not closely follow American sports and might confuse Kevin Durant with athletes from other sports due to name familiarity. Others might guess randomly if they only have a vague idea that he is an American sports star. To avoid such confusion, remember that many top NBA players, including Durant, also win Olympic gold medals in basketball, reinforcing the link between his name and the sport. Final Answer: Kevin Durant is an internationally famous player in Basketball.

Question 13

Which city was chosen as the venue for the 2020 Summer Olympic Games?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Knowing the host cities of recent Summer Olympic Games is a key part of sports and current affairs general knowledge. The 2020 Summer Olympics were awarded to a major city in Asia that had also hosted the Games in the past. This question asks you to recall which city was selected as the official venue for the 2020 edition of the Games, a fact frequently asked in exams. Given Data / Assumptions: • The focus is on the city, not only the host country. • The event is the 2020 Summer Olympics. • The options are Tokyo, Seoul, Dubai and Singapore. Concept / Approach: The International Olympic Committee chose Tokyo as the host city for the 2020 Summer Olympics. Tokyo is the capital of Japan and had previously hosted the Summer Games in 1964. While Seoul, Dubai and Singapore are also famous international cities, none of them was selected to host the 2020 Summer Olympics. Therefore, remembering the phrase “Tokyo 2020” provides a strong clue to the correct answer. Step-by-Step Solution: • Step 1: Recall that promotional material and media coverage repeatedly used the name “Tokyo 2020” for the Games. • Step 2: Understand that “Tokyo 2020” directly points to Tokyo as the host city. • Step 3: Recognize that Seoul is associated with the 1988 Summer Olympics, not the 2020 Games. • Step 4: Note that Dubai and Singapore have not yet hosted any Summer Olympic Games. • Step 5: From the options, select Tokyo as the correct venue. Verification / Alternative check: Official Olympic websites, event logos, and tickets all use the branding “Tokyo 2020” and show images of iconic Tokyo landmarks. Historical summaries of the Olympics list Tokyo as the host city for 2020, just as they list Rio de Janeiro for 2016 and London for 2012. Since no other city in the options has that association with the 2020 Games, Tokyo is the confirmed correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • Seoul: Host city for the 1988 Summer Olympics, not for 2020. • Dubai: A major city in the United Arab Emirates, but not yet an Olympic host. • Singapore: Host of the first Youth Olympic Games in 2010, but not the 2020 Summer Olympics. Common Pitfalls: Students may confuse different Asian cities that have hosted or bid for major events, mixing up Seoul 1988, Beijing 2008 and Tokyo 2020. Others may assume that modern global cities like Dubai or Singapore must have hosted the Games because of their infrastructure. To avoid confusion, maintain a simple mental timeline of recent Olympic hosts and associate each year with a specific city. Final Answer: The venue city for the 2020 Summer Olympic Games was Tokyo.

Question 14

Who was the first woman from India to become a Chess Grandmaster?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: India has produced several strong women chess players, and the title of Grandmaster is one of the highest achievements in the game. Knowing who was the first Indian woman to achieve this status is an important fact in both sports and general knowledge. This question checks your awareness of India progress in international chess, particularly in women events. Given Data / Assumptions: • The focus is on the first Indian woman to become a Chess Grandmaster. • The options list well known women chess players and one less familiar name. • You must identify who achieved this milestone first. Concept / Approach: S. Vijayalakshmi is widely recognized as the first woman from India to achieve the Chess Grandmaster title. While Tania Sachdev and Harika Dronavalli are also strong Indian women chess players with significant titles and achievements, they attained their distinctions later. Richa Pujari is not known as the first woman Grandmaster. Remembering S. Vijayalakshmi pioneering role helps you identify the correct option quickly. Step-by-Step Solution: • Step 1: List famous Indian women chess players in your mind, such as S. Vijayalakshmi, Tania Sachdev and Harika Dronavalli. • Step 2: Recall that S. Vijayalakshmi is often mentioned as a trailblazer and pioneer in Indian women chess. • Step 3: Understand that she was the first Indian woman to reach the Grandmaster level. • Step 4: Recognize that while Tania Sachdev and Harika Dronavalli are highly accomplished, they were not the first. • Step 5: Select S. Vijayalakshmi as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Chess federation records and biographical sources identify S. Vijayalakshmi as India first woman Grandmaster. Articles on the history of Indian chess repeatedly mention her name when discussing the development of women chess in the country. In contrast, Tania Sachdev and Harika Dronavalli are described as later stars building on the foundation laid by players like Vijayalakshmi. These consistent references verify that she was indeed the first. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • Tania Sachdev: A strong Indian woman International Master and commentator, but not the first woman Grandmaster from India. • Harika Dronavalli: A very successful Indian woman Grandmaster, but she achieved the title after S. Vijayalakshmi. • Richa Pujari: Not recognized in standard records as the first Indian woman Grandmaster. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to choose a more recently famous name like Harika Dronavalli because her achievements are fresher in memory. Some candidates also forget the chronological aspect of the question and pick any known Grandmaster. Always pay attention to words like “first”, “most recent” or “youngest” in such questions, because they change the requirement from mere recognition to remembering the order of achievements. Final Answer: The first Indian woman to become a Chess Grandmaster was S. Vijayalakshmi.

Question 15

Which was the first Asian city to host the Summer Olympic Games?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The history of the Olympic Games includes important milestones when new continents and regions first hosted the event. One such milestone was when an Asian city hosted the Summer Olympics for the first time. This question asks you to identify that pioneering Asian city, making it a classic topic in sports history and general knowledge examinations. Given Data / Assumptions: • The focus is on the first Asian city to host the Summer Olympics. • Several cities are listed, including some from Asia and one from Europe. • You must choose the correct city based on Olympic history. Concept / Approach: Tokyo, the capital of Japan, became the first Asian city to host the Summer Olympic Games in 1964. Beijing and Seoul later hosted the Summer Olympics in 2008 and 1988 respectively, while Singapore has not hosted the Summer Olympics, although it hosted the first Youth Olympic Games in 2010. Moscow is a European city and hosted the 1980 Summer Olympics, not the first Asian Games. Therefore, Tokyo is the correct answer. Step-by-Step Solution: • Step 1: Recall that Tokyo hosted the Summer Olympics in 1964, a major global event at that time. • Step 2: Recognize that this was the first time the Summer Olympics were held in Asia. • Step 3: Note that Beijing hosted the Summer Olympics later, in 2008. • Step 4: Understand that Moscow, while once a host city, is not in Asia for Olympic classification, and Singapore has not yet hosted the Summer Games. • Step 5: Select Tokyo as the first Asian city to host the Summer Olympics. Verification / Alternative check: Historical Olympic records list each host city and year. For 1964, they identify Tokyo, Japan as the host of the Summer Olympics, and note that this was the first time the Games took place in Asia. Later entries mention Seoul 1988 and Beijing 2008. None of these sources list Moscow or Singapore as the first Asian host city. This cross checking confirms that Tokyo holds that distinction. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • Moscow: Host of the 1980 Summer Olympics and located in Europe, not the first Asian host. • Beijing: Hosted the Summer Olympics in 2008, but this was decades after Tokyo 1964. • Singapore: Has not hosted the Summer Olympics; only the Youth Olympic Games in 2010. Common Pitfalls: Exam candidates sometimes confuse the order of Asian host cities, especially between Tokyo, Seoul and Beijing. Others may misclassify Moscow or assume that any large modern city in Asia must have hosted the Games first. To avoid such errors, keep a simple chronological list in mind: Tokyo 1964, Seoul 1988 and Beijing 2008 for Summer Olympics in Asia. Final Answer: The first Asian city to host the Summer Olympic Games was Tokyo.

Question 16

What was India overall rank in the medal table at the Rio 2016 Olympic Games?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Apart from the number of medals won, a country overall rank in the Olympic medal table is an important indicator of its performance. India rank at the Rio 2016 Olympics is often quoted in discussions about how the country fared and how much improvement is needed. This question checks whether you can recall India approximate position in the final medal standings at Rio 2016. Given Data / Assumptions: • The event is the Rio 2016 Olympic Games. • India is known to have won a small number of medals there. • The options list possible overall ranks: 11, 33, 67 and 96. Concept / Approach: India finished quite low in the medal rankings at Rio 2016 because it won only two medals in total, one silver and one bronze. The medal table is typically sorted first by gold medals, then silver, then bronze. Countries with larger medal tallies and more gold medals naturally rank higher. Given India limited success at these Games, a rank in the sixties is much more realistic than a rank as high as 11 or 33. The specific rank commonly cited is 67. Step-by-Step Solution: • Step 1: Recall that India won only two medals at Rio 2016. • Step 2: Understand that many other countries won more medals and more gold medals than India. • Step 3: Recognize that a low medal count results in a relatively low position in the medal table. • Step 4: Among the given ranks, 67 matches the commonly reported position for India at Rio 2016. • Step 5: Select Rank 67 as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Official Olympic medal tables and reputable sports summaries of Rio 2016 list India around rank 67, sometimes tied with other countries that also won a single silver and bronze without any gold medals. These tables clearly show many nations ahead of India in terms of both total medals and number of golds. Since none of the higher ranks in the options reflect this modest performance, rank 67 is confirmed as the accurate figure. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • Rank 11: This would suggest that India was among the top performing nations, which is not supported by the two medal tally. • Rank 33: Still too high based on India actual medal count. • Rank 96: This is lower than the widely reported position and does not match standard medal table listings. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may overestimate India rank out of optimism, choosing a higher rank number like 11 or 33. Others may underestimate and pick an extremely low rank such as 96. The correct approach is to remember that India was ranked significantly below the top performing countries but not at the very bottom of the table. Keeping a rough memory that India stood around the mid sixties helps avoid these extremes. Final Answer: India overall rank in the medal table at Rio 2016 was approximately Rank 67.

Question 17

In international rugby union, which country hosted the 2015 Mens Rugby World Cup tournament?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This general knowledge sports question checks whether you remember the host nation of the 2015 Mens Rugby World Cup. Many learners confuse the country that hosted the tournament with the country that actually won the title, so it is a good test of how well you can separate host facts from winner facts in international rugby union history. Given Data / Assumptions: We are given the following key information. The event is the Mens Rugby World Cup. The specific edition mentioned is the year 2015. We are asked to identify the country that hosted the tournament. Answer choices include England, New Zealand, South Africa and Australia. Concept / Approach: The Rugby World Cup is held every four years and different rugby playing nations host it in turn. The host country may or may not go on to win the tournament, so we must focus on where the matches were staged, not who became champion. The 2015 Mens Rugby World Cup was primarily hosted by England, with most of the matches, including the final, played at stadiums within England. Some fixtures were also played in Cardiff in Wales, but the official host union and main host country for that edition was England. Therefore we recall the historical fact and select the only option that matches the official host nation. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Read the year carefully and note that the tournament is the 2015 Rugby World Cup. Step 2: Recall that 2011 was hosted by New Zealand and 2019 was hosted by Japan, so those years do not match 2015. Step 3: Remember that the 2015 edition was centered in England, with the final at Twickenham Stadium in London. Step 4: Compare this fact with the choices and see that England is the correct host country. Step 5: Select England as the final answer. Verification / Alternative check: A quick mental timeline of recent Rugby World Cups supports this result. In 2011 New Zealand hosted and also won. In 2015 England hosted but New Zealand won the cup again. Later, in 2019, Japan hosted the tournament. This sequence confirms that the host country for the 2015 edition is England and not the other major rugby nations listed in the options. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B New Zealand is wrong because New Zealand hosted the 2011 Rugby World Cup, not the 2015 edition. Option C South Africa is wrong because South Africa hosted the 1995 Rugby World Cup, not the 2015 tournament. Option D Australia is wrong because Australia co hosted in 1987 and hosted in 2003, but did not host in 2015. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to confuse the country that wins the Rugby World Cup with the country that hosts it. In 2015, New Zealand were the champions, so some candidates wrongly pick New Zealand as the host. Another pitfall is mixing up the years of different tournaments. Keeping a rough mental chronology of recent Rugby World Cups helps avoid this confusion in exam questions. Final Answer: The correct host country of the 2015 Mens Rugby World Cup was England.

Question 18

In English football, which club won the 2016-17 Premier League title?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question tests your knowledge of recent English Premier League history, specifically the club that finished as champion in the 2016-17 season. Remembering league winners by season is a standard type of sports general knowledge question that appears often in competitive exams. Given Data / Assumptions: We can summarise the information as follows. The league in question is the English Premier League. The season asked about is 2016-17. We must pick the champion club from four famous teams. Options include Chelsea, Manchester City, Leicester City and Manchester United. Concept / Approach: To answer this, we rely on factual recall of league standings. Leicester City produced a historic title win in the 2015-16 season. In the next season 2016-17, Chelsea, managed by Antonio Conte, had a very strong campaign using a three defender formation and finished as champions. Manchester City and Manchester United are regular title contenders, but for that specific season Chelsea finished on top of the table. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall that Leicester City shocked the football world by winning in 2015-16, so they are not the winners in 2016-17. Step 2: Remember that in 2016-17 Chelsea went on a long winning run under manager Antonio Conte. Step 3: Check that Manchester City won the title later in 2017-18 under Pep Guardiola, not in 2016-17. Step 4: Note that Manchester United did not top the table in this period, finishing lower than first. Step 5: Conclude that Chelsea were the champions in the 2016-17 Premier League season. Verification / Alternative check: Another way to verify is by remembering the sequence of recent champions. From 2014-15 to 2018-19 the winners were Chelsea, Leicester City, Chelsea, Manchester City and Manchester City. This sequence clearly shows that Chelsea reclaimed the title in 2016-17 after Leicester City, which confirms that Chelsea is the correct option in this question. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option B Manchester City is wrong because they won in 2017-18 and 2018-19 but not in 2016-17. Option C Leicester City is wrong because their surprise title win came in the previous 2015-16 season. Option D Manchester United is wrong because they did not win any Premier League title in this period. Common Pitfalls: Students often confuse the remarkable Leicester City win with nearby seasons or assume that Manchester City dominate every recent year. Another pitfall is not connecting the manager to the season, even though remembering that Conte led Chelsea to the 2016-17 title can quickly guide you to the correct answer. Building a simple mental timeline of champions is a helpful long term revision strategy. Final Answer: The club that won the 2016-17 Premier League title was Chelsea.

Question 19

Consider the following sports statements about the year 2017: 1 Glenn Maxwell captained the IPL team Kings XI Punjab. 2 Roger Federer won the Tennis 2017 Miami Open Womens Singles ITTF World Tour event. 3 Bernhard Langer won the Golf 2017 Senior PGA…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This multiple statement question checks your detailed awareness of different sports events around the year 2017. It mixes cricket, tennis and golf in a single stem and asks you to identify which of the given statements are factually correct. Such questions test both your memory of specific results and your ability to notice obvious mismatches, for example a tennis legend being linked incorrectly to a table tennis event. Given Data / Assumptions: The question provides three statements coded as A, B and C. Statement A says that in 2017 Glenn Maxwell captained the IPL team Kings XI Punjab. Statement B claims that Roger Federer won the Tennis 2017 ITTF World Tour Grand Finals Mens Singles, which actually belongs to table tennis. Statement C states that Bernhard Langer won the Golf 2017 Senior PGA Championship. We must decide which statements are correct and select the appropriate combination from the options. Concept / Approach: To solve this, evaluate each statement independently. First, recall that Glenn Maxwell, an Australian all rounder, was indeed appointed captain of Kings XI Punjab for the 2017 Indian Premier League season, so statement A is correct. Next, Roger Federer is a professional tennis player and does not play table tennis. The ITTF World Tour Grand Finals is a table tennis competition, so linking Roger Federer to that result is clearly incorrect, which makes statement B wrong. Finally, in senior golf, Bernhard Langer did win the Senior PGA Championship in 2017, becoming one of the most successful senior golfers, so statement C is correct. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Check statement A. Confirm from cricket knowledge that Glenn Maxwell led Kings XI Punjab in the 2017 IPL season. Therefore A is correct. Step 2: Check statement B. Note that the ITTF World Tour is a table tennis event under the International Table Tennis Federation, while Roger Federer is a tennis legend under the ATP. Therefore statement B must be false. Step 3: Check statement C. Recall that Bernhard Langer won the Senior PGA Championship in 2017, completing a career sweep of senior majors. So C is correct. Step 4: Combine results. A is correct, B is wrong, C is correct. The option that matches this pattern is A and C. Verification / Alternative check: You can cross check by separately thinking about each sport. In cricket, Kings XI Punjab made Glenn Maxwell captain for one season, which is widely reported. In golf, news reports describe Bernhard Langer winning the 2017 Senior PGA Championship and setting records for senior majors. In table tennis, the ITTF World Tour Grand Finals winners are specialist table tennis players, not Roger Federer, which confirms that statement B is constructed to mislead you. All of these checks support the combination A and C. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A Only A is wrong because it ignores the true statement about Bernhard Langer in senior golf. Option B B and C is wrong because B is false, even though C is correct. Option D A and B is wrong because it treats statement B as correct even though it mismatches tennis and table tennis events. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake is to skim the words and see only Roger Federer and Grand Finals, then assume it must be correct. Another pitfall is not distinguishing between tennis tournaments and table tennis events. Exam setters deliberately mix different sports bodies such as ATP, ITTF and golf tours to confuse you. Carefully reading the sport and event name helps you avoid these errors. Final Answer: The correct combination of true statements is A and C.

Question 20

Yogeshwar Dutt, an Indian Olympic medallist, is associated with which sport?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question checks whether you can correctly link a well known Indian athlete, Yogeshwar Dutt, with his main sport. Questions of this type are classic static sports general knowledge and appear frequently in exams that test awareness of Indian Olympic medallists and famous players. Given Data / Assumptions: We can summarise the information as follows. The athlete mentioned is Yogeshwar Dutt. He is described as an Indian Olympic medallist. We must choose the correct sport associated with him from the options. Options include discus throw, wrestling, shooting and pole vault. Concept / Approach: Yogeshwar Dutt is a celebrated Indian freestyle wrestler who won a bronze medal at the London 2012 Olympics in the mens 60 kilogram category. He has also earned medals in Commonwealth Games and Asian Games. None of his achievements are in throwing events, shooting, or pole vault. Therefore, from basic sports awareness, we can confidently match his name with the sport of wrestling. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recall basic facts about Yogeshwar Dutt from sports news and Olympic coverage. Step 2: Remember that he competes on the wrestling mat in freestyle categories, not on an athletics track or in a shooting range. Step 3: Compare the options and identify which sport is wrestling. Step 4: Verify that none of his career highlights involve discus throw, shooting or pole vault. Step 5: Select wrestling as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: You might recall photographs and commentary from the London 2012 Olympics where Yogeshwar Dutt wrestled for India and won a bronze medal. Later, he was widely covered in news as a wrestling star along with other Indian wrestlers. This memory reinforces that his discipline is wrestling, confirming that the other athletics and shooting options are only distractors. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Option A discus throw is wrong because Yogeshwar Dutt has never been known as a discus thrower and is not part of that athletics event. Option C shooting is incorrect because Indian shooting legends include names like Abhinav Bindra, Gagan Narang and others, not Yogeshwar Dutt. Option D pole vault is wrong since India has different athletes in that track and field event, and Yogeshwar is not one of them. Common Pitfalls: Sometimes candidates confuse Yogeshwar Dutt with other Indian medallists across different sports, especially if they only remember the names vaguely. A good revision strategy is to maintain a short list that clearly links each major Indian Olympic medallist with his or her sport so that these simple association questions can be answered instantly. Final Answer: Yogeshwar Dutt is associated with the sport of Wrestling.

Sports Questions

Questions

Practice smarter