Decision reasoning – roads damaged by incessant rain Statement: All major city roads have deteriorated due to two months of incessant rain. Courses of Action to evaluate: I. Deploy additional traffic staff to regulate vehicular movement. II. Immediately arrange repairs for the damaged roads. III. Alert motorists with sign boards about bad patches to help trip planning. Which course(s) logically follow(s)?

Introduction / Context:
Damaged roads pose safety and congestion risks. Multiple coordinated actions can mitigate immediate hazards and restore mobility.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Widespread deterioration after prolonged rain.
• Traffic flow and safety are affected.
• Authorities can deploy staff, repair roads, and inform users.

Concept / Approach:
Effective incident management combines control (traffic regulation), remediation (repairs), and communication (warnings) to reduce accidents and delays.

Step-by-Step Solution:
I: Additional traffic staff manage bottlenecks and diversions, reducing collision risk. Logical and immediate.II: Repairs address the root problem; prompt patchwork and resurfacing are necessary. Logical.III: Sign boards alert motorists to hazards and allow route/time adjustments. Logical and low-cost.

Verification / Alternative check:
All three steps are complementary: operational control, corrective maintenance, and timely public information.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Any subset omits a useful, feasible measure with clear benefit.
• “None” contradicts clear municipal responsibilities.

Common Pitfalls:
Choosing only repairs and ignoring short-term traffic management and communication.

Final Answer:
All follow