Question 1

A family of six persons A, B, C, D, E and F has six different professions: Lawyer, Doctor, Teacher, Salesman, Engineer and Accountant. There are two married couples. D, the Salesman, is married to the lady who is the Teacher. The Doctor is married t…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is a classic logical reasoning and blood relation puzzle combined with assignment of professions. You must track who is married to whom, who is the child of whom and which profession belongs to each family member. The goal is to identify A's profession using all clues without violating the conditions about marriages, genders, generations and unique professions. Given Data / Assumptions: - Family members: A, B, C, D, E and F. - Professions (all distinct): Lawyer, Doctor, Teacher, Salesman, Engineer, Accountant. - D is the Salesman and is married to the lady who is the Teacher. - The Doctor is married to the Lawyer. - F is the Accountant, son of B and brother of E. - C is the Lawyer and is the daughter-in-law of A. - E is the unmarried Engineer. - A is the grandmother of F. - There are exactly two married couples in total. Concept / Approach: The key is to assign professions and relationships step by step, always respecting uniqueness and the marriage structure. Start by fixing obvious ones (Salesman, Engineer, Accountant, Lawyer) and then deduce who must be the Doctor and Teacher. The information that C is the daughter-in-law of A, and that A is grandmother of F, helps you place generations and determine who is married to whom. Once you know which members already have professions, the remaining unchecked profession must belong to A. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: From the statements, fix some professions immediately: - D is the Salesman. - F is the Accountant. - C is the Lawyer. - E is the Engineer and is unmarried. Step 2: The Doctor is married to the Lawyer. Since C is the Lawyer and is the daughter-in-law of A, C must be married to A's son. Therefore, C's husband is the Doctor and is a child of A. Step 3: Among A, B, D, E, F only B can still be the Doctor, because D, E and F already have fixed professions, and A is the grandmother of F and hence belongs to an older generation. So B is the Doctor and is married to C, the Lawyer. This is one married couple. Step 4: F, the Accountant, is the son of B and brother of E. Since B and C are a couple, F and E are their children. E is unmarried, which fits the data. Step 5: A is the grandmother of F. Therefore, A is the mother (or mother-in-law) of B or of C. But C is already daughter-in-law of A, so A must be the mother of B, placing A one generation above B. Step 6: D, the Salesman, is married to the lady Teacher. All professions except Doctor, Lawyer, Salesman, Engineer and Accountant are taken, leaving only Teacher unassigned. A and D are the only remaining people without professions assigned. Step 7: The Salesman is D, and he is married to the lady Teacher. The only female left without a profession is A. Therefore, A must be the Teacher, and D is A's husband, forming the second married couple. Verification / Alternative check: List assignments: A – Teacher, D – Salesman (married couple); B – Doctor, C – Lawyer (married couple); F – Accountant (son of B and C); E – Engineer (unmarried child of B and C). A is the grandmother of F (through her son B), and C is indeed daughter-in-law of A. There are exactly two married couples, and each profession is used once. All conditions are satisfied, confirming that A must be the Teacher. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Lawyer: C is explicitly stated to be the Lawyer. - Doctor: B must be the Doctor to marry C, the Lawyer, so A cannot also be a Doctor. - Engineer: E is already assigned as the unmarried Engineer. - None of these: Since Teacher fits A perfectly and satisfies all clues, this option is incorrect. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake is to forget that there are exactly two married couples and to try to marry B with someone other than C. Another pitfall is not noticing that C, as daughter-in-law of A, forces B to be A's son and the Doctor. Students also sometimes leave A's profession as ambiguous because she is older, but careful elimination shows Teacher is the only consistent option. Final Answer: A's profession is Teacher.

Question 2

Veeru is the brother of the son of Raghu's son. What is the relationship of Veeru to Raghu?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This is a short but layered blood relation question that uses a phrase like the son of Raghu's son and then adds that Veeru is the brother of that person. The challenge is to track generations correctly. When you see X's son, you move one generation down; when you see brother of that son, you typically stay in the same generation but possibly add another child of the same parent. Given Data / Assumptions: - Raghu has a son (call him R1). - R1 has a son (call him S1). - Veeru is the brother of S1. - brother means Veeru and S1 share at least one parent and are in the same generation. - We assume standard meanings of father, son and brother. Concept / Approach: Start by building a small chain from Raghu downwards. Raghu's son is one generation below Raghu. The son of Raghu's son is two generations below Raghu, that is, a grandson. Any brother of that grandson will also be a grandson of Raghu, because he is another child of Raghu's son. The approach is therefore to place each person on a family tree and read off the relationship of Veeru to Raghu. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Let Raghu's son be R1. Then R1 is Raghu's child and belongs to the generation just below Raghu. Step 2: The son of Raghu's son is the son of R1, say S1. This makes S1 a grandson of Raghu (two generations below Raghu). Step 3: Veeru is the brother of S1. That means Veeru is also a child of R1, just like S1. Step 4: Therefore, Veeru is also one generation below R1 and two generations below Raghu, making him a grandson of Raghu. Step 5: So, Veeru's relationship to Raghu is grandson. Verification / Alternative check: Assign some names with generations: Generation 1 – Raghu; Generation 2 – his son R1; Generation 3 – R1's children S1 and Veeru. From Raghu's viewpoint, everyone in Generation 3 who is a child of his child is his grandchild. Veeru is clearly in that group. This quick generational check confirms the conclusion. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Brother: Veeru is not in the same generation as Raghu; he is two generations below. - Cousin: Cousins share grandparents but belong to the same generation relative to those grandparents. Veeru is a direct grandson of Raghu, not a cousin. - Nephew: A nephew would be the son of Raghu's sibling or Raghu's wife's sibling, which is not described here. - Son: Raghu's son is R1. Veeru is the son of R1, making him a grandson, not a son, of Raghu. Common Pitfalls: A typical mistake is to stop at son of Raghu's son and label that person as grandson, then forget that Veeru is the brother of this grandson, not the grandson himself. However, both children of R1 are equally grandchildren of Raghu. Another pitfall is to mix up nephew and grandson when reading such stacked descriptions. Always count how many generations down from the original person you have moved. Final Answer: Veeru is Raghu's grandson.

Question 3

Pointing towards a girl, Chetan said, "She is the daughter of the only child of my grandmother." How is Chetan related to that girl?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question focuses on understanding phrases like only child of my grandmother and then taking the daughter of that person. You must carefully identify who the only child is, and then how their daughter is related to both the grandmother and to Chetan. Once that is clear, you can determine whether Chetan is a brother, father, husband or something else to the girl mentioned. Given Data / Assumptions: - Speaker: Chetan. - The girl being pointed at is the daughter of the only child of Chetan's grandmother. - The grandmother has exactly one child. - Chetan is a grandchild of that same grandmother. - We assume standard meanings for only child, daughter and grandmother. Concept / Approach: If Chetan's grandmother has only one child, then that single child must be either Chetan's father or Chetan's mother. There are no other children at that generation. The girl in question is the daughter of that only child, which makes her a child of Chetan's parent. Therefore, she must be one of Chetan's own siblings. Since the girl is explicitly described as female, the likely relationship between Chetan and the girl is that of brother and sister. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify the only child of my grandmother. Because Chetan is a grandchild of this grandmother, her only child must be Chetan's parent. Step 2: The girl is the daughter of that only child. So she is the daughter of Chetan's parent. Step 3: Being a daughter of Chetan's parent makes the girl a child in the same generation as Chetan. In other words, she is Chetan's sister. Step 4: The question asks how Chetan is related to that girl. If the girl is his sister, and Chetan is male, then Chetan is her brother. Step 5: So the relation from Chetan to the girl is brother. Verification / Alternative check: Visualise a simple family tree: Grandmother at the top, one child in the next generation, and then two grandchildren in the next: Chetan and the girl. Both grandchildren share the same parent (the only child of the grandmother). In such a tree, the relationship between the two grandchildren is unmistakably brother and sister if one is male and the other is female. This confirms the conclusion. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Father: For Chetan to be the girl's father, he would have to be a generation above her, which he is not; they share a parent instead. - Son: The question asks how Chetan is related to the girl, not how she is related to him. - Husband: That would imply they are married, which contradicts the sibling relationship derived from the common parent. - Uncle: An uncle would be the brother of the girl's parent, but Chetan is the child of that parent, not a sibling of the parent. Common Pitfalls: Many students get confused by the phrase only child of my grandmother and imagine some aunt or uncle, forgetting that the speaker himself must descend from that person if the grandmother has only one child. Another mistake is to lose track of generations and place Chetan one level too high or too low. Always ask: whose child is whose, and which generation does each person occupy. Final Answer: Chetan is the girl's brother.

Question 4

A girl introduced a boy as the son of the daughter of the father of her uncle. Who is the boy to the girl?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This blood relation question uses a long chain: the son of the daughter of the father of her uncle. You must break this phrase into smaller parts such as uncle, uncle's father and that father's daughter, and then see which familiar relatives they correspond to. Finally, you compare the boy's position in the family with the girl's position to work out whether he is her brother, cousin, nephew or something else. Given Data / Assumptions: - Reference person: a girl (call her G). - She has an uncle. - We interpret her uncle as her father's brother (paternal uncle), which is the standard assumption in exam questions unless otherwise specified. - The father of her uncle is then her grandfather on her father's side. - The daughter of that grandfather is one of his daughters, typically G's paternal aunt. - The boy is the son of that daughter. Concept / Approach: Start from the phrase her uncle and move stepwise upwards and then downwards in the family tree. Her uncle's father is her grandfather. A daughter of that grandfather is a sister of G's father, that is, G's paternal aunt. The boy is then the son of G's paternal aunt. Children of aunts and uncles are cousins to the girl. So we expect the boy to be her cousin. The challenge is to resist the temptation to treat the daughter as G's mother, which would be wrong here. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Her uncle is taken as her father's brother (paternal uncle). Step 2: The father of her uncle is the father of her father as well, so he is G's paternal grandfather. Step 3: The daughter of the father of her uncle is a daughter of G's grandfather. That daughter is G's paternal aunt (her father's sister). Step 4: The boy is the son of that daughter, which means he is the son of G's paternal aunt. Step 5: A son of an aunt is a cousin to G. Therefore, the boy is G's cousin. Verification / Alternative check: Draw a small family diagram: at the top, the grandfather; one level below, his children – G's father, G's uncle (father's brother) and G's aunt (father's sister). On the next level, you place G as the daughter of the father, and the boy as the son of the aunt. Comparing their positions, both are grandchildren of the same grandfather but through different parents, which is exactly the definition of cousins. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Son: For the boy to be G's son, G would have to be from a generation above the boy, which is not supported here. - Brother: A brother would share both parents with G. Here, the boy's mother is G's aunt, not G's mother. - Nephew: A nephew would be the son of G's sibling, but the boy is the son of G's aunt, not of her sibling. - Uncle: An uncle is a brother of a parent or the husband of an aunt, not a child of an aunt. Common Pitfalls: One common confusion is to interpret father of her uncle as father of her father and then daughter of that father as her mother. However, the phrase clearly indicates a daughter of the grandfather, which, on the paternal side, is an aunt rather than the mother (who is generally not described as daughter of paternal grandfather in these puzzles). Keeping generations and typical exam assumptions clear helps avoid this trap. Final Answer: The boy is the girl's cousin.

Question 5

Pointing towards a man, Ritika said, "He is the son of my grandfather's only son." How is Ritika related to that man?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is centered around the phrase my grandfather's only son. When a person says my grandfather's only son, that person is normally referring to their father, because grandfather's only son is the only male child of the grandfather. The man pointed at is the son of that only son, so you must work out how Ritika is placed in the same family and what her relationship is to the man. Given Data / Assumptions: - Speaker: Ritika. - The man is the son of Ritika's grandfather's only son. - Ritika shares the same grandfather. - Only son means the grandfather has exactly one son. - We assume that this only son is Ritika's father (the standard exam assumption). Concept / Approach: If Ritika's grandfather has exactly one son, he must be the father of all grandchildren from his line, including Ritika. Thus, my grandfather's only son is Ritika's father. The man is then the son of Ritika's father, making him one of Ritika's siblings. If Ritika is female and the man is male, then the relationship between Ritika and the man is that of sister and brother, specifically Ritika being the sister of the man. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Interpret grandfather's only son. Since Ritika is a grandchild, her grandfather's only son is her father. Step 2: The man is described as the son of that only son. So the man is the son of Ritika's father. Step 3: Children of the same father (and typically the same mother in these puzzles) are siblings to one another. Step 4: Ritika is female and the man is male, and both are children of the same father. Thus, Ritika is the man's sister. Step 5: Therefore, Ritika is related to the man as his sister. Verification / Alternative check: Draw a small family tree: Grandfather at the top, his only son (Ritika's father) below. Under the father, place his children: Ritika and the man. From the perspective of either child, the other is a sibling. Specifically, since Ritika is a girl and the other is a boy, he is her brother and she is his sister. This confirms the verbal reasoning. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Aunt: Ritika would be an aunt only to the children of her sibling, not to the sibling himself. - Mother: Being the sister of the man does not make her his mother; they are of the same generation. - Wife: Spouses typically come from different families or at least are not immediate siblings; this would violate standard family norms in such questions. - Cousin: Cousins share grandparents, but they are children of different parents. Here, both are children of the same father. Common Pitfalls: A common error is to confuse grandfather's son with uncle. In this puzzle, the phrase only son is critical: if the grandfather has only one son, that son must be the father of the speaker, not an uncle. Another pitfall is ignoring the gender of the speaker and the pointed person, which helps determine whether the answer is brother or sister from the speaker's viewpoint. The question explicitly asks how Ritika is related to the man, so the correct phrasing is sister. Final Answer: Ritika is the man's sister.

Question 6

Conditions: I is the brother of J. K is the father of I. L is the brother of M and M is the daughter of J. Under these conditions, who is I to L?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This blood relation problem gives a set of conditions about four people: I, J, K, L and M. You are told how they are related as siblings, parents and children, and then asked to determine how I is related to L. The main skill needed is to recognise which generation each person belongs to and how children of one person relate to siblings of that person. Given Data / Assumptions: - I is the brother of J. - K is the father of I (and therefore also the father of J). - L is the brother of M. - M is the daughter of J. - We assume usual definitions: father, brother, daughter, etc. Concept / Approach: First, place K at the top as the father. Then place I and J as siblings in the next generation. Next, J has a daughter M, so M is one generation below I and J. L is M's brother, so he is also a child of J, at the same generation as M. Once this family structure is in place, you can examine how J's children relate to J's brother I. Typically, the children of your sibling are your nieces and nephews, meaning you are their uncle or aunt. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: From I is brother of J and K is father of I, we place K as parent, with children I and J in the next generation. Step 2: From M is daughter of J, we place M as J's child, one generation below I and J. Step 3: From L is brother of M, L is another child of J, in the same generation as M. Step 4: So J's children are M (daughter) and L (son). I is J's brother, so I is the paternal uncle of M and L. Step 5: The question asks: who is I to L? Since L is the son of J and I is J's brother, I is L's uncle. Verification / Alternative check: Sketch a family tree: at the top, K; next level, K's children I and J; below J, his children M and L. The relationship lines show that I is one generation above L and is a sibling of L's parent. By definition, a sibling of a parent is an uncle (if male) or aunt (if female). Since I is described as brother of J, we know I is male, so he is specifically an uncle to L. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Grandfather: A grandfather would be the father of L's father or mother. That role is K, not I. - Son: I is clearly one generation above L, not below. - Brother: A brother of L would share the same parents and generation. I belongs to the previous generation and is the brother of J, not of L. - Cousin: Cousins are children of siblings, but here, I is the sibling of J, not the child of another sibling. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes mistakenly treat I and L as cousins because they share a common ancestor K, but cousins are defined as children of siblings, not siblings of parents. Another common error is to lose track of which child belongs to which parent and misplace M and L in the diagram. Always anchor the parent–child relations first and only then deduce cross-generational relationships. Final Answer: I is L's uncle.

Question 7

Pointing to a lady, a man said, "The son of her only brother is the brother of my wife." How is the lady related to the man?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question combines in-law relationships with blood relations. A man talks about a lady, her only brother and the son of that brother, who is described as the brother of his wife. Your task is to connect these people and identify how the lady stands in relation to the man. Such puzzles test your ability to map family structures across two connected families (the man's own family and his wife's family). Given Data / Assumptions: - Reference person: a man. - A lady is being pointed out. - The lady has only one brother. - The son of that only brother is the brother of the man's wife. - The wife's brother is the man's brother-in-law. - We assume standard definitions of father-in-law, mother-in-law and so on. Concept / Approach: Start by focusing on the phrase the brother of my wife. That person is the wife's brother and belongs to her parental family. We are told that this same person is the son of the lady's only brother. From this, we deduce that the lady's only brother must be the father of the wife and her brother, making him the man's father-in-law. Once we know the identity of the father-in-law, the lady becomes the sister of that father-in-law. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Let the man be M and his wife be W. Step 2: The brother of my wife is W's brother (call him B). By definition, B is the son of W's parents. Step 3: The statement says: The son of her only brother is the brother of my wife. Her refers to the lady being pointed at. So B, the wife's brother, is the son of the lady's only brother. Step 4: If B is the son of the lady's only brother, and B is also W's brother, then W must be another child of that same only brother. That is, the lady's only brother is W's father. Step 5: If the lady's only brother is W's father, then that man is M's father-in-law. Step 6: The question asks how the lady is related to M. Since she is the sister of M's father-in-law, she is the sister of his father-in-law. Verification / Alternative check: Construct a small tree: Put W's father (F) and W's aunt (the lady) as siblings. F has two children: W and B. From M's perspective, F is father-in-law, W is wife and B is brother-in-law. The lady stands as F's sister. Therefore, her relationship to M is exactly sister of father-in-law. No other close label fits as precisely in standard family terminology. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Sister: For the lady to be M's sister, she would have to share a parent with M directly, which is not indicated. - Mother: The lady is the sister of W's father, not W's mother and not M's mother. - Mother-in-law: The mother-in-law is W's mother. Here the lady is related through W's father, not described as his wife. - Aunt (in generic sense): While she is indeed aunt to W, the specific relationship to M is best described as sister of father-in-law, which is more precise than simply aunt. Common Pitfalls: One common error is to jump to the conclusion that the lady must be the man's mother-in-law because she is connected to his wife's family. However, mother-in-law would require her to be W's mother, not her father's sister. Another frequent mistake is to misread her only brother as the man's brother, which derails the logic. Carefully tracking who her refers to and who is whose parent prevents such confusion. Final Answer: The lady is the man's sister of father-in-law.

Question 8

A is the sister of B, who is the mother of C. C is the mother of D. E is the grandmother of D. How is C related to E?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This puzzle links two generations of one family with an additional person E, who is stated to be the grandmother of D. You know that C is D's mother, and B is C's mother, so B is also a grandmother of D. The task is to place E in relation to these people so that all clues fit and then determine how C is related to E. This type of question tests your ability to recognise that a child can have two grandmothers (maternal and paternal). Given Data / Assumptions: - A is the sister of B. - B is the mother of C. - C is the mother of D. - E is the grandmother of D. - A, B, C and D are already inside one line of descent. - We assume E is a different person from B, since a separate letter is used. Concept / Approach: From the chain B → C → D, B is clearly one grandmother of D (the maternal grandmother). The question also mentions that E is the grandmother of D, so E must be the other grandmother, that is, the paternal grandmother (the mother of D's father). In that case, C is the wife of E's son and therefore E's daughter-in-law. The key concept is that D has two grandmothers: one from the mother's side and one from the father's side. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: B is the mother of C and C is the mother of D, so B is the maternal grandmother of D. Step 2: E is also described as the grandmother of D. Since B already occupies the role of maternal grandmother, and E is clearly a distinct person (different name), E must be D's paternal grandmother. Step 3: A paternal grandmother is the mother of D's father. Let D's father be F. Then E is the mother of F. Step 4: C is the mother of D and therefore the wife of F (D's father) in a typical family structure. Step 5: If E is the mother of F and C is the wife of F, then C is related to E as her daughter-in-law. Step 6: Thus, C is the daughter-in-law of E. Verification / Alternative check: Construct a family tree: generation 1 – E and B (in different lineages); generation 2 – F as E's son, B's children A and C; generation 3 – C and F are married and have D. From D's perspective, B is the mother of C and thus maternal grandmother; E is the mother of F and thus paternal grandmother. From E's perspective, C is her son's wife, that is, daughter-in-law. This diagram satisfies every statement in the question. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Sister: C and E are clearly from different generations; they cannot be sisters. - Daughter: If C were E's daughter, then E would be the grandmother of D via the maternal line, contradicting B's role as maternal grandmother. - Mother: C is the mother of D, not the mother of E. - Aunt: An aunt is a sibling of a parent. E is not positioned as C's sibling, and the relation being asked is C to E, not C to D. Common Pitfalls: A frequent error is to overlook that a child can have two grandmothers and to assume E must be the same as B. However, the use of a separate letter strongly implies a different person. Another pitfall is not distinguishing between maternal grandmother (mother's mother) and paternal grandmother (father's mother). Keeping track of which side of the family each person belongs to is essential in solving such questions. Final Answer: C is related to E as her daughter-in-law.

Question 9

Pointing to a lady, Diwakar said, "Her mother's only grandson is my son." How is that lady related to Diwakar?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In this blood relation puzzle, Diwakar talks about a lady and a particular grandson of the lady's mother. The key phrase is her mother's only grandson is my son. You must determine which of the lady's children could be this only grandson and how Diwakar must be related for his son to fit that role. From there, you can deduce how the lady is related to Diwakar himself. Given Data / Assumptions: - Speaker: Diwakar. - Reference lady: call her L. - L's mother has exactly one grandson. - That only grandson is Diwakar's son. - We assume a straightforward family structure: no stepchildren, and grandson means a son of any daughter or son of L's mother. Concept / Approach: If L's mother has exactly one grandson, he must be the son of exactly one of her children. Diwakar's son is that grandson. For Diwakar's son to be L's mother's grandson, Diwakar's son's mother or father must be L's mother's child. The most economical and standard assumption in such questions is that the lady L herself is that child. That makes Diwakar's son the son of L, and Diwakar the husband of L. Under this interpretation, L is Diwakar's wife. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Her mother's only grandson is my son means Diwakar's son is the only grandson of L's mother. Step 2: A grandson of L's mother must be a son of one of L's mother's children (for example, L or her siblings). Step 3: If we assume the simplest structure that suits exam style, L is the child whose son is that only grandson. Therefore, Diwakar's son is L's son as well. Step 4: If a boy is both L's son and Diwakar's son, Diwakar and L are the boy's parents and form a married couple. Step 5: Hence, L is the wife of Diwakar. Verification / Alternative check: Picture L's mother at the top. Below her, imagine one daughter L and no other children who have sons. L marries Diwakar. Their only son is then the sole grandson of L's mother. In this scenario, Diwakar's statement is exactly true, and the relationship between L and Diwakar is that of wife and husband. If L's mother had another child who also had a son, there would be more than one grandson, contradicting the phrase only grandson. Thus the described arrangement is consistent and minimal. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Aunt: L would be an aunt to Diwakar's son only if she were a sister of one of his parents; here she is depicted as a parent herself. - Sister: A sister of Diwakar would not normally produce a grandson of L's mother that is also Diwakar's son. - Mother: For L to be Diwakar's mother, Diwakar's son would be her great-grandson, not her mother's only grandson. - Sister-in-law: A sister-in-law relation would not naturally make Diwakar's son the unique grandson of L's mother without adding extra assumptions. Common Pitfalls: Students sometimes try to place Diwakar as a brother or brother-in-law of L and then force the grandson relation through multiple siblings. This quickly leads to contradictions or extra grandsons. The phrase only grandson strongly suggests a single child of L's mother having a male child. Recognising that Diwakar's son is that child's son points directly to L being his wife. Final Answer: The lady pointed to by Diwakar is his wife.

Question 10

Pointing towards a boy, Meera said, "He is the son of the only son of my grandfather." How is that boy related to Meera?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question is almost symmetric to earlier ones: it uses the phrase the only son of my grandfather and then the son of that person. You must figure out how this boy is placed relative to Meera. The word only is important, as it ensures that the grandfather has exactly one son, strongly suggesting that this son is Meera's father in standard exam logic. Given Data / Assumptions: - Speaker: Meera. - Her grandfather has only one son. - The boy is the son of that only son. - We assume that the only son of the grandfather is Meera's father. - Meera is one of the children of this only son. Concept / Approach: If Meera's grandfather has a single son, that son is logically her father rather than an uncle, because there is no other male child for the grandfather. The boy in question is another child of this same father, so he is in the same generation as Meera and shares the same parent. Therefore, the relationship between Meera and the boy is that of siblings. Given the boy is male, he is Meera's brother and she is his sister. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Recognise that my grandfather's only son refers to Meera's father, since there is exactly one son to carry the line. Step 2: The boy is the son of this only son, so the boy is a son of Meera's father. Step 3: Meera herself is also a child of her father, so both she and the boy share the same father. Step 4: Children of the same father and mother are siblings. With the boy explicitly male, he is Meera's brother. Step 5: Hence, the boy is Meera's brother and Meera is his sister. Verification / Alternative check: Draw a simple tree: grandfather at the top, only son below him. The only son is Meera's father. On the next level, place Meera and the boy as the children of this father. In this configuration, both children share the same parent and stand in the same generation, which is precisely a sibling relationship. No other role like cousin or uncle fits the structure. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Cousin: Cousins are children of siblings. Here, both Meera and the boy share the same father, so they are siblings, not cousins. - Uncle: An uncle must be a brother of a parent or the husband of an aunt, not a sibling in the same generation. - Brother-in-law: A brother-in-law is either the brother of a spouse or the husband of a sibling; this is a marriage-based relation, not a direct blood sibling. - Nephew: A nephew is the son of a brother or sister. The boy is not a child of Meera's sibling but of Meera's father. Common Pitfalls: Sometimes students incorrectly treat my grandfather's son as an uncle and then assume the boy is a cousin. However, the word only is crucial: if there is only one son, and Meera is a grandchild, that son is her father, not some other relative. Always pay attention to words like only, elder, younger that reduce ambiguity in these questions. Final Answer: The boy is Meera's brother.

Question 11

Pointing to the lady on the platform, Manju said, "She is the sister of the father of my mother's son." How is the lady related to Manju?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This problem uses the phrase my mother's son, which is a common way to indirectly refer to oneself or to a brother, and then talks about the father of that person and the sister of that father. You must decode whose father is being referred to, then reach his sister, and finally see how that lady is related to Manju. Given Data / Assumptions: - Speaker: Manju. - The lady is described as the sister of the father of my mother's son. - My mother's son could be Manju herself (if Manju is male) or Manju's brother (if Manju is female). - The father of my mother's son is Manju's father. - The lady is the sister of Manju's father. Concept / Approach: The core is to understand that my mother's son refers to a child of the same parents as the speaker. The father of this child is simply the speaker's father. The lady is then the sister of this father, which is a classic definition of a paternal aunt. Therefore, from Manju's perspective, the lady is her aunt. The gender of Manju is not crucial; the relationship through the parents remains the same. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Interpret my mother's son. This phrase means a male child of Manju's mother. That could be Manju himself (if Manju is male) or Manju's brother (if she is female), but in either case, the child shares the same mother as Manju. Step 2: The father of my mother's son is the husband of Manju's mother, that is, Manju's father. Step 3: The lady on the platform is described as the sister of this father, making her the sister of Manju's father. Step 4: The sister of one's father is one's paternal aunt. Step 5: Therefore, from Manju's perspective, the lady is her aunt. Verification / Alternative check: Imagine a small family: Manju's parents (father and mother) at one level and their children (including Manju) at the next. The phrase my mother's son points to one of those children. The father of that son is the same father for all those children. Now add the lady as a sister of that father. In a normal family tree, that person is always an aunt to the children of her brother. This confirms the answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Mother: Manju's mother is the wife of his father, not the sister of his father. - Sister: A sister of Manju would share the same parents and belong to the same generation, not be a sibling of Manju's father. - Niece: A niece would be the daughter of Manju or of Manju's sibling, a generation below Manju, not above. - Grandmother: A grandmother is the mother of a parent, not the sister of a parent. Here the lady is explicitly called a sister of Manju's father, not his mother. Common Pitfalls: Some learners mistakenly read my mother's son as my mother's brother and then lose track of generations. Another pitfall is thinking that the sister of the father of my mother's son is somehow the mother's sister, which is not correct in the given wording. Always convert complex phrases like my mother's son into simpler, familiar relations such as my brother or myself. Final Answer: The lady is Manju's aunt.

Question 12

A family consists of six members P, Q, R, X, Y and Z. Q is the son of R, but R is not the mother of Q. P and R are a married couple. Y is the brother of R. X is the daughter of P. Z is the brother of P. Who is the brother-in-law of R?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This puzzle combines gender clues with marital and sibling relationships. You are told who is married to whom, who is a son or daughter of whom, and which people are brothers. Using this, you must work out who is the brother-in-law of R. Brother-in-law can mean either the brother of one's spouse or the husband of one's sibling, so we must consider both possibilities. Given Data / Assumptions: - Family members: P, Q, R, X, Y, Z. - Q is the son of R, but R is not the mother of Q, so R is the father of Q. - P and R are a married couple (so P is R's wife). - Y is the brother of R (Y is male and sibling of R). - X is the daughter of P (child of P and R, female). - Z is the brother of P (male sibling of P). Concept / Approach: Once we know that R is male (father of Q) and is married to P, we can search for people who qualify as his brother-in-law. A brother-in-law might be (a) a brother of R's spouse P, or (b) a husband of R's sister. The statements tell us that Z is the brother of P, so Z is a brother of R's wife. That already makes Z a brother-in-law of R. We must also check if Y could qualify via the second definition, but we have no information that Y is married to R's sister, so the safe and supported answer is Z. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: From Q is the son of R but R is not the mother of Q, we infer that R is male (the father of Q). Step 2: P and R are a married couple, so P is R's spouse. Step 3: X is the daughter of P, and since P is married to R, X is a child of P and R in the next generation. Step 4: Y is the brother of R, so Y is R's male sibling. Step 5: Z is the brother of P, so Z is the male sibling of R's spouse P. Step 6: By definition, the brother of one's spouse is a brother-in-law. Therefore, Z is a brother-in-law of R. Step 7: Y is simply R's own brother, not a brother-in-law, and no information suggests that Y is married to R's sister, so we do not classify Y as R's brother-in-law. Verification / Alternative check: Visualise two families connected by marriage: R's parental family includes R and Y as brothers. P's parental family includes P and Z as siblings. When P and R marry, Z becomes R's brother-in-law (through his wife), and Y becomes P's brother-in-law. The network now contains exactly two married people P and R, one child Q (son) and one child X (daughter). All relationships are consistent, and Z is clearly the brother of R's spouse. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - P: P is R's wife, not his brother-in-law. - Y: Y is the brother of R, so he is a direct sibling, not an in-law. He could be an in-law to P, but the question is about R. - X: X is the daughter of P and R, belonging to a younger generation, so she cannot be R's brother-in-law. - Q: Q is the son of R, again a younger generation, not an in-law. Common Pitfalls: A frequent confusion is to treat any brother in the extended family as a brother-in-law. However, brother-in-law is an in-law relation, not a blood sibling. Another pitfall is forgetting that the spouse's brother qualifies as a brother-in-law. Keeping the two definitions of brother-in-law in mind and matching them against the data leads directly to Z. Final Answer: The brother-in-law of R is Z.

Question 13

Neelam, who is Deepak's daughter, says to Deepika, "Your mother Rekha is the younger sister of my father, who is the third child of Ramlal." How is Ramlal related to Deepika?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question describes a chain of relations involving Neelam, her father Deepak, Deepika, her mother Rekha and an elder Ramlal. You must use these relationships to find how Ramlal is related to Deepika. The key idea is that Rekha and Deepak are siblings, both being children of Ramlal, and that Deepika is Rekha's daughter. Given Data / Assumptions: - Neelam is Deepak's daughter. - Deepika's mother is Rekha. - Rekha is the younger sister of Deepak. - Deepak is the third child of Ramlal. - We assume Rekha is also a child of Ramlal, as she is Deepak's sister. - Deepika is the daughter of Rekha. Concept / Approach: Because Rekha and Deepak are siblings, they share the same parent(s). Deepak is stated to be the third child of Ramlal, so Ramlal is one of Deepak's parents. Therefore, Ramlal is also a parent of Rekha. Once we know that Rekha is a daughter of Ramlal and Deepika is the daughter of Rekha, it follows that Ramlal is Deepika's grandfather. The question asks specifically about Ramlal's relationship to Deepika, not vice versa. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Neelam says: Your mother Rekha is the younger sister of my father. So Rekha and Deepak are siblings. Step 2: If Rekha is the younger sister of Deepak, then they share at least one parent in common. Step 3: Deepak is described as the third child of Ramlal. That means Deepak is a child of Ramlal. Step 4: Since Rekha is Deepak's sister, it is natural in this exam context to treat Rekha as another child of Ramlal. Step 5: Deepika's mother is Rekha, so Deepika is the granddaughter of Ramlal through Rekha. Step 6: Therefore, Ramlal is Deepika's grandfather. Verification / Alternative check: Draw a family tree: At the top is Ramlal. In the next generation are his children, including Deepak (third child) and Rekha (younger sister of Deepak). In the next generation, from Rekha we place Deepika as her daughter; from Deepak we place Neelam as his daughter. Comparing levels, Ramlal is two generations above Deepika, so from Deepika's viewpoint, he is her grandfather. This matches the text and satisfies all given relationships. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Uncle: An uncle would be the brother of one's parent, not the parent of one's parent. - Father: Deepika's father is not mentioned; Rekha is her mother. Ramlal is the father of Rekha, not of Deepika. - Father-in-law: That would be the father of Deepika's husband and involves a different generation and marriage link, not described here. - Brother: A brother would be in the same generation as Deepika, which Ramlal clearly is not. Common Pitfalls: Some students misread the phrase third child of Ramlal as meaning that Ramlal is a child of someone else and confuse generations. Another mistake is to assume that Rekha might be a daughter-in-law instead of a daughter, but the line younger sister of my father clearly signals a sibling relationship, not an in-law relationship. Keeping generations straight and noticing who is the parent of whom prevents these errors. Final Answer: Ramlal is Deepika's grandfather.

Question 14

Introducing a man, a girl says, "He is the only son of my mother's mother." How is the man related to the girl?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This blood relation question is straightforward once you decode my mother's mother and then find her only son. The problem asks you to identify how that man is related to the girl introducing him. The key is understanding that my mother's mother is the girl's maternal grandmother, and her only son is therefore the girl's maternal uncle. Given Data / Assumptions: - Speaker: a girl. - The man is the only son of my mother's mother. - My mother's mother is the girl's maternal grandmother. - Only son means the grandmother has exactly one male child. - We assume standard terminology for maternal and paternal relatives. Concept / Approach: Start with my mother's mother, which is the maternal grandmother. Her only son would necessarily be a brother of the girl's mother, because both are children of the same grandmother. A brother of one's mother is called a maternal uncle. Therefore, this man is the girl's maternal uncle. The presence of both generic uncle and maternal uncle in the options requires you to pick the more specific and correct one. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Identify my mother's mother as the girl's maternal grandmother. Step 2: The only son of the girl's maternal grandmother is the grandmother's one male child. Step 3: Since the grandmother has both the girl's mother and this son as children, that son is the mother's brother. Step 4: A brother of one's mother is, by definition, a maternal uncle. Step 5: Therefore, the man being introduced is the girl's maternal uncle. Verification / Alternative check: If you draw a short tree, place the grandmother at the top; her children are the girl's mother and the man (her only son). The girl is then a child of the mother. From the girl's point of view, the man is in the same generation as her mother, is male and is her mother's brother. This is precisely the role of a maternal uncle. There is no indication that he is on the father's side, so paternal uncle and father are ruled out. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Uncle (generic) is less specific than maternal uncle; since the question clearly places the man on the mother's side, the correct refined term is maternal uncle. - Paternal Uncle would be a brother of the girl's father, which is not what my mother's mother's only son describes. - Father: The girl's father is not described; the man is explicitly her grandmother's son, not necessarily her parent. - Brother-in-law: This would be the husband of a sibling or the brother of a spouse, which is unrelated to the description given. Common Pitfalls: A frequent slip is to stop reading at uncle without noticing whether he is on the mother's or father's side. Another error is to reason that since he is the grandmother's only son, he might be the girl's father, but that would require additional information linking him directly as a parent. The question deliberately traces through the mother to make it clear that he is her brother, not her husband. Final Answer: The man is the girl's maternal uncle.

Question 15

A man pointing to a lady says, "Her brother is the father of my only son's sister." How is that lady related to the man?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In this puzzle, a man describes a lady using a chain involving his only son and that son's sister. The phrase my only son's sister is crucial because it effectively identifies his daughter. From there, we consider who the father of that daughter is and how this connects to the lady's brother, eventually revealing the relationship between the lady and the man. Given Data / Assumptions: - Speaker: a man (call him M). - He has an only son. - My only son's sister refers to M's daughter (if any). - The father of my only son's sister is the same man M, since he is the father of both children. - The lady's brother is said to be the father of my only son's sister. - Therefore, the lady's brother is M himself. Concept / Approach: Once you realise that the father of my only son's sister must be the speaker, the statement her brother is the father of my only son's sister means that the lady's brother is the speaker. If a woman's brother is a man, then that woman is the man's sister. So the connection collapses to the simplest possible: the lady is the speaker's sister. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: Interpret my only son's sister. M's only son has a sister, who must be M's daughter. Step 2: The father of my only son's sister is the father of M's daughter. Since M is the father of both his son and his daughter, this father is M himself. Step 3: The statement says: Her brother is the father of my only son's sister. We have just identified that father as M. Step 4: Therefore, her brother is M. In other words, the lady's brother is M. Step 5: If the lady's brother is M, then from M's point of view, that lady is his sister. Verification / Alternative check: Think of a simple family: M has two children, a son and a daughter. The father of my only son's sister is clearly M. Now introduce a lady L such that her brother is M. L then belongs to the same generation as M and shares at least one parent with him. L is therefore M's sister. The verbal description perfectly matches this simple interpretation, and there is no need to invent more complex structures like in-laws. Why Other Options Are Wrong: - Sister of father-in-law: This would place the lady as an aunt of M's wife, not directly as M's sibling. - Daughter-in-law: A daughter-in-law is married to M's son, not described through being a sibling of M. - Daughter: For the lady to be M's daughter, M would be described as her father, not her brother. - Aunt: An aunt is typically a sibling of a parent. Here, the lady is explicitly the sibling of the speaker himself. Common Pitfalls: Students often get confused by the phrasing my only son's sister and might think of that person as a niece or in-law. Remember that siblings usually share parents, so a son's sister is a daughter of the same parent, not an external relation. Another pitfall is forgetting that the father of my child's sibling is simply me in a normal family setup, causing unnecessary complexity. Final Answer: The lady is the man's sister.

Question 16

Pointing towards a photograph, Kiran said to Chotu, "I am the only daughter of this lady and her son is your maternal uncle." How is Kiran related to Chotu's father?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Here, Kiran talks to Chotu about a lady in a photograph and about that lady's son, who is described as Chotu's maternal uncle. Kiran also states that she is the only daughter of this lady. You must trace how this connects Kiran to Chotu's family, and then specifically identify Kiran's relationship to Chotu's father. Given Data / Assumptions: - Speaker: Kiran. - Listener: Chotu. - Kiran says: I am the only daughter of this lady (in the photograph). - The same lady's son is Chotu's maternal uncle. - Maternal uncle means the brother of Chotu's mother. - We assume standard nuclear-family relationships. Concept / Approach: If the lady's son is Chotu's maternal uncle, that son must be the brother of Chotu's mother. That, in turn, makes the lady the mother of Chotu's mother, i.e., Chotu's maternal grandmother. Kiran is the only daughter of this same lady, so she is also a child of Chotu's maternal grandmother. Hence, Kiran and Chotu's mother are siblings. Since Kiran is female, she is Chotu's maternal aunt. An aunt of Chotu, if married, would be the wife of Chotu's father on the paternal side, but here we are asked how Kiran is related to Chotu's father through Chotu's immediate family. Step-by-Step Solution: Step 1: The lady's son is your maternal uncle means that this son is the brother of Chotu's mother. Step 2: If the lady is the mother of that son and that son is Chotu's mother's brother, then the lady is Chotu's maternal grandmother. Step 3: Kiran is the only daughter of this same lady, so Kiran is also a child of Chotu's maternal grandmother. Step 4: Therefore, Kiran and Chotu's mother are sisters (both daughters of Chotu's maternal grandmother). Step 5: As the sister of Chotu's mother, Kiran is Chotu's maternal aunt. Step 6: The question, however, asks: How is Kiran related to Chotu's father? Chotu's father is married to Chotu's mother. Kiran is the sister of his wife. Step 7: The sister of one's wife is one's sister-in-law. From Chotu's father's viewpoint, Kiran is his sister-in-law. But among the given options, the closest equivalent role that usually appears in such questions is wife when the puzzle is set up differently. In this particular original question format, Kiran is typically intended to be Chotu's mother, making her the wife of Chotu's father. Clarifying the Intended Exam Logic: In many standard versions of this puzzle, the combination of being the only daughter and the son being the maternal uncle leads to the conclusion that Kiran is actually Chotu's mother. If Kiran is Chotu's mother, then she is, by definition, the wife of Chotu's father. This matches the common answer key used for this pattern. Under that interpretation, the lady in the photograph is Chotu's grandmother, her son is the maternal uncle, and Kiran is the only daughter who is also Chotu's mother. Why Other Options Are Wrong (under the intended key): - Cousin: A cousin would share grandparents with Chotu but would not be the parent of Chotu. - Daughter: Kiran is not described as the daughter of Chotu's father; she is his spouse in the intended reading. - Sister: This would require Kiran and Chotu's father to share parents, which is not suggested. - Aunt: While Kiran can be viewed as aunt to Chotu in one reading, the question specifically asks about her relation to Chotu's father, not to Chotu himself. Common Pitfalls: This question can be interpreted in multiple ways if you overcomplicate the family structure. The typical exam convention keeps families as small as possible and uses only the necessary relations. Students sometimes forget that maternal uncle must be the brother of the mother, forcing the lady to be the mother of that brother and hence the grandmother. Recognising standard patterns for such questions helps align with expected answer keys. Final Answer: Under the usual intended exam interpretation, Kiran is related to Chotu's father as his wife.

Question 17

A and B are brothers, C and D are sisters, and the son of A is the brother of D. In this family, how is B related to C?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This blood relation question tests your ability to connect several simple family statements and identify the final relationship between two people. These problems are common in verbal reasoning sections of competitive exams and require careful tracking of parents, children, brothers and sisters without mixing them up. Given Data / Assumptions: A and B are brothers, so they share at least one common parent and are of the same generation. C and D are sisters, so they are also of the same generation and share at least one common parent. The son of A is the brother of D, which places that son and D as children of the same parent or parents. We assume a simple family structure with no half siblings unless forced by the data. Concept / Approach:The key idea is to identify who the parents of C and D are. Once that is clear, we can place B correctly relative to C. If the son of A is the brother of D, then that son and D are children of A. Since C is the sister of D, C must also be a child of A. That automatically makes B, who is the brother of A, an uncle of all of A's children including C and D. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: A and B are brothers, so B is of the same generation as A.Step 2: The statement that the son of A is the brother of D means A is a parent of D.Step 3: C and D are sisters, so C must have the same parent A as D.Step 4: Therefore, C is a child of A.Step 5: B is the brother of A, so B is the paternal uncle of C. Verification / Alternative check:Visualise a simple tree: place A and B as siblings. Under A, place three children: C, D and the unnamed son who is D's brother. Since C is clearly a child of A and B is the sibling of that parent, B must be the uncle of C. No other consistent reading turns B into a father, grandfather or cousin of C, because that would require extra unstated connections or different generations. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Father is wrong because the problem clearly states that C is a child of A, not of B.Brother is wrong because B is one generation above C.Grandfather is wrong because we are only told that A and B are brothers, not that B belongs to an older generation.Cousin is wrong because cousins are children of siblings, while B himself is that sibling. Common Pitfalls:A frequent mistake is to think that if A's son is the brother of D, then D must belong to a different family and A is only a partial parent. However, in standard reasoning questions, brother or sister implies at least one common parent. Another error is confusing uncle with cousin when dealing with similar ages. Always fix the generations first and then decide the correct relation name. Final Answer:B is related to C as her Uncle.

Question 18

M is the brother of N, B is also a brother of N, and M is the brother of D, but N is not a brother of D. In this situation, how is N related to D?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This blood relation puzzle is designed to check whether you pay attention to gender clues hidden in statements like is not a brother. The logic is simple, but many students rush and miss the twist about N's gender, which completely changes the answer. Given Data / Assumptions: M is the brother of N, so M is male and a sibling of N. B is also a brother of N, so B is another male sibling of N. M is the brother of D, so D is another sibling of M (and hence of N and B as well) in the same generation. N is explicitly stated to be not a brother of D. Concept / Approach:If M is brother of both N and D, then N and D are siblings too. The only issue is the gender of N. A person who is a sibling of D can be either a brother or a sister. The statement N is not a brother of D eliminates the brother possibility. Therefore, N must be a sister of D. The entire puzzle is basically about decoding that hidden gender information. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: From M is brother of N, note that N is a sibling of M.Step 2: From M is brother of D, we know D is also a sibling in the same family.Step 3: So M, N and D are siblings in one family group.Step 4: The puzzle says N is not a brother of D. In a sibling relationship there are two gender possibilities for N: brother or sister.Step 5: Since brother is ruled out, N must be D's sister. Verification / Alternative check:Imagine a family where parents have four children: M, N, B and D. The statement calls M and B brothers, and also calls M a brother of D. So M, B and D are clearly male siblings. When the question adds that N is not a brother, the only consistent way to keep N in the same sibling group is to treat N as female. That makes N the sister of D, which matches all the given clues. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Nephew and cousin imply different generations or different branches, but N is clearly a direct sibling of D.Brother is directly contradicted by the statement that N is not a brother of D.Aunt would belong to a generation above D, which the question does not indicate. Common Pitfalls:Many learners see words like brother repeatedly and unconsciously label everyone as male, ignoring the explicit phrase not a brother. Another mistake is thinking that not a brother means not a sibling at all, which is incorrect. The person can still be a sister. To avoid such errors, always separate generation (same or different) from gender and reason about each clearly. Final Answer:N is related to D as his Sister.

Question 19

Daya has a brother named Anil. Daya is the son of Chandra, and Bimal is the father of Chandra. In terms of relationship, who is Anil to Bimal?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This question checks basic understanding of three generation family trees. You are given a person, that person's parent and that parent's parent, and you must correctly trace how a sibling fits into the picture. These questions are easy if you draw a quick diagram or imagine a simple family tree. Given Data / Assumptions: Daya and Anil are brothers, so they share at least one parent. Daya is the son of Chandra, so Chandra is a parent of Daya. Bimal is the father of Chandra, so Bimal is one generation above Chandra. We assume that Anil is also a child of Chandra, since he is the brother of Daya. Concept / Approach:To find who Anil is to Bimal, first fix the generations. Bimal is the oldest generation here, Chandra is the next generation, and Daya and Anil form the youngest generation. A person in the youngest generation whose parent is the child of Bimal will be a grandchild of Bimal. Since Daya is explicitly described as the son of Chandra and Anil is his brother, Anil also fits into the same generation and parental link. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Note that Bimal is the father of Chandra, so Chandra is Bimal's child.Step 2: Daya is described as the son of Chandra, so Daya is Bimal's grandson.Step 3: Daya and Anil are brothers, so they share the same parent Chandra.Step 4: Since Anil is also a child of Chandra, he is another grandchild of Bimal.Step 5: Therefore, Anil is the grandson of Bimal. Verification / Alternative check:Draw a small family tree. Put Bimal at the top. Under Bimal, write Chandra. Under Chandra, write Daya and Anil as siblings. The relationship between the top generation and the bottom generation is always grandparent to grandchild. Nothing in the problem suggests adoption or step relationships, so the straightforward interpretation is correct. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Son is wrong because Chandra, not Anil, is the direct child of Bimal.Brother is wrong since Bimal is one generation above Anil, not his sibling.Grandfather is the relation of Bimal to Anil, not the other way around.Cousin requires two separate sibling branches, which the data does not introduce. Common Pitfalls:Students sometimes stop too early and say that Anil is a son of Chandra and hence wrongly guess son of Bimal. Always count the number of steps on the family tree. From Anil up to Bimal there are two steps: Anil to Chandra, and Chandra to Bimal. Two steps up from a person leads to a grandparent, so the person is a grandchild. Final Answer:In terms of relationship, Anil is the Grandson of Bimal.

Question 20

Looking at a portrait of a man, Akhil said, "His mother is the wife of my father's son. I have no brothers or sisters." Whose portrait was Akhil looking at?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This classic blood relation riddle appears in many competitive exams. It mixes a portrait, a description of relatives and a special condition about having no siblings. The challenge is to translate the verbal description into family roles and simplify step by step until you know exactly who the person in the portrait must be. Given Data / Assumptions: Akhil is speaking while looking at the portrait of a man. He says that the man's mother is the wife of my father's son. Akhil also says that he has no brothers or sisters, so he is an only child. We assume standard family structure with father, mother, spouse and children. Concept / Approach:The key is to decode the phrase my father's son when the speaker has no siblings. In that case, my father's son must be the speaker himself. Then the wife of my father's son is the wife of the speaker. If the mother of the man in the portrait is the wife of the speaker, then the man must be the speaker's child. Since the portrait shows a man, that child is his son. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Because Akhil has no brothers or sisters, the phrase my father's son refers only to Akhil himself.Step 2: The wife of my father's son therefore means the wife of Akhil.Step 3: Akhil says that the mother of the man in the portrait is this woman, the wife of Akhil.Step 4: If a woman is the wife of Akhil and also the mother of the man in the portrait, then Akhil is the father of that man.Step 5: Hence, the person in the portrait is the son of Akhil. Verification / Alternative check:Suppose, for a moment, that my father's son had referred to someone else, such as a brother. Then the wife of that person would be the sister-in-law of Akhil, and the man in the portrait would be the nephew of Akhil. However, the problem explicitly removes that possibility by stating Akhil has no brothers or sisters. This forces my father's son to be Akhil himself, and the logic then leads uniquely to the portrait being of his son. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Uncle is impossible because the description focuses on the man's mother being the wife of my father's son, which links directly to Akhil, not to an older generation.Nephew would occur only if my father's son meant a brother, which is ruled out.Cousin is not consistent with the direct parent link we find.Father would require the man's mother to be the grandmother of Akhil, which is not supported by the description. Common Pitfalls:The biggest mistake is ignoring the statement that Akhil has no brothers or sisters and assuming that my father's son is a brother. Once that happens, students often label the man in the portrait as a nephew. Always handle the condition about siblings first in these riddles. It usually locks down who my father's son or my mother's daughter must be, after which the rest of the deductions are straightforward. Final Answer:Akhil was looking at the portrait of his son.

Blood Relation Test Questions

Questions

Practice smarter