Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Only II follows
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
We must choose responses that are feasible, proportionate, and within the control of road authorities to reduce peak-hour congestion on the airport corridor.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Courses of action should rely on standard traffic-management tools under local jurisdiction and avoid overbroad restrictions or steps beyond the authority’s remit.
Step-by-Step Solution:
I: A blanket ban on non-airport traffic is over-restrictive, hard to enforce, and may unduly harm local access. Not a balanced first-line response.II: Diverting part of the load via link roads is a common, feasible traffic-management measure that can be implemented during peak windows. This follows.III: Regulating flight schedules implicates aviation regulators and airlines; road authorities typically cannot control this. It is beyond scope and not a primary road-traffic solution.
Verification / Alternative check:
Traffic engineering prioritizes demand management and routing (II) before extreme restrictions (I) or cross-agency measures (III).
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Jumping to extreme bans or assuming coordination with aviation scheduling is readily achievable by traffic police.
Final Answer:
Only II follows
Discussion & Comments