Question 1

Product–active substance analogy: “Cigarette : Tobacco” — select the option that mirrors the product→active substance relationship.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The relation is between a consumer product and its primary psychoactive or defining substance. A cigarette contains tobacco; analogously, brewed coffee contains caffeine as its notable active compound. Concept / Approach:Map to a pair where the right-hand term is the characteristic active component of the left-hand consumable. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Milk : Bottle → container, not a substance. Cigar : Filter → many cigars do not use filters; filter is not active substance. Shoes : Socks / Tea : Cup → accessory or container relations, not active substance. Final Answer:Coffee : Caffeine

Question 2

Role–goal analogy: “Traveller : Destination” — choose the pair that mirrors a person seeking an appropriate place/outcome.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The relation is “agent : place sought/needed.” A traveller aims to reach a destination. We need a similar pairing where an individual seeks a fitting place. Concept / Approach:“Refugee : Shelter” parallels “Traveller : Destination” by pairing a person with the place they need to reach for safety/protection. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Beggar : Donation → agent : object received; not a place. Accident : Hospital → event : place; not agent : place. Teacher : Education → agent : abstract domain; not destination. Author : Pen → agent : tool; not goal place. Final Answer:Refugee : Shelter

Question 3

Defection analogy: “Apostate : Religion” — select the pair that mirrors renunciation/betrayal of one’s allegiance in a comparable domain.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:An apostate is someone who abandons or renounces their religion. The analogy requires a similar relationship in civic/political allegiance. Concept / Approach:“Traitor” is one who betrays their country. This mirrors “apostate : religion” in the domain of political allegiance and loyalty. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Teacher : Education → professional role : domain; not renunciation/betrayal. Potentate : Kingdom → ruler : realm; not defection. Jailer : Law → custodian : legal system; not betrayal. Citizen : Vote → status : civic act; not renunciation. Final Answer:Traitor : Country

Question 4

Particular manifestation analogy: “Light : Glint” — choose the pair that stands in the same “phenomenon : brief instance” relation.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:“Glint” is a small flash or brief sparkle of light; thus, the relation is “broad phenomenon : brief/partial instance.” The correct parallel should reflect a similarly fleeting, minor, or specific expression of a broader sensory phenomenon. Concept / Approach:“Whiff” is a slight, passing smell—an instance or hint of “scent.” Hence, “Scent : Whiff” mirrors “Light : Glint.” Why Other Options Are Wrong: Tide : Wave → both are water motions with different scales; not a phenomenon vs. brief instance relation. Colour : Shade → category vs. degree/variation; not inherently brief. Sound : Blare → “blare” is a loud, sustained sound; not necessarily a brief instance. Heat : Season → mismatched categories. Final Answer:Scent : Whiff

Question 5

“Racism” (a prejudice based on race) relates to “Apartheid” (a specific system of racial segregation and discrimination). Choose the option that most closely mirrors this broad-prejudice → specific/characteristic manifestation relationship.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:An analogy can compare a broad ideology or prejudice with a more specific or emblematic manifestation. “Racism” is a general discriminatory belief system; “Apartheid” names a historically specific policy regime that institutionalized racial segregation. The task is to find a pair with the same broad-to-specific (or emblematic) relationship. Given Data / Assumptions: Racism is a general prejudice based on race. Apartheid is a specific, systematized practice grounded in racism. We seek another pair where the first term is a broad prejudice and the second is a common, recognizable instantiation or emblematic stance within that prejudice. Concept / Approach:The best parallel is “Sexism : Chauvinism,” where sexism is the broad prejudice based on sex or gender, and “(male) chauvinism” is a strongly biased attitude that exemplifies and expresses sexist beliefs. While not a governmental “system” like apartheid, it is a characteristic manifestation within the same prejudice domain, preserving the logic of broad → emblematic expression. Step-by-Step Solution:1) Identify relation type: general prejudice → specific/subtype expression.2) Map candidates: sexism (broad) → chauvinism (emblematic stance).3) Reject pairs that do not keep the same hierarchy or domain. Verification / Alternative check:“Parochialism : Linguism” mixes two different biases; the relation is not hierarchical. “Nationalism : Identity” is not prejudice → practice. “Communalism : Religion” mismatches a socio-political bias with the broader domain it exploits rather than a specific manifestation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Parochialism : Linguism: Both are biases; neither clearly specializes the other. Nationalism : Identity: Not a prejudice-to-manifestation mapping. Communalism : Religion: “Religion” is a domain, not a practice embodying communalism. Common Pitfalls:Confusing a domain or another independent bias with a specific manifestation of the same bias. Final Answer:Sexism : Chauvinism

Question 6

“Surgeon” is to the precise tool they use as “Scalpel” (the standard cutting instrument). Choose the pair that mirrors the specialist → principal tool relationship.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:Professional-tool analogies pair a specialist with a canonical instrument of their craft. A surgeon relies on a scalpel for precision cutting. We must find the option that similarly links a practitioner directly to a principal hand tool emblematic of their technique. Given Data / Assumptions: A surgeon’s iconic hand tool is a scalpel. The correct answer should name a practitioner and their specific, principal tool. Concept / Approach:Among the options, “Sculptor : Chisel” most closely parallels surgeon : scalpel. A chisel is the hallmark implement a sculptor wields to shape stone or wood, matching the direct, fine-control tool relationship. Other options either point to a general category (instrument), an output (cabinet), or a venue/appliance (oven) rather than a precise hand tool. Step-by-Step Solution:1) Identify relationship as expert → key hand tool.2) Evaluate options for a one-to-one mapping of craft to iconic tool.3) Select “Sculptor : Chisel.” Verification / Alternative check:Classic depictions of sculptors show chisels and mallets as defining implements, just as surgical imagery foregrounds the scalpel for precise incisions. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Musician : Instrument: Too broad; not a single specific tool. Carpenter : Cabinet: Output/product, not tool. Baker : Oven: Appliance/venue rather than a hand tool; not parallel to “scalpel.” Common Pitfalls:Choosing outputs or environments instead of the specialist’s hallmark instrument. Final Answer:Sculptor : Chisel

Question 7

“Horns” are characteristic of a “Bull.” Choose the pair that preserves the specific animal → characteristic appendage relation.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This analogy connects an animal with its characteristic natural appendage. Bulls commonly have horns; we must pick a pair showing a similarly specific and definitive appendage matched to the right animal. Given Data / Assumptions: Bull → horns is a classic animal-to-appendage mapping. We seek a unique, taxonomically apt pairing, not just any body part. Concept / Approach:“Antlers : Stag” is the closest structural match: antlers are the distinctive deciduous bony structures of male deer (stags). While other options feature real attributes, they vary in generality or category (e.g., “hoofs” are not unique to horses). The bull’s horns parallel the stag’s antlers as iconic head appendages of specific animals. Step-by-Step Solution:1) Identify that the relation is “animal → signature head appendage.”2) Compare options for uniqueness and specificity.3) Choose “Antlers : Stag.” Verification / Alternative check:In zoological context, antlers are strongly associated with stags; the mapping is as canonical as bull → horns. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Mane : Lion: True attribute, but mane is not an appendage and exists only in males; still, “antlers : stag” better mirrors “horns : bull.” Wattles : Turkey: Soft tissue adornment; less parallel to horns. Hoofs : Horse: Hooves are common to many ungulates; not as distinctive. Common Pitfalls:Confusing uniqueness with general attributes; seek the closest analog to horns. Final Answer:Antlers : Stag

Question 8

“Spider” is to the “Web” it creates. Choose the pair that preserves the maker → product/creation relationship.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:Creation analogies link a maker to the thing they produce. A spider produces a web. The goal is to select the relationship that best mirrors creator → creation within the options. Given Data / Assumptions: Maker creates a product (spider → web). The correct answer should keep direction (agent → artifact). Concept / Approach:“Poet : Poetry” preserves the same structure. A poet composes poetry, just as a spider spins a web. Other options invert or distort the relation: “Ink : Pen” reverses instrument-material; “Cock : Hen” pairs sexes of a species; “Teacher : Student” is a mentor-mentee relation, not creator → creation. Step-by-Step Solution:1) Identify relation type: maker → creation.2) Eliminate non-creation relations.3) Select “Poet : Poetry.” Verification / Alternative check:Both pairs evoke a creator producing a characteristic output (web vs poetry), maintaining the intended mapping. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Ink : Pen: Tool and material reversed; not creator → creation. Cock : Hen: Male–female; not a production relation. Teacher : Student: Instructional, not production. Common Pitfalls:Picking relationships that are associated but not production-based. Final Answer:Poet : Poetry

Question 9

“Jew” is associated with the place of worship “Synagogue.” Choose the option that correctly pairs another community with its customary place of worship.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This analogy tests general knowledge of religious communities and their places of worship. “Jew : Synagogue” is a standard mapping. We must choose the option that similarly and correctly maps a community to its recognized worship place. Given Data / Assumptions: Jews worship in synagogues. We seek another community → worship place mapping. Concept / Approach:“Buddhists : Pagoda” is correct and widely recognized, especially in East and Southeast Asia. The other options either mismatch the community to the place or pair a community with its scripture instead of a place. “Parsis : Temple” is imprecise; Zoroastrian places are “Fire Temples.” “Jains : Fire Temple” is incorrect (Jains worship in temples called Derasar/Basadi). “Hindus : Vedas” mismatches place with scriptures. Step-by-Step Solution:1) Confirm community → place pairs.2) Identify the single correct mapping.3) Select “Buddhists : Pagoda.” Verification / Alternative check:Standard references in world religions list pagodas (and monasteries/temples) as Buddhist places; the others are erroneous or ill-typed pairings. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Parsis : Temple: Too generic; the distinctive term is “Fire Temple.” Jains : Fire Temple: Incorrect; not a Jain place of worship. Hindus : Vedas: Scripture, not a place. Common Pitfalls:Confusing sacred texts with places of worship, or mixing communities’ places. Final Answer:Buddhists : Pagoda

Question 10

'Steel' is an “Alloy.” In the same way, “Zinc” should be classified as which of the following? Choose the most accurate category.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:Classification analogies test whether you can place items into correct scientific categories. Steel is correctly classified as an alloy (primarily iron with carbon and other elements). The question asks for the correct classification of zinc by analogy. Given Data / Assumptions: Steel → Alloy (mixture category). Zinc is a chemical element (symbol Zn, atomic number 30). We must not confuse elemental categories with mixture categories. Concept / Approach:Zinc is a metallic element, not an alloy (mixture) and not a non-metal or halogen. Therefore, none of the listed specific categories (non-metal, halogen, alloy) is correct for zinc, leaving “None of these” as the accurate choice. While zinc is used to make alloys (e.g., brass is copper + zinc), zinc itself is not an alloy. Step-by-Step Solution:1) Identify the category logic: composition/class vs element.2) Recognize zinc as a metal element.3) Since “metal” is not offered, and other options are wrong, select “None of these.” Verification / Alternative check:Periodic table classification labels zinc as a transition/post-transition metal; it is not a halogen or non-metal. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Non-metal: Zinc is metallic. Halogen: Halogens are Group 17 elements (F, Cl, Br, I, At, Ts), not zinc. Alloy: Zinc is a pure element, not a mixture. Common Pitfalls:Confusing “used in alloys” with “is an alloy.” Final Answer:None of these

Question 11

(32, 24, 8) — Select the optioned triple that follows the same structural rule as the given triple.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:Number-triple analogies frequently encode a structural relation among the three numbers. For (32, 24, 8), observe that 8 is the greatest common divisor (gcd) of 32 and 24. The task is to find the optioned triple where the third number equals gcd(first, second). Given Data / Assumptions: gcd(32, 24) = 8 matches the third element. We seek the option whose third element equals the gcd of the first two. Concept / Approach:Test each candidate quickly: gcd(26, 32) = 2 (≠ 42); gcd(34, 24) = 2 (≠ 14); gcd(24, 16) = 8 (matches 8); gcd(42, 34) = 2 (≠ 16). Only option (24, 16, 8) preserves the same structural rule. Step-by-Step Solution:1) Hypothesize the rule “third = gcd(first, second).”2) Compute gcd for each option.3) Select the triple where the equality holds: (24, 16, 8). Verification / Alternative check:Alternative simple rules (e.g., arithmetic differences) do not align across all options; the gcd pattern uniquely identifies the correct triple. Why Other Options Are Wrong: (26, 32, 42), (34, 24, 14), (42, 34, 16): their third terms do not equal the gcd of the first two numbers. Common Pitfalls:Testing only arithmetic differences and overlooking gcd/lcm structural relations. Final Answer:(24, 16, 8 )

Question 12

(81, 77, 69) — Identify the optioned triple that uses the same internal differences pattern as the given triple.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:Some triple analogies encode a sequence of signed differences between consecutive terms. For (81, 77, 69), the differences are −4 and −8 (i.e., 81−77 = 4, 77−69 = 8). The task is to choose the triple that follows the same “−4, then −8” pattern internally. Given Data / Assumptions: (81, 77, 69) → differences: −4, −8. We seek an option with the same ordered pair of differences. Concept / Approach:Check each candidate: (56, 52, 44) has differences −4 and −8 (since 56−52 = 4, 52−44 = 8). The others do not mirror this exact ordered pair of differences. Step-by-Step Solution:1) Extract the ordered differences from the stem (−4, −8).2) Compute differences for each option.3) Select the triple that matches (−4, −8): (56, 52, 44). Verification / Alternative check:A quick mental subtraction confirms the pattern; only option (a) aligns exactly with the stem’s internal differences. Why Other Options Are Wrong:They either have different magnitudes or a different order of differences. Common Pitfalls:Accidentally matching unordered differences; here the order matters (first gap, then second gap). Final Answer:(56 , 52 , 44 )

Question 13

“Valueless” appears to be the opposite of “Invaluable,” but “Invaluable” actually means “extremely valuable.” Choose the pair that similarly contrasts a negative quality with its positive counterpart.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This item plays on a common vocabulary trap: “invaluable” sounds like “without value,” but it actually means “priceless” or “extremely valuable.” The stem thus presents a misleading apparent antonym pair. We must choose a pair that, like the stem, sets a negative quality against its positive, countervailing counterpart. Given Data / Assumptions: “Valueless” (worthless) vs “Invaluable” (extremely valuable) form a high-contrast semantic pairing. We need a comparably strong contrast of dispositions or behaviors. Concept / Approach:“Miserly : Philanthropic” provides a clean antonymic contrast of traits around giving/using money and resources: “miserly” hoards; “philanthropic” gives generously. Other choices either compare degrees of price (“Costly : Cut-rate”), mix noun/quality without direct antonymy (“Frugality : Wealth”), or pair unrelated notions (“Thriftiness : Cheap” is not a true antonym set—thriftiness can be prudent, not “cheap”). Step-by-Step Solution:1) Identify that the stem is a contrast pair, not a synonym pair.2) Select the option with a clear negative ↔ positive trait opposition.3) Choose “Miserly : Philanthropic.” Verification / Alternative check:Dictionary senses confirm “invaluable” = extremely valuable, not worthless. The chosen pair mirrors a similarly stark opposition. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Costly : Cut-rate: Price descriptors, but not a value/virtue contrast. Frugality : Wealth: Category mismatch (a habit vs a possession level). Thriftiness : Cheap: Not strict antonyms; one can be thrifty without being cheap. Common Pitfalls:Assuming the “in-” prefix always negates; here it intensifies value. Final Answer:Miserly : Philanthropic

Question 14

“Thrust” is the characteristic action with a “Spear.” Choose the option that preserves a specific action → weapon relation.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:Action–instrument analogies connect a characteristic action to the implement designed for that action. “Thrust” is the quintessential spear action. In fencing, the épee is a thrusting weapon; the sport’s action “to fence” with an epee is dominated by thrusts rather than cuts. Given Data / Assumptions: Spear → thrusting action. Epee (in fencing) → primarily thrusting. Concept / Approach:“Fence : Epee” best mirrors action → weapon. Other options misalign the relation: “Scabbard : Sword” is container → contained; “Mangle : Iron” mismatches a verb and an appliance not analogous to the spear’s action; “Bow : Arrow” is launcher → projectile, not action → weapon. Step-by-Step Solution:1) Identify required mapping: characteristic action → proper weapon.2) Choose the fencing weapon used for thrusting (epee).3) Select “Fence : Epee.” Verification / Alternative check:In sport fencing, foil and epee score with thrusts; sabre adds cuts. The epee is a pure thrusting weapon, aligning tightly with “thrust : spear.” Why Other Options Are Wrong: Scabbard : Sword: Not action → weapon. Mangle : Iron: Not a standard action–instrument pairing. Bow : Arrow: Implements a launch, not a thrust action relation. Common Pitfalls:Confusing container, projectile, or appliance relations with action–weapon mappings. Final Answer:Fence : Epee

Question 15

“Money” functions as the medium for a “Transaction.” Choose the pair with the same medium → communicative act relation.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:Medium–activity analogies pair the tool or medium with the process it enables. Money is the medium of exchange used in transactions. We must select an option where a comparable medium enables a corresponding communicative act. Given Data / Assumptions: Money → Transaction (medium → economic act). We seek a parallel in communication. Concept / Approach:“Language : Conversation” mirrors the structure: language is the medium that makes conversation possible. “Ideas : Exchange” flips roles; ideas are what is exchanged, not the medium. “Water : Drink” is substance → action but not a standardized medium of an act in the same abstract sense; “Life : Death” is a contrast, not medium–activity. Step-by-Step Solution:1) Identify the abstract role “medium enabling act.”2) Map to communication: language enables conversation.3) Choose “Language : Conversation.” Verification / Alternative check:Economics frames money as a “medium of exchange”; linguistics frames language as the medium for verbal interaction (conversation). Why Other Options Are Wrong: Ideas : Exchange: Ideas are exchanged; they are not the medium. Water : Drink: Physical consumption relation, not a general enabling medium. Life : Death: Antonymous states. Common Pitfalls:Confusing objects of exchange with the medium of exchange. Final Answer:Language : Conversation

Question 16

“Sunrise” corresponds to “Sunset” as time-of-day opposites. Choose the pair that preserves a similarly canonical opposite-time relation.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:Temporal analogies often use pairs of canonical opposites or complements in the daily cycle. Sunrise and sunset mark opposite transitions of the sun’s apparent motion. We must select another well-established opposite pair in the daily time framework. Given Data / Assumptions: Sunrise ↔ Sunset are natural opposites. We need a similarly fixed-time opposite pair. Concept / Approach:“Noon : Midnight” fits: noon is the middle of the day; midnight the middle of the night—canonical opposites on a 24-hour clock. “Dawn : Twilight” are beginnings/ends of daylight but are not strictly opposite instants; “Morning : Night” are broad periods; “Energetic : Lazy” are adjectives, not times. Step-by-Step Solution:1) Recognize the stem uses precise, conventional time opposites.2) Select the option with equally precise time antonyms.3) Choose “Noon : Midnight.” Verification / Alternative check:On clocks and in astronomy, noon and midnight are formal opposites (12:00 vs 00:00), mirroring sunrise/sunset as opposite transitions. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Dawn : Twilight: Related transitions but not fixed opposites like noon/midnight. Morning : Night: Unequal spans; not point opposites. Energetic : Lazy: Not temporal. Common Pitfalls:Choosing loosely related periods instead of formal temporal opposites. Final Answer:Noon : Midnight

Question 17

“River” is to “Ocean” as a smaller path of flow is to a larger path of flow. Choose the pair that best mirrors this narrower-to-broader pathway relationship.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:Geographical analogies often model containment or convergence. Rivers flow into oceans; similarly, local narrow routes feed into broader thoroughfares. We must select the transportation analogue that preserves “smaller channel → larger channel.” Given Data / Assumptions: River → Ocean (narrower natural flow → broader body). We seek “smaller route → larger route.” Concept / Approach:“Lane : Road” is the closest structural match: a lane is narrower and often connects to or forms part of a broader road network. Other options are inclusion/association relations but not channel-size progressions (e.g., book → library is item → collection; child → school is participant → institution; cloth → body is covering → object). Step-by-Step Solution:1) Abstract the relation as narrower pathway feeds into broader one.2) Map to transport infrastructure.3) Choose “Lane : Road.” Verification / Alternative check:Transportation planning treats lanes/streets as lower hierarchy linking into arterial roads, paralleling tributaries into main channels. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Child : School: Person → institution; not a pathway hierarchy. Book : Library: Item → collection; not channel-size relation. Cloth : Body: Covering relation; unrelated to flow/hierarchy. Common Pitfalls:Confusing general containment with directional flow or hierarchy. Final Answer:Lane : Road

Question 18

“Glove” relates to the “Hand” it covers. Choose the option that preserves the wearable item → body part relation.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:Wearable–body analogies link an item of clothing to the body part it is designed to cover. Gloves are worn on the hands; socks are worn on the feet. The mapping should preserve the direction “wearable → body part,” not the reverse. Given Data / Assumptions: Glove → Hand is a direct wearable mapping. We seek a similar relation for another wearable. Concept / Approach:“Socks : Feet” mirrors the structure. The other choices misstate direction or type: “Neck : Collar” reverses wearable/body order; “Tie : Shirt” connects two garments; “Coat : Pocket” is garment → part of garment, not body part. Step-by-Step Solution:1) Fix direction: item worn → body part.2) Select the pair that maintains this mapping.3) Choose “Socks : Feet.” Verification / Alternative check:Everyday usage confirms the parallel (gloves on hands; socks on feet), preserving the exact relation type. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Neck : Collar: Reversed; collar is worn around neck. Tie : Shirt: Garment–garment relation, not garment–body. Coat : Pocket: Whole–part of garment, not body. Common Pitfalls:Overlooking directionality in analogies. Final Answer:Socks : Feet

Question 19

“Sound” that has been “Muffled” is a diminished/softened version. Choose the pair that similarly expresses a quality reduced in its intensity or vividness.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:Qualitative analogies map an item to a reduced-intensity state. “Muffled” describes sound that is softened or dulled. We need a parallel where a sensory attribute is comparably diminished from its full intensity or saturation. Given Data / Assumptions: Muffled sound = softened/dulled sound. Look for a similar reduction in a visual attribute. Concept / Approach:“Colour : Faded” matches perfectly: a faded colour is reduced in vividness/saturation. Other options do not represent reduction: “Moisture : Humid” indicates presence, not reduction; “Despair : Anger” are different emotions; “Odour : Pungent” is intensified rather than reduced. Step-by-Step Solution:1) Abstract the relation: stimulus → diminished quality.2) Choose a parallel in the visual domain.3) Select “Colour : Faded.” Verification / Alternative check:In everyday descriptors, “muffled” and “faded” are prototypical terms for reduced intensity in hearing and sight respectively. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Moisture : Humid: Indicates high moisture, not reduced. Despair : Anger: Not a reduction relation. Odour : Pungent: Increased intensity, opposite of the intended mapping. Common Pitfalls:Confusing any association with the specific “reduced intensity” relation. Final Answer:Colour : Faded

Question 20

“Carnivorous” classifies the “Panther” by diet. In the same way, “Herbivorous” classifies which animal among the options?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:Biological analogies often use dietary classifications. A panther is carnivorous (meat-eating). We must choose an animal that is herbivorous (plant-eating), preserving the classification relation from the stem. Given Data / Assumptions: Carnivorous → Panther (big cats are meat-eaters). Herbivorous → ? (choose a plant-eater). Concept / Approach:Among the options, buffalo is herbivorous (grazing on grasses/vegetation). Tiger, lion, and leopard are carnivorous big cats, so they do not fit the required herbivore classification. Step-by-Step Solution:1) Identify relation type: diet classification.2) Select the herbivore from the list.3) Choose “Buffalo.” Verification / Alternative check:Zoological references list bovines as herbivores; big cats are obligate carnivores. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Tiger, lion, and leopard are predators; not herbivores. Common Pitfalls:Assuming any large mammal could be herbivorous without checking taxonomy and diet. Final Answer:Buffalo

Analogy Questions

Questions

Practice smarter