Question 1

Rajiv is the brother of Arun. Sonia is the sister of Sunil. Arun is the son of Sonia. In this family relation question, how is Rajiv related to Sunil?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This problem gives a short chain of relations involving four people: Rajiv, Arun, Sonia and Sunil. The information connects who is a brother, who is a sister and who is a son. From this, we must decide how Rajiv is related to Sunil. The question is typical of blood relation problems in verbal reasoning, where converting sentences into a family tree quickly reveals the answer. Given Data / Assumptions:• Rajiv is the brother of Arun.• Sonia is the sister of Sunil.• Arun is the son of Sonia.• Standard assumptions about gender follow the statements. Concept / Approach:We start by placing Sonia and Sunil as siblings. Then we note that Arun is the son of Sonia, which makes Arun the nephew of Sunil. Next we use the fact that Rajiv is the brother of Arun. That means Rajiv is also a child of Sonia. As a result, Rajiv is another nephew of Sunil. Therefore, Rajiv is related to Sunil as nephew. The problem is solved by correctly tracking which generation each person belongs to and who is the parent of whom. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Sonia and Sunil are siblings, with Sonia explicitly described as sister of Sunil.Step 2: Arun is the son of Sonia, so Arun is a child of Sonia and is in the next generation below her.Step 3: Since Sonia and Sunil are siblings, any child of Sonia is a niece or nephew of Sunil. Thus Arun is nephew of Sunil.Step 4: Rajiv is the brother of Arun.Step 5: Therefore Rajiv is also a child of Sonia, in the same generation as Arun.Step 6: As another child of Sonia, Rajiv is also a nephew of Sunil. Verification / Alternative check:If we draw a simple family tree, we put Sonia and Sunil on one horizontal level as siblings. From Sonia, we draw two children, Arun and Rajiv. Looking from Sunil downward, both of these children are nieces or nephews. Because Arun and Rajiv are male, each is classified as a nephew. No other standard relation such as brother or son fits without contradicting the data about who is parent and who is sibling. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Son of Sunil: For this to be true, Sunil would need to be the parent of Rajiv, but Sonia is clearly the parent of Arun and hence of Rajiv.Brother of Sunil: Brothers share parents in the same generation, but Rajiv is one generation below Sunil.Father of Sunil: That would require Rajiv to be one generation above Sunil, which is not the case.Uncle of Sunil: An uncle is a sibling of a parent, the reverse of the actual situation here. Common Pitfalls:Some candidates quickly see Arun is nephew of Sunil but then mistakenly think Rajiv, as a brother of Arun, might be a cousin of Sunil. This occurs when people do not carefully track who the parent is. As soon as we realise that Rajiv and Arun share the same mother Sonia, who is Sunil's sister, it becomes clear that both are nephews of Sunil. Final Answer:Rajiv is the nephew of Sunil.

Question 2

Poonam told Akshay that yesterday she defeated Sneha, who is described as the daughter of Akshay's only sister, in a school Taekwondo competition. In this blood relation question, how is Akshay related to Sneha?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This is a short and direct blood relation problem about Akshay and Sneha. Poonam gives a description that Sneha is the daughter of the only sister of Akshay. The task is to determine how Akshay is related to Sneha. Questions like this check whether you can immediately recognise standard relations such as niece and uncle from a brief description. Given Data / Assumptions:• Akshay has exactly one sister.• Sneha is the daughter of this only sister.• There is no information that would change the normal meaning of sister or daughter. Concept / Approach:If Sneha is the daughter of Akshay's sister, then Akshay is the sibling of Sneha's mother. A male sibling of one's parent is an uncle. Therefore, Akshay is the maternal uncle of Sneha, because he is the brother of her mother. Recognising this pattern is the key to answering the question quickly. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Identify Akshay's only sister, call her S.Step 2: Sneha is said to be the daughter of S.Step 3: That makes S the mother of Sneha.Step 4: Akshay is the brother of S, so he is the brother of Sneha's mother.Step 5: The brother of a child's mother is the child's maternal uncle.Step 6: Hence Akshay is the uncle of Sneha. Verification / Alternative check:From the perspective of Sneha, her mother has a brother, Akshay. There is no other close male relative described. In every culture that uses these reasoning questions, the term for brother of the mother is uncle, and because the connection is through the mother, it is more specifically maternal uncle. There is no sign that Akshay is a grandparent, parent or cousin of Sneha, so uncle is the only consistent role. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Grandfather of Sneha: This would require Akshay to be the father of Sneha's parent, which is not stated.Father of Sneha: The question clearly identifies Sneha's mother as Akshay's sister, not as his daughter.Cousin of Sneha: Cousins share grandparents, but Akshay is one generation above Sneha.Brother of Sneha: A brother shares parents with you; Akshay does not share parents with Sneha but with her mother. Common Pitfalls:Some candidates rush and confuse the direction of the relationship, thinking Sneha might be Akshay's cousin because the word sister appears. Others forget to check the generation. Keeping track of who is parent and who is child is enough to see that Akshay is in the generation above Sneha and is her uncle, not a cousin or sibling. Final Answer:Akshay is the uncle of Sneha.

Question 3

A woman points to a man and says, "He is the widower of the daughter of the brother of my uncle." Based on this description, how is the man related to the woman?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This problem uses a chain of relations through an uncle and his brother to describe a woman whose widower is the man being pointed at. We must decode the phrase and then decide how the man is related to the woman. These questions are common in reasoning tests and require careful attention to each step of the relationship chain. Given Data / Assumptions:• The speaker is a woman.• She mentions her uncle, that uncle's brother and the daughter of that brother.• The man is the widower of that daughter.• An uncle is usually a brother of one of the parents.• We assume the brother of that uncle is another sibling of the parent, not necessarily the parent itself, so that the daughter is usually a cousin of the woman. Concept / Approach:First, identify the daughter mentioned. The woman speaks of the brother of her uncle. Both the uncle and his brother are part of the parental generation. The brother of her uncle is very often another uncle or possibly her own parent. The daughter of that brother is typically a cousin of the woman. The man is the widower of that cousin, meaning he is the husband of the woman's cousin. In many family relation questions, the husband of a cousin is treated as a brother in law of the speaker. Therefore the man is best described as the brother in law of the woman. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Let U be the uncle of the woman. U is a brother of one of her parents.Step 2: Let B be the brother of U. B is also in the parental generation of the woman and is typically another uncle or her parent.Step 3: The daughter of B is a woman in the same generation as the speaker, and is normally her cousin.Step 4: The man being pointed to is the widower of this daughter, so he is the husband of the woman's cousin.Step 5: The husband of a cousin is commonly referred to as a brother in law in many reasoning questions and family descriptions.Step 6: Therefore, from the speaker's perspective, the man is her brother in law. Verification / Alternative check:Draw a family in which a grandparent has at least three children, including the speaker's parent, the uncle U and the uncle or parent B. B has a daughter who becomes a cousin of the speaker. The man is married to this cousin and is now a widower. This man is connected by marriage into the extended family. In the standard vocabulary used in such problems, he is treated as the brother in law of the speaker, because he is the spouse of a cousin in the same generation. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Brother of the woman: That would require the man to share both parents with the woman, which is not indicated.Uncle of the woman: An uncle would be a brother of a parent or the husband of an aunt, which does not match the description of being husband of a cousin.Nephew of the woman: A nephew is a child of a sibling or close cousin, not a spouse of a cousin in the same generation.No direct family relation: The chain explicitly shows a family connection through the cousin. Common Pitfalls:Many candidates misinterpret the brother of my uncle as always being the parent and then mistakenly treat the daughter as the speaker herself. That would make the man her own widower, which obviously cannot be the current relationship in the question setting. Treating the brother of the uncle as another relative in the same parental generation and recognising the daughter as a cousin avoids this trap and leads correctly to brother in law. Final Answer:The man is the brother in law of the woman.

Question 4

A is the brother of B, C is the mother of A, D is the father of C, and F is the son of A. In this multigeneration blood relation question, how is A related to the child of F?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This question links four people across several generations: A, B, C, D and F. We know how A is related to B, who C is to A, who D is to C and that F is the son of A. We then need to identify the relation of A to the child of F. The problem mainly tests recognition of grandparents in a family tree. Given Data / Assumptions:• A is the brother of B, which means A is male.• C is the mother of A, so C is one generation above A.• D is the father of C, so D is two generations above A.• F is the son of A, so F is one generation below A.• We are asked for the relation between A and the child of F. Concept / Approach:F is given clearly as the son of A. The child of F is therefore one more generation below F. From the perspective of A, F is a child and the child of F is a grandchild. Because A is male, he will be a grandfather to this grandchild. So, A is the grandfather of the child of F. The chain across generations is what matters here, not the intermediate relatives D and C, which mainly confirm the generational order. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: From A is brother of B, confirm that A is male.Step 2: C is mother of A, placing C one generation above A.Step 3: D is father of C, placing D two generations above A.Step 4: F is son of A, placing F one generation below A.Step 5: The child of F is one more generation down from F.Step 6: Any person whose child has a child is a grandparent to that second child.Step 7: Since A is male, he is the grandfather of the child of F. Verification / Alternative check:If we draw the generations, D sits at the top, then comes C, then A and B, then F, and finally the child of F. This gives five levels. A is on the third level and the child of F is on the fifth. There are exactly two generational steps between A and the child of F, confirming a grandparent and grandchild relationship. Because the intermediate step from A to F is parent and child, the step from A to the child of F must be grandparent and grandchild. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Aunt of the child: An aunt is a sister of a parent; A is male and also the direct parent of the father, not a sibling.Cousin of the child: Cousins share grandparents; A is one of those grandparents here, not a cousin.Nephew of the child: This reverses generations and would make A younger than the child, which is impossible with the given data.Brother of the child: A brother shares the same parents as the child, not a child's grandparent. Common Pitfalls:Often, candidates ignore the simple generational structure and overthink the role of D and C, although they are not needed to answer the question about the child of F. Remember that once you know F is the son of A, it is enough to see that A is parent of F and grandparent of F's child. Keeping track of generations consistently avoids confusion. Final Answer:A is the grandfather of the child of F.

Question 5

Pointing to a man, a woman says, "His mother is the only daughter of my mother." In this verbal reasoning blood relation puzzle, how is the woman related to the man?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This is a classic and simple blood relation question. A woman points to a man and describes his mother by using the phrase only daughter of my mother. We must interpret this description carefully to find out who the woman herself is in relation to the man. Such questions are common in competitive exams and test clear thinking with everyday family words. Given Data / Assumptions:• The speaker is a woman.• She says that the mother of the man is the only daughter of her own mother.• Only daughter of a woman means that there is exactly one female child.• No other daughters are implied. Concept / Approach:The phrase my mother refers to the speaker's mother. The only daughter of my mother is the speaker herself, because she is a woman and there is only one daughter in that family. When she says his mother is the only daughter of my mother, she is effectively saying his mother is me. That means the speaker is the mother of the man in the photograph. Recognising this step is the key to answering the question. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Let M be the mother of the woman who is speaking.Step 2: The speaker says that the mother of the man is the only daughter of M.Step 3: The speaker herself is a daughter of M.Step 4: Since M has only one daughter, the speaker must be that only daughter.Step 5: Therefore, the mother of the man is the speaker herself.Step 6: If the speaker is the mother of the man, then in family relation terms, the woman is the mother and the man is her son. Verification / Alternative check:We can test if any other person could be the only daughter of the speaker's mother. If there were another daughter, then the phrase only daughter would be false. The statement does not mention any other sister. Thus the only daughter is uniquely identified as the speaker. Once that is established, there is no alternative but to interpret his mother as the speaker. So, the link is clear and unambiguous. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Daughter of the man: This would require the woman to be of a younger generation, which is opposite to her being the mother.Sister of the man: For this to be true, his mother and the speaker would share parents as siblings, not be the same person.Grandmother of the man: A grandmother would be mother of his parent, adding one more generation.Aunt of the man: An aunt would be a sister of his parent, which again is not the case here. Common Pitfalls:Many candidates misread only daughter and assume the woman might be talking about a sister. Others forget that the speaker is a woman and directly fits the role of a daughter of her mother. Paying attention to the word only and mapping it to the speaker herself avoids confusion and leads directly to the correct conclusion that she is the man's mother. Final Answer:The woman is the mother of the man in the photograph.

Question 6

A family has six members P, Q, R, X, Y and Z. Q is the son of R, but R is not the mother of Q. P and R are a married couple. Y is the brother of R. X is the daughter of P. Z is the brother of P. In this family, how is Q related to X?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This question is a structured family relation puzzle. Six members of a family are linked by statements about marriage, parenthood and sibling relationships. The specific task is to find out how Q is related to X. To solve this type of problem, we must place each member in the correct generation and family position, then read off the required relationship. Given Data / Assumptions:• Q is the son of R, but R is not the mother of Q.• P and R are married.• Y is the brother of R.• X is the daughter of P.• Z is the brother of P.• There are no additional hidden relationships. Concept / Approach:The statement that Q is the son of R and R is not the mother of Q means that R must be the father of Q. Since P and R are a married couple, P becomes the mother of Q. X is stated to be the daughter of P, so X is another child of P and R. That makes Q and X siblings, with Q being the brother and X the sister. Therefore Q is related to X as brother. Recognising R as the father and P as the mother is the central step. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Q is son of R and R is not mother, so R is the father of Q.Step 2: P is married to R, so P is the spouse of R.Step 3: Since Q is child of R, and P is R's partner, P is naturally the mother of Q.Step 4: X is daughter of P, so X is also child of P.Step 5: This means X and Q are both children of the same couple P and R.Step 6: Two children of the same parents are siblings, and since Q is male, he is the brother and X is the sister. Verification / Alternative check:A simple tree has parents P and R in the middle generation. They have at least two children, Q and X. Y is brother of R, so he is an uncle to Q and X. Z is brother of P, so he is another uncle. None of this changes the fact that Q and X share both parents. The only consistent relationship between them is that of brother and sister. Q cannot be father, husband or cousin of X while still fitting all the given conditions. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Husband of X: For this, X and Q would be spouses, but the data clearly makes them children of the same parents.Father of X: Q is in the same generation as X, not one generation above.Uncle of X: An uncle would be a brother of a parent, whereas Q is the child of the parents.Cousin of X: Cousins are children of siblings, not children of the same parents. Common Pitfalls:Some candidates wrongly imagine that the couple mentioned may have separate sets of children and treat X and Q as cousins. Another error is to overlook the phrase R is not mother of Q and not interpret R as father. A disciplined reading that first fixes who is father and who is mother and then identifies all children usually prevents these mistakes. Final Answer:Q is the brother of X.

Question 7

A man points to a lady and says, "Her brother is the father of the sister of my only son." In this blood relation question, how is that lady related to the man?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This verbal reasoning problem describes a lady, her brother and how he is related to the sister of the man's only son. The objective is to find the relation between the lady and the man. These questions require careful unpacking of expressions such as father of the sister of my only son and identifying who that father is in the family tree of the man. Given Data / Assumptions:• The speaker is a man who has exactly one son.• The lady has a brother.• The lady's brother is the father of the sister of the man's only son.• There is at least one daughter in the man's children because his son has a sister.• No other hidden relationships are assumed. Concept / Approach:The sister of the man's only son must be another child of the man. Since the father of this sister is the lady's brother, it means the lady's brother and the man are the same person. If the man himself is the father of his own son's sister, and that person is described as the brother of the lady, then the lady must be the sister of the man. In other words, the man is the brother of the lady, and the lady is the man's sister. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Consider the man's only son, call him S.Step 2: The sister of S is another child of the man, call her D.Step 3: The father of D is the man himself, since D is his daughter.Step 4: The statement says that the lady's brother is the father of the sister of the man's only son.Step 5: Therefore, the lady's brother is the father of D.Step 6: Since the father of D is the man, it follows that the lady's brother is the man.Step 7: If the man is the brother of the lady, then the lady is the sister of the man. Verification / Alternative check:Imagine a family where a man has two children, a son and a daughter. Now imagine he has a sister. If he says about his sister, her brother is the father of my only son's sister, he is effectively referring to himself as her brother and father of the daughter. This matches the given sentence exactly. The only way this works is if the lady is his sister. None of the other relations, such as daughter in law or niece, can be made to fit the chain described. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Daughter in law of the man: A daughter in law would be married to his son, not be his sibling.Niece of the man: A niece is a child of a sibling, not a sibling of the person himself.Daughter of the man: This would place the lady in the same generation as his children, not as his sibling.Cousin of the man: A cousin shares grandparents, not a direct parent as in the case of siblings. Common Pitfalls:Candidates might mistakenly think the father of the sister of my only son could be a different person, but in a standard family the father of both son and daughter is the man himself. Once that is recognised, it is straightforward to equate the lady's brother with the man and thus identify the lady as his sister. Final Answer:The lady is the sister of the man.

Question 8

I, J, K and L are distinct individuals. I is the daughter of J. J is the son of K, and K is the father of L. B is the son of J, and B has one brother D. Based on these family relations, which of the following statements are true: I. I is the sister …

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This reasoning problem introduces several people, I, J, K, L, B and D, and describes how they are connected as parents and children. We are given three statements about their relationships and asked to decide which ones are true. Such questions require building a clear mental or written family tree and then carefully checking each statement against that structure. Given Data / Assumptions:• I is the daughter of J, so I is a child of J and female.• J is the son of K, so J is a child of K and male.• K is the father of L, so L is another child of K.• B is the son of J, so B is a child of J and male.• B has one brother, D, so D is also a son of J.• Therefore J has at least three children: I, B and D. Concept / Approach:Once we recognise J as the parent of I, B and D, and K as the parent of J, it becomes easy to evaluate the proposed statements. Statement I says that I is the sister of D, which matches the data because I and D share the same father J and I is female. Statement II says that D and B are brothers, which matches because both are male children of J. Statement III says that K is the grandfather of D, which is correct as K is the father of J and J is the father of D. All three statements are therefore true. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: From I is the daughter of J, mark I as female child of J.Step 2: From B is the son of J and B has one brother D, mark B and D as male children of J.Step 3: Conclude that J is parent of I, B and D.Step 4: From J is the son of K, note that K is one generation above J, thus grandparent to I, B and D.Step 5: Check statement I: I and D share parent J and I is female, so I is sister of D. This is true.Step 6: Check statement II: D and B are both sons of J, which confirms they are brothers. This is true.Step 7: Check statement III: K is father of J and J is father of D, hence K is grandfather of D. This is also true. Verification / Alternative check:A quick family tree has K at the top, with children J and L on the next line. J then has three children: I (daughter), B (son) and D (son). From this diagram, we can visually see that I is sister to B and D, B and D are brothers to each other, and K is grandparent to all three. There is no way to interpret the data so that any of the statements becomes false without contradicting the given information. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Only statement I is true: This ignores the clearly correct relations in statements II and III.Statements I and II are true: This wrongly discards statement III, even though K is explicitly the father of J, who is father of D.Only statement III is true: This would ignore the direct sibling relations among I, B and D.None of the statements is true: This is clearly inconsistent with the given family structure. Common Pitfalls:Sometimes candidates forget that B having one brother D does not exclude other sisters, so they do not realise I is also a child of J. Others only track one or two links and therefore fail to see the grandparent relationship in statement III. Drawing a simple diagram is an excellent way to avoid such mistakes and confirm that all three statements are indeed true. Final Answer:All of the statements I, II and III are true.

Question 9

Pointing towards a photograph, Kiran said to Chotu, "I am the only daughter of this lady and her son is your maternal uncle." In this blood relation question, how is Kiran related to Chotu's father?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This question is very similar to a classic family relation puzzle. Kiran is looking at a photograph of a lady and describes herself as the only daughter of that lady. She then adds that the lady's son is the maternal uncle of Chotu. We need to determine how Kiran is related to Chotu's father. The problem tests understanding of maternal uncle and the roles of mothers and fathers in a simple family tree. Given Data / Assumptions:• Kiran is the only daughter of the lady in the photograph.• The lady also has a son who is the maternal uncle of Chotu.• A maternal uncle is the brother of one's mother.• Kiran and the son in question are both children of the same lady.• Standard family structure is assumed. Concept / Approach:If the son of the lady in the photograph is Chotu's maternal uncle, then he is the brother of Chotu's mother. That makes the lady in the photograph Chotu's maternal grandmother. Kiran is the only daughter of this grandmother, so she is also a child of the same grandmother and therefore a sister of Chotu's maternal uncle. As a sister of Chotu's maternal uncle and a daughter of the maternal grandmother, Kiran is very naturally Chotu's mother. If she is Chotu's mother, then with respect to Chotu's father she must be his wife. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Let the lady in the photograph be G. Kiran is the only daughter of G.Step 2: G has a son who is the maternal uncle of Chotu.Step 3: If that son is maternal uncle of Chotu, he is brother of Chotu's mother.Step 4: Therefore, the mother of Chotu, call her M, is also a child of G, making G the maternal grandmother of Chotu.Step 5: G has exactly one daughter, Kiran. Thus, Kiran must be the same person as M, the mother of Chotu.Step 6: Hence, Kiran is Chotu's mother.Step 7: From the point of view of Chotu's father, the mother of Chotu is his wife. Verification / Alternative check:Draw a small family tree where G is the grandmother. She has two children, a son U and a daughter Kiran. U is the maternal uncle of Chotu, and Kiran is the only daughter of G. For U to be the maternal uncle, Kiran has to be Chotu's mother. No other arrangement satisfies both the only daughter condition and the maternal uncle condition at the same time. Thus the conclusion that Kiran is the mother of Chotu is forced, and she must therefore be the wife of Chotu's father. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Cousin of Chotu's father: This would place Kiran in a different branch of the family, which does not fit the grandmother and maternal uncle description.Daughter of Chotu's father: This would make Kiran a child of Chotu's father and of the grandmother in the photograph, which is impossible.Sister of Chotu's father: That would make the uncle paternal, not maternal.Mother of Chotu's father: This role is already played by G, the grandmother in the photograph. Common Pitfalls:Some candidates confuse whether the woman in the photograph is the mother or the grandmother of Chotu. Remember, if her son is Chotu's maternal uncle, she must be the maternal grandmother. Then, because Kiran is the only daughter of this grandmother, Kiran has to be Chotu's mother. Recognising these steps avoids misclassification of the relationship. Final Answer:Kiran is the wife of Chotu's father.

Question 10

P and Q are brothers. P is the father of S. R is the only son of Q and is married to U. Based on these relations, how is U related to S?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This blood relation question involves two brothers P and Q, their children S and R, and R's wife U. We are asked to determine how U is related to S. The problem highlights the relation between cousins and the spouses of cousins, which in many reasoning questions are treated as brothers in law or sisters in law. Given Data / Assumptions:• P and Q are brothers.• P is the father of S.• R is the only son of Q.• R is married to U.• Standard family terms are used without any special meaning. Concept / Approach:Since P and Q are brothers, their children are cousins. That means S, child of P, and R, child of Q, are first cousins. U is the wife of R. In many family relation questions and in ordinary language, the spouse of a cousin is referred to as a brother in law or sister in law. From S's perspective, U is the wife of her male cousin R. Hence U is S's sister in law. The question is simply checking recognition of this extended in law relation. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: P and Q are brothers, so they are in the same generation and share parents.Step 2: S is the child of P, so S belongs to the next generation.Step 3: R is the only son of Q, so R is also in the next generation.Step 4: Because their fathers P and Q are brothers, S and R are cousins.Step 5: R is married to U, making U the spouse of S's cousin.Step 6: The spouse of a cousin is generally treated as brother in law or sister in law.Step 7: Since U is female, she is the sister in law of S. Verification / Alternative check:Picture a family where two brothers P and Q each have one child. The child of P is S, and the child of Q is R. When R marries U, U becomes part of the extended family. The tie between S and U comes entirely through R. This is neither a direct sibling nor a parent child relation. In many standard exam explanations, the correct label for this relation is sister in law, which is the matching option provided. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Mother in law of S: For this, U would need to be the mother of S's spouse, which is not given.Sister of S: Sisters share the same parents, which is not the case here.Mother of S: P is explicit parent of S; U is not in the parental generation.Cousin of S: R is the cousin; U is an in law connected through R. Common Pitfalls:Candidates sometimes think only siblings of a spouse can be brothers in law or sisters in law and forget that in many exam questions the spouse of a cousin is also treated as a sister in law. It is crucial to read the question in the context of commonly used relations in reasoning problems, where cousin's spouse often falls under the in law category. Final Answer:U is the sister in law of S.

Question 11

A man says to a lady, "Your mother's husband's sister is my mother." In this blood relation puzzle, how is the man related to the lady?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This blood relation problem uses a layered phrase involving the mother and father of the lady and a sister of the father. The man identifies this woman as his own mother. Our goal is to determine how the man and the lady are related. Problems like this test careful reading of expressions such as your mother's husband's sister and the ability to translate them into a clear family tree. Given Data / Assumptions:• The lady has a mother.• The husband of the lady's mother is the lady's father.• The sister of this father is the lady's paternal aunt.• The man says this paternal aunt is his own mother.• Standard family structure is assumed with no hidden complexities. Concept / Approach:Your mother's husband is the father of the lady. The sister of that father is the lady's aunt on the father's side. When the man says that this aunt is his mother, he is saying that he is the child of the lady's paternal aunt. A child of one's aunt is a cousin. Therefore, the man is the cousin of the lady. This is the central insight that transforms the nested phrase into a simple cousin relationship. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Let the lady's mother be M and her father be F.Step 2: The phrase your mother's husband points to F, the lady's father.Step 3: The sister of F is the lady's paternal aunt, call her A.Step 4: The man says that A is his mother.Step 5: If A is the man's mother, then the man is her child.Step 6: The lady is the child of F, who is the brother of A.Step 7: Children of a brother and a sister are first cousins, so the man and the lady are cousins. Verification / Alternative check:We can draw a small family tree with grandparents at the top and their two children F and A beneath them. F has the lady as his child, and A has the man as her child. The lady and the man therefore share the same grandparents and are in the same generation. This is precisely the structure of first cousins. There is no information in the question that suggests any other relationship such as sibling or nephew would be more appropriate. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Brother of the lady: For this to be true, the man and the lady would need to share the same parents; instead they share grandparents.Son of the lady: This would place the man in a younger generation, contradicting the role of his mother as the aunt of the lady.Nephew of the lady: A nephew is child of one's sibling, but the man is child of the lady's aunt, not her sibling.Uncle of the lady: An uncle would be a sibling of her parent, not the child of that sibling. Common Pitfalls:Some candidates misread your mother's husband's sister as somehow pointing back to the lady herself, which leads to confusion. It is important to break the phrase into steps and to recognise that the final woman identified is the paternal aunt of the lady. From there, the idea that the man is the child of this aunt quickly leads to the correct cousin relationship. Final Answer:The man is the cousin of the lady.

Question 12

In a symbolic family notation, "A + B" means A is the father of B, "A − B" means A is the mother of B, "A * B" means A is the brother of B, and "A % B" means A is the sister of B. Given the expression "P + Q * R − S", how is Q related to S?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This question uses symbolic notation to represent family relations. Each operator has a specific meaning, and the expression "P + Q * R − S" combines several operators. We are asked to find how Q is related to S. Questions like this appear regularly in reasoning tests and require careful interpretation of both the order and the meaning of the symbols. Given Data / Assumptions:• "A + B" means A is father of B.• "A − B" means A is mother of B.• "A * B" means A is brother of B.• "A % B" means A is sister of B.• The expression is "P + Q * R − S".• Operators connect people pairwise from left to right when interpreted. Concept / Approach:We interpret each operator step by step. First, "Q * R" means Q is brother of R. Next, "R − S" means R is mother of S. The relation "P + Q" establishes that P is father of Q but is not directly needed to answer how Q is related to S. Once we know R is the mother of S and Q is brother of R, we can see that Q is the maternal uncle of S. The uncle relation is exactly what is represented in the options by uncle of S. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Interpret "Q * R". This tells us that Q is brother of R.Step 2: Interpret "R − S". This tells us that R is mother of S.Step 3: From step 2, S is child of R, and R is female.Step 4: From step 1, Q and R are siblings, with Q male (brother).Step 5: A male sibling of a child's mother is the child's maternal uncle.Step 6: Therefore Q is the uncle of S.Step 7: The segment "P + Q" simply tells us that P is father of Q and does not change the relation between Q and S. Verification / Alternative check:Consider a small family where P has a son Q. Q has a sister R. R is the mother of S. The roles fit "P + Q * R − S". In that structure, Q is uncle of S. No other standard relation such as brother or father can hold between Q and S without contradicting the mother relationship between R and S and the sibling relationship between Q and R. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Husband of S: This would require a spousal link, which is not mentioned.Brother of S: A brother would share parents with S, but Q is sibling of S's mother, not of S.Father of S: The father would be the husband of R, not the brother of R.Cousin of S: Cousins are children of siblings, but Q and R are siblings, and S is child of R, not child of Q. Common Pitfalls:One common mistake is to misinterpret the order of operations and attach the wrong relation to the wrong pair. Another is to forget that Q * R fixes Q as a sibling of R, not as a spouse. Always interpret each operator carefully and construct the family links slowly to avoid misclassifying the relationship. Final Answer:Q is the uncle of S.

Question 13

Pointing to a woman, a girl says, "Her daughter in law is married to the only son of my husband's mother in law." In this blood relation question, how is the girl related to the woman?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This puzzle mixes several in law relations. A girl refers to her husband, her husband's mother in law and the only son of that woman. She then links this son to the daughter in law of the woman she is pointing at. The question is to decide how the girl herself is related to that woman. This kind of problem is common in reasoning tests and often requires converting in law words back to ordinary family relations like mother and son. Given Data / Assumptions:• The speaker is a married girl.• Her husband's mother in law is her own mother.• The only son of her mother is her brother.• The daughter in law of the woman being pointed to is married to this only son.• The daughter in law of a woman is the wife of that woman's son. Concept / Approach:First, we identify my husband's mother in law. The mother in law of a husband is his wife's mother. Therefore this person is the speaker's mother. The only son of this mother is the speaker's brother. The woman in the question has a daughter in law who is married to this only son. That means the woman's son is that only son, and so the woman is the mother of the speaker's brother. A woman who is mother of a brother of the speaker is also mother of the speaker. Therefore the speaker is the daughter of the woman she is pointing at. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Let the speaker be G and her husband be H.Step 2: The mother in law of H is the mother of G, because husband's mother in law is wife's mother.Step 3: The only son of G's mother is G's brother, call him B.Step 4: The statement says the daughter in law of the woman being pointed to is married to this only son B.Step 5: The daughter in law of a woman W is the wife of W's son.Step 6: If W's daughter in law is the wife of B, then W's son is B.Step 7: Since B is already identified as the son of G's mother, the woman W must be that same mother.Step 8: Therefore the woman pointed at is the mother of G.Step 9: From G's perspective, she is the daughter of the woman. Verification / Alternative check:Draw the scenario: one woman M has a daughter G and a son B. B is her only son. G marries H. For H, the mother in law is M. The only son of M is B. B marries a woman who then becomes the daughter in law of M. If G says the daughter in law of that woman is married to the only son of my husband's mother in law, she is clearly talking about M as that woman, and B as the son. This confirms that G is the daughter of the woman she points at. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Niece of the woman: A niece would be a daughter of a sibling, not of the woman herself.Granddaughter of the woman: A granddaughter would be a child of a son or daughter, one generation lower than G.Cousin of the woman: Cousins are in the same generation and share grandparents, not a parent child link.Sister in law of the woman: A sister in law would be either spouse of a sibling or sibling of a spouse, not a direct child. Common Pitfalls:The chief difficulty is interpreting my husband's mother in law correctly as my own mother and then correctly tracking who the only son is. Some candidates confuse the role of daughter in law and treat her as a child instead of a spouse. Keeping aware that daughter in law always means wife of a son clarifies the structure quickly and leads to the realisation that the woman must be the speaker's mother. Final Answer:The girl is the daughter of the woman she is pointing at.

Question 14

Golu is the son of Bhola. Sheetal is the daughter of Golu. Chitra is the daughter of Dilip, and Dilip is the brother of Bhola. In this family relation problem, how is Chitra related to Sheetal?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This blood relation question describes a family with Bhola and his brother Dilip, along with the next generation children Golu and Chitra, and the younger child Sheetal. The goal is to determine how Chitra is related to Sheetal. The problem checks understanding of how cousin and aunt relationships appear across two generations. Given Data / Assumptions:• Golu is son of Bhola.• Sheetal is daughter of Golu.• Dilip is brother of Bhola.• Chitra is daughter of Dilip.• Standard family structure is assumed. Concept / Approach:First we see that Bhola and Dilip are brothers, so their children Golu and Chitra are first cousins. Sheetal is the daughter of Golu, meaning she is one generation below Golu. From Sheetal's perspective, Golu is her father and Chitra is her father's cousin. In many family relation questions, a cousin of a parent is treated as an aunt or uncle of the child. Therefore, Chitra, who is Golu's cousin, is considered an aunt of Sheetal in the extended family sense. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Bhola and Dilip are brothers, so they belong to the same generation.Step 2: Golu is son of Bhola, so Golu is one generation below Bhola.Step 3: Chitra is daughter of Dilip, so she is also one generation below Dilip.Step 4: Since Bhola and Dilip are brothers, Golu and Chitra are first cousins.Step 5: Sheetal is daughter of Golu, so she is one generation below Golu.Step 6: Looking from Sheetal's viewpoint, Chitra is a cousin of her father.Step 7: In many reasoning questions, cousins of parents are treated as aunts or uncles of the child, so Chitra is an aunt of Sheetal. Verification / Alternative check:Draw three levels: at the top, Bhola and Dilip. In the next generation, Golu as son of Bhola and Chitra as daughter of Dilip. Finally, Sheetal as daughter of Golu at the bottom level. We see that Chitra is in the same generation as Sheetal's father but is not his sibling, she is his cousin. That makes her an elder relative in the generation above Sheetal. The conventional label for a female relative of that generation in puzzle questions is aunt, not cousin from the child's perspective. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Sister of Sheetal: This would require Chitra and Sheetal to share the same parents, which they do not.Mother of Sheetal: Sheetal's mother is not identified as Chitra; her father is Golu.Mother in law of Sheetal: This requires a spouse of Sheetal and a parent of that spouse, which is beyond the information given.Cousin of Sheetal: Cousin exactly describes the relationship between Golu and Chitra; from Sheetal's view, Chitra is one generation above and functions as an aunt. Common Pitfalls:Many candidates stop at the idea that Golu and Chitra are cousins and then incorrectly label Chitra as a cousin of Sheetal as well. The key is to observe generational levels. Since Sheetal is a generation below Golu and Chitra, Chitra is in the same generation as her father and is better described as an aunt. This subtle but important distinction is what the examiner is testing. Final Answer:Chitra is an aunt of Sheetal.

Question 15

A and B are a married couple. X and Y are brothers, and X is also the brother of A. In this family relation problem, how is Y related to B?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This is a short blood relation question involving a married couple A and B, and two brothers X and Y. We are told that X is the brother of A and that X and Y are brothers. The task is to decide how Y is related to B. This problem checks ability to recognise in law relationships, particularly the idea of brother in law. Given Data / Assumptions:• A and B are married to each other.• X and Y are brothers.• X is the brother of A.• All relations are within one extended family. Concept / Approach:If X is the brother of A, then X is a brother in law of B because A and B are married. Y is also a brother of X, so Y is another brother of A. That means A has two brothers, X and Y. As a result, Y is also a brother in law of B. The main idea is that siblings of one spouse are brothers in law or sisters in law to the other spouse. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Identify A and B as a married couple.Step 2: X is given as the brother of A, which makes X a sibling of A.Step 3: From the marriage, A's brother X is a brother in law of B.Step 4: X and Y are brothers, so Y is also a sibling of A.Step 5: Any sibling of A is a brother in law or sister in law of B.Step 6: Since Y is male, he is a brother in law of B. Verification / Alternative check:Think of A and B as a couple. A has two brothers X and Y. These brothers are not directly related by blood to B, but they enter the family through the marriage. B will refer to both X and Y as brothers in law. There is no indication that Y is a cousin, uncle or any other type of relative. The simplest and direct relationship is brother in law. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Brother of B: That would require Y to share parents with B, which is not stated.Son in law of B: A son in law would be a husband of B's child, not a sibling of B's spouse.Cousin of B: Cousins share grandparents, which is not suggested by the information.Uncle of B: An uncle is a brother of a parent or spouse of an aunt, which is not consistent here. Common Pitfalls:Sometimes candidates see multiple brothers and quickly think of cousins or more distant relations. However, the presence of a clear married couple A and B and the identification of X as brother of A strongly guides us to the in law framework. Once we see that X is brother in law of B, it is easy to extend the same logic to Y as another brother of A. Final Answer:Y is the brother in law of B.

Question 16

Showing a man on the stage, Rita says, "He is the brother of the daughter of the wife of my husband." In this verbal reasoning blood relation question, how is the man on the stage related to Rita?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This classic blood relation question involves Rita, her husband, the wife of her husband and the daughter of that wife. It then refers to the brother of that daughter and asks how this man on the stage is related to Rita. The question is designed to test recognition that the wife of my husband is simply me and to identify the relationship correctly after that simplification. Given Data / Assumptions:• Rita is married, so she has a husband.• The phrase the wife of my husband refers to Rita herself.• The daughter of the wife of Rita's husband is the daughter of Rita.• The man on the stage is described as the brother of this daughter.• Normal family structure holds. Concept / Approach:The key simplification is to recognise that the wife of my husband is just another way of saying I, because Rita is the only wife of her husband. Therefore, the daughter of the wife of my husband is Rita's daughter. The man is the brother of that daughter, so he is another child of Rita, specifically her son. From Rita's perspective, the man is therefore her son. The puzzle is testing whether we correctly interpret the slightly roundabout phrase for herself. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Interpret the phrase my husband. This clearly refers to Rita's husband.Step 2: The wife of my husband must be Rita herself, because she is the person speaking.Step 3: The daughter of the wife of my husband is the daughter of Rita.Step 4: Thus, the daughter in the description is Rita's daughter.Step 5: The man on the stage is the brother of this daughter.Step 6: If he is the brother of Rita's daughter, he must be another child of Rita.Step 7: Since he is male, he is the son of Rita. Verification / Alternative check:Consider Rita and her husband with two children, a girl and a boy. The girl is the daughter of the wife of Rita's husband, and the boy is the brother of that daughter. When Rita points to the boy and describes him as the brother of the daughter of the wife of my husband, she is indirectly saying he is her own son. Any attempt to interpret the wife of my husband as someone else would contradict the normal monogamous assumption in these questions. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Husband of Rita: The husband of Rita is the same person as my husband in her statement, not the brother of her daughter.Cousin of Rita: A cousin would be in the same generation and not directly connected through her daughter in this way.Nephew of Rita: A nephew would be child of her sibling, not sibling of her daughter.Brother in law of Rita: A brother in law would be brother of her husband or spouse of her sister, which is not supported here. Common Pitfalls:Some candidates get confused by the phrase wife of my husband and forget that it simply refers to the speaker in such puzzles. Once that is recognised, the rest of the problem is easy because the daughter is clearly the speaker's daughter and the man is a sibling of that daughter. Keeping track of which person is speaking and simplifying such phrases early is a useful strategy in similar questions. Final Answer:The man on the stage is the son of Rita.

Question 17

When Anil saw Manish, he recalled, "He is the son of the father of my wife." Who is Manish to Anil?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This verbal reasoning question is about blood relations expressed in a compact sentence. The task is to unpack the phrase "son of the father of my wife" and then work out how that person is related to Anil. Such questions are very common in competitive exams and often test whether you can translate a verbal description into a simple family tree. Given Data / Assumptions: Anil is the speaker. Anil says about Manish, "He is the son of the father of my wife." "My wife" refers to Anil spouse. "Father of my wife" is Anil father-in-law. "Son of the father of my wife" means a male child of Anil father-in-law. We assume a standard monogamous family with no hidden complications unless mentioned. Concept / Approach:The idea is to rewrite the relationship slowly. First identify the person at the centre, in this case "father of my wife", and then find his son. After that, compare this person with Anil to decide whether he is a brother, brother-in-law, cousin, or some other relation. The key is to notice that Anil is talking about his wife father and that any son of this man, other than Anil wife, is his brother-in-law. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: The phrase "my wife" clearly refers to Anil spouse.Step 2: "Father of my wife" is the man who is Anil father-in-law.Step 3: "Son of the father of my wife" is a male child of Anil father-in-law.Step 4: The children of Anil father-in-law are Anil wife and her brothers or sisters. A son among them is Anil wife brother.Step 5: Therefore, the person described, Manish, is the brother of Anil wife.Step 6: The brother of one spouse is called a brother-in-law with respect to the other spouse. So Manish is Anil brother-in-law. Verification / Alternative check:Imagine concrete names. Suppose Anil is married to Priya, whose father is Raj. Raj has two children, Priya and Manish. When Anil says "son of the father of my wife", he means "son of Raj", which is Manish. Manish is then brother of Priya and brother-in-law of Anil. This matches the logical deduction above. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Manish cannot be Anil real brother because they do not share the same parents; the description connects Manish to Anil wife family, not to Anil own parents. He is not a cousin, because cousins are usually children of uncles or aunts, not direct children of a spouse father. He is not Anil uncle or father-in-law, because those roles are in an older generation than Anil, whereas Manish is in the same generation as Anil wife. Common Pitfalls:A frequent mistake is to stop at "son of the father of my wife" without realising that this just means "my wife brother". Some learners also confuse father-in-law and brother-in-law when working quickly. A good habit is to always start from the inside phrase, find that person clearly, and then move outwards step by step. Final Answer:Manish is Anil brother-in-law.

Question 18

P and Q are sisters. R and S are brothers. The daughter of P is the sister of R. What is the relation of Q to S?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This blood relation question combines two pairs of siblings and a child to test whether you can correctly place everyone in a family tree. The challenge is to understand how the daughter of P being the sister of R connects P and Q to R and S, and then to identify the correct relation between Q and S. Given Data / Assumptions: P and Q are sisters, so they are in the same generation and both female. R and S are brothers, so they are in the same generation and both male. The daughter of P is the sister of R. Being sisters means that P daughter and R share the same parents. We assume full siblings with the same two parents unless otherwise stated. Concept / Approach:The key idea is that if P daughter is the sister of R, then P must be a parent of R or married to a parent of R. That makes P the mother of R and S in typical exam style reasoning. Once that is clear, Q, being P sister, becomes the maternal aunt of R and S. The question then asks for the relation of Q to S, which is aunt. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Let P daughter be called D for clarity.Step 2: The statement says that D is the sister of R. This means D and R are children of the same parents.Step 3: One of those parents is P, because D is the daughter of P. Hence P is a parent of D and, by the shared parent assumption, also a parent of R.Step 4: Since R and S are brothers, S is another child of the same parents who gave birth to R. Therefore, S is also a child of P and P spouse.Step 5: Thus P is the mother of R and S, and P daughter D is their sister.Step 6: Q is the sister of P. Since P is the mother of S, Q is P sister and therefore S maternal aunt.Step 7: The question asks, "What is Q relation to S?" So the answer is aunt. Verification / Alternative check:Assign sample names. Let P and Q be sisters named Preeti and Quena. Let Preeti have a daughter, Dia. We are told that Dia is the sister of R. For Dia and R to be siblings, they must share the same parents, which include Preeti. So Preeti is also R mother. S is the brother of R, so S is another child of Preeti. Hence, Quena is the sister of S mother. From S point of view, Quena is his maternal aunt. This matches our conclusion. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Q cannot be S mother because that role is already taken by P. Q cannot be the grandmother, because she is in the same generation as S mother, not one generation above. She is not S own sister, because they are in different generations. Cousin is also incorrect because cousins are children of siblings, not siblings of parents of someone. Common Pitfalls:A common error is to assume that if P and Q are sisters, then Q must be a kind of mother figure to S, but that ignores the information that P daughter is R sister. Another mistake is to forget that R and S are brothers and therefore share the same parents, which forces S to be a child of P as well. Drawing a small diagram with generations labelled usually prevents these mistakes. Final Answer:Q is related to S as his aunt.

Question 19

Mohan says, "This girl is the wife of the grandson of my mother." How is Mohan related to that girl?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This problem is a classic example of generation based blood relation reasoning. The phrase "wife of the grandson of my mother" needs to be converted into a simple family relationship. The ultimate goal is to find how Mohan stands with respect to the girl he is talking about. Given Data / Assumptions: Mohan is the speaker. He refers to "my mother", who is one generation above Mohan. The "grandson of my mother" is a male grandchild of Mohan mother. The girl in question is "the wife of that grandson". We assume the normal situation that the grandson referred to is Mohan own son in typical exam style unless the wording forces a different interpretation. Concept / Approach:First we need to locate the grandson. Mohan mother has children, including Mohan himself and possibly Mohan siblings. The sons of those children are her grandsons. The most straightforward and exam friendly interpretation is that Mohan is one of her children and that her grandson here is Mohan own son. Once that is accepted, the wife of that grandson becomes Mohan daughter-in-law, which means that Mohan is her father-in-law. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Mohan mother is one generation above him, in the grandparent level of Mohan children.Step 2: The "grandson of my mother" is any male child of one of Mohan mother children. In particular, if Mohan has a son, that son is naturally a grandson of Mohan mother.Step 3: In exam questions, unless they explicitly force a cousin scenario, "grandson of my mother" is usually intended to be "my son".Step 4: Therefore, the grandson mentioned is taken to be Mohan son.Step 5: The girl is described as "the wife of the grandson". So she is married to Mohan son.Step 6: A woman who is married to a man son is his daughter-in-law, and the man is her father-in-law.Step 7: Thus Mohan is related to the girl as her father-in-law. Verification / Alternative check:Take an example with names. Let Mohan mother be Shanti. Shanti has a son Mohan. Mohan has a son Raj. Raj is a grandson of Shanti. If Raj marries a girl named Anu, then Anu is the wife of the grandson of Mohan mother. From Mohan point of view, Anu is his daughter-in-law. That directly matches the relationship father-in-law. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Mohan is not the girl husband because the girl is married to Mohan son, not to Mohan himself. He is not her direct father, because that would make the grandson his own son and also her brother, which contradicts the description of her as the wife. He is not her grandfather, because there is no extra generation gap implied between Mohan and his son wife. Common Pitfalls:Some learners confuse "grandson of my mother" with "my grandson", which would put Mohan one generation higher and might lead to the wrong idea that he is the girl grandfather. However, if the grandson is Mohan grandson, then his parent is Mohan child, not Mohan himself, and the age levels stop matching the intended exam pattern. The simplest and most standard reading is that the grandson of Mohan mother is Mohan son. Final Answer:Mohan is the girl father-in-law.

Question 20

The brother-in-law of Nisha father is the brother of Neha. How is Nisha related to Neha?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This question uses the term brother-in-law in a slightly indirect way and then connects that person to another woman, Neha. The goal is to find how Nisha is related to Neha. Such problems test your understanding of in-law relations and your ability to track who belongs to which generation. Given Data / Assumptions: Nisha has a father, and we are told about the brother-in-law of Nisha father. The brother-in-law of Nisha father is the brother of Neha. So there is a man X who is both brother-in-law of Nisha father and brother of Neha. We use the common exam convention that the brother-in-law of a person is usually either the brother of that person spouse or the husband of that person sister. We want to know how Nisha is related to Neha, that is, the relationship from Neha point of view. Concept / Approach:To make the problem solvable and consistent with the answer choices, we take X to be the brother of Nisha mother. In that case X is Nisha maternal uncle and also Neha brother. If X is the brother of both Nisha mother and Neha, then Nisha mother and Neha are sisters. That makes Nisha the daughter of Neha sister, so Nisha is Neha niece. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Let X be the man who is the brother-in-law of Nisha father and also the brother of Neha.Step 2: If X is the brother-in-law of Nisha father, he can reasonably be taken as the brother of Nisha mother in standard reasoning questions.Step 3: Thus X is the brother of Nisha mother and also the brother of Neha.Step 4: If one man X is the brother of Nisha mother and of Neha, then Nisha mother and Neha are sisters.Step 5: As Nisha is the daughter of her mother, and her mother is the sister of Neha, Nisha is the daughter of Neha sister.Step 6: A daughter of one sister is called a niece with respect to the other sister.Step 7: Therefore Nisha is the niece of Neha, or in other words, Nisha is related to Neha as niece. Verification / Alternative check:Take example names. Let Nisha father be Raj and her mother be Suman. Let Suman have a brother Vivek. Vivek is the brother of Nisha mother, so he is brother-in-law of Raj. Suppose Neha is Vivek sister as well. That makes Suman and Neha sisters, with Vivek their common brother. Nisha is the daughter of Suman, so from Neha point of view Nisha is the daughter of her sister, that is, her niece. This aligns exactly with the deduction made earlier. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Nisha is not Neha sister, because they are not children of the same parents; instead, Nisha mother and Neha are sisters. Nisha cannot be Neha mother or mother-in-law as she is in the younger generation. Cousin is also incorrect because cousins are usually children of siblings, while here Nisha is clearly one generation below Neha. Common Pitfalls:Many students get confused by the term brother-in-law and sometimes treat it as referring to the husband of Nisha father sister instead. While that arrangement is also possible, the question is designed so that a clear and simple path exists: the brother of Nisha mother and the brother of Neha are the same person, leading naturally to Nisha as Neha niece. Drawing a small tree with generations labelled helps keep everything clear. Final Answer:Nisha is related to Neha as her niece.

Blood Relation Test Questions

Questions

Practice smarter