Question 1

In this analogy based on biological classification, Frog is related to Amphibian as Lizard is related to which class of animal: Frog : Amphibian :: Lizard : ?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This analogy question examines your basic knowledge of animal classification. In the pair Frog : Amphibian, frog is the animal and amphibian is the class or group it belongs to in biological taxonomy. You are asked to identify a similar relationship for lizard. Understanding broad animal classes like amphibians, reptiles, mammals and insects is important for many competitive exams. Given Data / Assumptions: A frog is known to be an amphibian, living both in water and on land. A lizard is a familiar small animal often seen on walls and in gardens. The options include Rodent, Mammal, Reptile and Insect, which are different biological or descriptive categories. We assume the standard school level biological classification of animals. Concept / Approach:The relationship in Frog : Amphibian is animal : class. We must determine the correct class that includes lizards. Lizards are cold blooded, scaly animals that lay eggs on land, which are key characteristics of reptiles. Therefore, we identify the option that names this class. The other options either refer to different classes or to narrower groups within mammals. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Confirm the relationship in the given pair. Frog is an individual animal species, and amphibian is the class of animals that live both on land and in water.Step 2: Identify the second animal in the analogy, which is Lizard.Step 3: Recall that lizards, snakes, crocodiles and turtles are all examples of reptiles.Step 4: Examine the options: Rodent, Mammal, Reptile and Insect.Step 5: Recognise that rodents are a subgroup of mammals that includes animals like rats and mice, not lizards.Step 6: Mammal is the class for animals like humans, cows and dogs, which are warm blooded and have hair, not scales.Step 7: Insects are small invertebrates with six legs, such as ants and flies, which also does not fit lizards.Step 8: Reptile is the only class that correctly includes lizards. Verification / Alternative check:We can verify by forming parallel descriptive statements: "A frog is an amphibian" and "A lizard is a reptile." Both statements are scientifically accurate and mirror the animal class relationship. None of the other classes in the options fit lizards according to basic biology, which confirms that Reptile is the correct choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Option A, Rodent, describes a type of mammal, not lizards. Option B, Mammal, is incorrect because lizards do not share mammalian traits such as hair and live birth in most cases. Option D, Insect, refers to small six legged invertebrates, which lizards clearly are not. Hence, these options do not match the required animal : class relationship for lizard. Common Pitfalls:Some candidates may confuse reptile and amphibian or may not recall the basic animal groups clearly. Others may loosely associate lizards with insects because both can be small and found around homes. To avoid such mistakes, revise standard classifications like amphibians, reptiles, mammals, birds and insects and link each to familiar examples. Final Answer:The correct completion of the analogy is Reptile, so option C is right.

Question 2

In the following question, select the related letters from the given alternatives by applying the same mirror coding rule: DJLQ : WQOJ :: DMSW : ?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This letter analogy problem comes from the alphabet coding section of reasoning. We are given the pair DJLQ : WQOJ and must find which option correctly represents the coded form of DMSW using the same transformation. Solving this requires a good grasp of letter positions and mirror relationships within the English alphabet. Given Data / Assumptions: The alphabet is treated as a sequence from A = 1 to Z = 26. DJLQ is transformed into WQOJ in the given pair. The same coding rule must be applied to DMSW. The options provide four possible four letter codes, only one of which follows the same pattern. Concept / Approach:First we test common operations like shifting letters forward or backward by a fixed number of positions. When this fails, we consider mirror coding, where each letter is replaced by its opposite in the alphabet: A pairs with Z, B with Y, C with X, and so on. If we see that each letter of DJLQ is replaced by its mirror to get WQOJ, we then apply the same mirror operation to DMSW and match the result to the options. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Determine the positions of the letters in DJLQ: D = 4, J = 10, L = 12, Q = 17.Step 2: For mirror coding, compute mirror position = 27 – original position, so that A (1) pairs with Z (26), B (2) with Y (25), and so on.Step 3: Find the mirrors: D (4) mirrors to 27 – 4 = 23, which is W; J (10) mirrors to 17, which is Q; L (12) mirrors to 15, which is O; Q (17) mirrors to 10, which is J.Step 4: The mirror string of DJLQ is WQOJ, which exactly matches the given coded form. So the rule is confirmed as simple mirror coding.Step 5: Now apply the same process to DMSW. Positions are D = 4, M = 13, S = 19, W = 23.Step 6: Compute mirrors: D (4) mirrors to 23, which is W; M (13) mirrors to 14, which is N; S (19) mirrors to 8, which is H; W (23) mirrors to 4, which is D.Step 7: This gives the string WNHD, which matches option A. Verification / Alternative check:To verify, we can check whether any other option could plausibly come from a simple uniform shift or a different consistent rule. None of the other options match the mirror positions or uniform shifts applied to DMSW. Since the mirror mapping works perfectly for the first pair and leads precisely to WNHD for the second word, our answer is reliable. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Option B, WNDH, is a rearrangement of the correct letters but not in the proper mirror order, which shows that it does not truly follow the coding rule. Option C, WHND, also mixes correct and incorrect positions. Option D, WWCC, does not relate to the mirror positions of D, M, S and W at all. Thus these options fail to reflect the discovered transformation. Common Pitfalls:Some candidates stop after finding a partial similarity and choose an option that contains some matching letters without verifying each position. Others only test forward or backward shifts and overlook the mirror concept entirely. Always confirm that your rule explains every letter transformation in the example pair before using it to decode the second word. Final Answer:The correct coded form of DMSW under the same mirror rule is WNHD, so option A is correct.

Question 3

In this prime number classification question, you must select the odd number from the set: 71, 83, 89 and 93.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This is an odd one out question based on prime and composite numbers. You are given four numbers and must identify which one does not belong to the same category as the others. Questions like this test your understanding of prime numbers and your ability to quickly check divisibility. Given Data / Assumptions: The numbers in the options are 71, 83, 89 and 93. We suspect that three numbers might be prime, while one number is composite. Prime numbers are natural numbers greater than 1 that have exactly two distinct positive divisors: 1 and the number itself. Composite numbers have additional divisors other than 1 and themselves. Concept / Approach:To identify the odd number, we systematically test each option for primality by checking divisibility by small prime numbers like 2, 3, 5, 7 and 11. If a number is not divisible by any of these primes up to its approximate square root, it is prime. The number that turns out to be composite, while the others are prime, will be the odd one out. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Check 71. It is odd and not divisible by 2. Sum of digits is 7 + 1 = 8, so it is not divisible by 3. It does not end in 0 or 5, so it is not divisible by 5. Dividing by 7 and 11 also does not yield an integer. Therefore, 71 is prime.Step 2: Check 83. It is odd and not divisible by 2. Sum of digits is 8 + 3 = 11, so not divisible by 3. It does not end in 5 or 0, so not divisible by 5. Basic checks with 7 and 11 show no exact division, so 83 is prime.Step 3: Check 89. It is odd and not divisible by 2. Sum of digits is 8 + 9 = 17, not a multiple of 3. It does not end in 5 or 0. Checks with 7 and 11 also fail to produce an integer quotient. Hence 89 is prime.Step 4: Check 93. It is odd but we must test divisibility by small primes. Sum of digits is 9 + 3 = 12, which is a multiple of 3. Therefore, 93 is divisible by 3, specifically 93 = 3 * 31, so it is composite.Step 5: Since 93 is composite and 71, 83, and 89 are prime, 93 is different from the others. Verification / Alternative check:We can quickly verify the result by noting that primes near 100 are often memorised, and 71, 83 and 89 are commonly known primes. Meanwhile, the clear divisibility of 93 by 3 confirms that it is not prime. This reinforces the conclusion that 93 is the only composite number in the list. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Option A, 71, is a prime number and therefore belongs to the same category as 83 and 89. Option B, 83, is also prime. Option C, 89, is another prime. The question asks for the number that is different from the others, so none of these can be the correct answer. Common Pitfalls:Some candidates may avoid checking divisibility carefully and guess based on the size or look of the number. Another mistake is to confuse near by composite numbers with primes. Practising basic divisibility tests for numbers up to 100 can greatly reduce such errors in the exam. Final Answer:The only composite number in the list is 93, so option D is correct.

Question 4

In this analogy based on water bodies, River is related to Stream as Ocean is related to which of the following: River : Stream :: Ocean : ?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This question tests your understanding of the relationship between natural water bodies. The pair River : Stream shows a relationship between a larger body of flowing water and a smaller or similar type of watercourse. You must find the option that plays a similar role or shows a similar relationship with Ocean. Recognising such hierarchical or size based relationships is common in verbal reasoning. Given Data / Assumptions: A river is a large natural stream of water flowing in a channel. A stream is a smaller or narrower body of flowing water similar in nature to a river. An ocean is a vast body of salt water that covers a major part of the Earth. The options include Current, Pond, Dam and Sea, which are all related in some way to water. Concept / Approach:The relation River : Stream can be described as "larger watercourse : smaller similar watercourse." We must identify the term that stands to Ocean in the same way that Stream stands to River. Among the options, Sea is a large body of salt water that is typically smaller than an ocean but of the same general type. Therefore, Sea is to Ocean as Stream is to River. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Understand that a river is a substantial flowing body of water, while a stream is like a smaller version of a river.Step 2: Express the pattern as "larger water body of a kind : smaller similar water body."Step 3: Consider an ocean as an extremely large body of salt water that covers huge areas of the globe.Step 4: Look for a smaller but similar body of water among the options. Sea is a large body of salt water, but smaller than an ocean and often partly enclosed by land, so it fits this pattern well.Step 5: Evaluate other options. Current is a movement of water within a larger water body, not a separate body. Pond is usually a small still body of freshwater, which differs from ocean in type and scale. Dam is a human made structure that blocks water flow.Step 6: Conclude that Ocean : Sea mirrors River : Stream in a natural and meaningful way. Verification / Alternative check:We can test the analogy by converting it into words: "A stream is a smaller version of a river, just as a sea is a smaller version of an ocean." This statement is accurate in general geographic terms. None of the other options give a similarly clear and parallel description, which confirms that Sea is the correct choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Option A, Current, is only a flow within a water body and not itself a classification of water body. Option B, Pond, is small and fresh water, which does not correspond well with a huge salt water ocean. Option C, Dam, is a structure, not a natural body of water at all. They therefore fail to represent a smaller similar water body in relation to an ocean. Common Pitfalls:Some candidates may rush and choose Pond because it is a smaller water body, ignoring differences in type and context. Others might confuse terms like current and sea due to loose everyday usage. Always focus on what kind of entity each word represents and whether it truly mirrors the relationship in the example pair. Final Answer:The correct completion of the analogy is Sea, so option D is correct.

Question 5

In this alphabet analogy, WUS is related to DFH by a mirror coding pattern; using the same pattern, find the corresponding letters for MKI: WUS : DFH :: MKI : ?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This question tests your ability to decode alphabet analogies that use mirror coding. We are given the pair WUS : DFH and must identify the correct mapping for MKI under the same transformation. These problems build familiarity with the idea that letters can be paired symmetrically across the alphabet, with A mirrored by Z, B by Y, and so on. Given Data / Assumptions: The English alphabet runs from A = 1 to Z = 26. WUS is transformed into DFH in the given pair. The same rule must be applied to MKI. The options provide four possible three letter strings, only one of which matches the rule. Concept / Approach:First we test whether WUS has been transformed by a simple shift in positions. If this fails, we check for mirror coding, where each letter is replaced by its opposite in the alphabet using the formula mirror position = 27 – original position. If W maps neatly to D, U to F and S to H with this rule, we accept mirror coding as the correct transformation and then apply it to MKI. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Determine the positions of W, U and S: W = 23, U = 21, S = 19.Step 2: Compute mirror position = 27 – original. For W (23), mirror = 27 – 23 = 4, which is D. For U (21), mirror = 27 – 21 = 6, which is F. For S (19), mirror = 27 – 19 = 8, which is H.Step 3: The resulting string DFH matches the given coded form, so the rule is confirmed as mirror coding.Step 4: Now find the positions of M, K and I: M = 13, K = 11, I = 9.Step 5: Apply the same mirror formula. For M (13), mirror = 27 – 13 = 14, which is N. For K (11), mirror = 27 – 11 = 16, which is P. For I (9), mirror = 27 – 9 = 18, which is R.Step 6: Combine these letters to obtain NPR.Step 7: Compare with the options. NPR appears as option D, so that must be the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check:To double check, we can verify at a glance that none of the other options correspond to mirror positions of M, K and I. For example, GEC, OQS or LJH do not match the N, P and R obtained by formula. Since mirror coding explains the given example cleanly and leads unambiguously to NPR, our choice is well justified. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Option A, LJH, uses letters close to M, K and I in the alphabet but does not follow the mirror formula. Option B, GEC, would require a completely different rule. Option C, OQS, also fails to match the mirror positions and appears unrelated. Thus, these alternatives do not reflect the same transformation used in WUS : DFH. Common Pitfalls:One common error is guessing an option that visually looks similar or uses neighbouring letters instead of deriving the exact rule. Another pitfall is applying a uniform shift without checking whether it reproduces DFH from WUS in the first place. Always confirm the transformation thoroughly on the example pair before relying on it to decode the second word. Final Answer:Using the same mirror coding rule, MKI is correctly transformed to NPR, so option D is the right answer.

Question 6

In this fraction analogy, -3/7 is related to 7/3 by a clear numeric rule; using the same rule, determine the fraction related to 9/2: -3/7 : 7/3 :: 9/2 : ?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This question is a fraction analogy that tests your understanding of reciprocals and sign changes. The given pair -3/7 : 7/3 shows how one fraction is transformed into another. You are required to apply exactly the same transformation to 9/2 and select the correct resulting fraction from the options. Such questions reinforce concepts like reciprocal, absolute value and negative sign handling in arithmetic. Given Data / Assumptions: The first fraction in the example pair is -3/7. The second fraction in the example pair is 7/3. The first fraction in the target pair is 9/2, a positive fraction. We assume basic familiarity with how reciprocals of fractions are computed. Concept / Approach:We start by examining how -3/7 becomes 7/3. The reciprocal of a fraction a/b is b/a. The reciprocal of -3/7 is -7/3, but the given result is 7/3, which is the positive reciprocal. Therefore, the transformation appears to be "take the reciprocal and drop the negative sign, that is, use the absolute value of the reciprocal." Once we confirm this rule, we apply it step by step to 9/2. Step-by-Step Solution:Step 1: Write the given fraction -3/7.Step 2: Compute its reciprocal. Reciprocal of -3/7 is -7/3.Step 3: Compare this with the given image fraction 7/3. The difference is that the sign has been made positive.Step 4: Conclude that the transformation from -3/7 to 7/3 is "take the reciprocal and then take the absolute value," meaning we remove the negative sign.Step 5: Apply the same rule to 9/2. First, compute the reciprocal: reciprocal of 9/2 is 2/9.Step 6: Since 9/2 is already positive, the reciprocal 2/9 is also positive, and taking absolute value does not change it.Step 7: Therefore, the fraction corresponding to 9/2 under this rule is 2/9. Verification / Alternative check:We can verify by checking each option against the discovered rule. The reciprocal of 9/2 is 2/9. Any answer that is not 2/9 or that introduces an unnecessary negative sign would break the pattern. Option A is 2/9 and matches the positive reciprocal exactly. Options B and D both involve negative signs, which are inconsistent with the loss of negativity in the first pair, while option C, 7/2, is unrelated to reciprocals of 9/2. This confirms 2/9 as the correct answer. Why Other Options Are Wrong:Option B, -9/2, simply reproduces the original fraction with a negative sign and does not involve any reciprocal. Option C, 7/2, neither matches the reciprocal nor reflects any simple relation to 9/2. Option D, -2/9, is the negative reciprocal, but the example pair shows that the mapping removes the negative sign in the result. Therefore, these three options do not obey the same transformation used between -3/7 and 7/3. Common Pitfalls:A common mistake is to think the rule is "just take the reciprocal" and then incorrectly choose -2/9 because of confusion about the sign. Another pitfall is to focus only on the numeric values and ignore the sign change between -3/7 and 7/3. To avoid this, always check both the magnitude and the sign of the numbers when you deduce the transformation from the first pair. Final Answer:Applying the same rule to 9/2 gives the positive reciprocal 2/9, so option A is correct.

Question 7

In the analogy "Car : steering wheel :: motorcycle : ____", which part controls the direction of a motorcycle?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This verbal analogy tests your understanding of the relationship between a vehicle and the main part used to steer and control its direction. In the pair "Car : steering wheel", the second word names the key control device that the driver uses to turn and guide the car. You must extend the same type of relationship to a motorcycle and select the part that plays an equivalent role for a rider. Given Data / Assumptions: A car is steered by using a steering wheel. A motorcycle is steered by using a specific front control assembly. Other motorcycle parts like engine, tyre, seat and headlight are important but not used primarily for steering. The question follows a simple pattern: vehicle : main steering control. Concept / Approach: For a car, the steering wheel is the circular control that the driver rotates to change direction. For a motorcycle, the rider turns the front assembly using the handle bar. The handle bar is the horizontal bar fixed to the front fork that the rider grips with both hands. By pushing or pulling on the handle bar, the rider turns the front wheel to the left or right, which steers the motorcycle. Therefore, handle bar is to motorcycle as steering wheel is to car. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the pattern in the first pair: car is related to its steering wheel. Recognise that the relationship is "vehicle : primary steering control". List key motorcycle parts: engine, tyres, seat, headlight and handle bar. Note that only the handle bar is directly gripped and turned by the rider to steer the motorcycle. Conclude that handle bar fits the same functional role as steering wheel in the given analogy. Verification / Alternative check: The engine provides power but it does not steer the motorcycle. Tyres make contact with the road but are not directly used for steering by the rider. The seat supports the rider and the headlight provides illumination. None of these parts match the specific steering function. Only the handle bar is used to control direction, so it correctly parallels the steering wheel of a car. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Tyre, engine, seat and headlight are all important vehicle parts, but they do not serve as the main steering control. Selecting any of them would change the type of relationship and break the pattern that the first pair establishes. The analogy demands a direct functional match, which only the handle bar provides. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to pick any motorcycle part that feels important, such as the engine, without checking whether it mirrors the car steering wheel in function. Another pitfall is to overthink the question and imagine rare or modified vehicle designs. In standard reasoning questions, focus on everyday usage and the most common control parts. Final Answer: The correct completion of the analogy is "Car : steering wheel :: motorcycle : handle bar".

Question 8

In the letter analogy "EFG : VUT :: JIH : ____", which group of letters completes the pattern using alphabet complements?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This analogy tests your understanding of alphabet complements and pattern recognition in letter series. The pair "EFG : VUT" suggests that each letter of EFG is converted into another letter according to a specific rule. You must identify that rule and apply it to JIH to find the correct related group of letters. Such questions are common in reasoning sections and require comfort with the positions of letters in the English alphabet. Given Data / Assumptions: The first pair is EFG mapped to VUT. The second group JIH must be mapped using the same rule. Alphabet positions are A = 1, B = 2, ..., Z = 26. We expect a clean and consistent pattern like complement or fixed shifts. Concept / Approach: A well known pattern uses alphabet complements, where letters are paired so that their positions add up to 27. For example, A pairs with Z (1 + 26 = 27), B with Y, C with X and so on. E is the 5th letter and V is the 22nd, so 5 + 22 = 27. F is 6 and U is 21, giving 6 + 21 = 27. G is 7 and T is 20, giving 7 + 20 = 27. Therefore, each letter in EFG is replaced by its complement to 27, and the resulting letters are written in reverse order to form VUT. Step-by-Step Solution: Write the positions of E, F and G as 5, 6 and 7. Find their complements: 27 minus 5 = 22 (V), 27 minus 6 = 21 (U), 27 minus 7 = 20 (T). Observe that these letters appear together as VUT in the first pair. Now consider JIH. The positions of J, I and H are 10, 9 and 8. Find their complements: 27 minus 10 = 17 (Q), 27 minus 9 = 18 (R), 27 minus 8 = 19 (S). Arrange these complement letters as QRS to match the pattern. Verification / Alternative check: Check each option. SUW does not match the complement values for J, I and H. QSU and HFD also break the complement rule and do not maintain the increasing sequence that appears in QRS. Only QRS uses letters whose positions sum with 10, 9 and 8 to give 27 each time. Therefore it is the only option that exactly follows the pattern observed in the first pair. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Any option whose letters do not represent the complements of J, I and H must be rejected. SUW, QSU, HFD and TVX may contain valid letters, but the sums of positions will not be 27 when combined with 10, 9 and 8. Since the analogy relies on the strict complement to 27 rule, those options cannot correctly complete the pattern. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to look only for forward or backward shifts by a fixed number of positions and ignore the possibility of complement patterns. Another pitfall is to miscalculate letter positions and therefore misjudge which sums reach 27. Writing the alphabet with positions and doing the arithmetic carefully helps avoid these errors. Final Answer: The correct completion of the analogy is "EFG : VUT :: JIH : QRS".

Question 9

In the shape analogy "Spring : spiral :: bangle : ____", which option best describes the geometric shape of a bangle?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This analogy checks whether you can recognise the relationship between an object and its characteristic shape. In the pair "Spring : spiral", the second word describes the typical geometric form of a spring. You must find a similar description for a bangle. These kinds of questions appear regularly in reasoning tests to check conceptual understanding of everyday objects and basic geometry. Given Data / Assumptions: A spring is commonly coiled in a spiral shape. A bangle is a circular ornament worn around the wrist. Options include material related words and general categories as distractors. The pattern is "object : its typical shape". Concept / Approach: In the first pair, spring is not being described by material or by use; it is described by its physical form, which is spiral. Therefore, for the second pair we should also describe the physical form of a bangle. A standard bangle is round, forming a loop that can slide over the hand and rest on the wrist. This shape is best described as a circle. The other options like glass, ornament and gold refer to material or category, not to shape, so they do not parallel the relationship in the first pair. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify that spiral describes the geometric form of a spring. Recognise the pattern "object : its usual shape". Recall that a bangle is usually a closed loop worn around the wrist. Note that this loop is circular when viewed from the front, which matches the term circle. Confirm that circle is the only option that names a shape rather than a material or broad category. Verification / Alternative check: Glass and gold describe possible materials from which a bangle can be made, but they do not express its shape. Ornament is a general term for decorative items and also does not identify geometry. Spiral is already used to describe the shape of a spring and does not fit a typical bangle, which is not coiled. Hence none of these match the precise relationship between spring and spiral. Only circle expresses the same geometric kind of information that spiral does in the first pair. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Choosing glass, gold or ornament changes the relationship from shape based to material or category based. That would no longer mirror the relationship between spring and spiral. Analogy questions demand that the type of relationship remain consistent across both pairs, so these options are incorrect. Common Pitfalls: A frequent mistake is to focus on what a bangle is made of or how it is used, instead of how it looks geometrically. Another pitfall is to be attracted to the word ornament, because a bangle is indeed an ornament, but that does not match the shape focus of the first pair. Always check whether you are comparing the same property in both parts of an analogy. Final Answer: The pair that mirrors "Spring : spiral" is "Bangle : circle".

Question 10

In the letter analogy "WUV : TRS :: QOP : ____", which option follows the same backward alphabet pattern?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This letter analogy involves a fixed backward shift in the alphabet. In the pair "WUV : TRS", each letter of the first group is changed to another letter in a consistent way. You must detect that pattern and apply it to the second group "QOP" to find the correct related letters from the options. This type of problem checks your ability to convert between letters and their alphabet positions and spot regular shifts. Given Data / Assumptions: First pair of groups: WUV and TRS. Second group: QOP, which must be transformed similarly. Alphabet positions: A = 1, B = 2, ..., Z = 26. We assume a simple constant shift like plus or minus a fixed number. Concept / Approach: Convert each letter of WUV and TRS into its numerical position. W is 23, U is 21 and V is 22. T is 20, R is 18 and S is 19. From W to T, the shift is minus 3 (23 minus 3 = 20). From U to R, the shift is minus 3 (21 minus 3 = 18). From V to S, again minus 3 (22 minus 3 = 19). Thus the rule is clear: each letter in the first group is moved three places backward in the alphabet to obtain the corresponding letter in the second group. Apply this same shift to QOP. Step-by-Step Solution: Write the positions of Q, O and P: Q = 17, O = 15, P = 16. Apply the backward shift of 3 to Q: 17 minus 3 = 14, which corresponds to N. Apply the backward shift of 3 to O: 15 minus 3 = 12, which corresponds to L. Apply the backward shift of 3 to P: 16 minus 3 = 13, which corresponds to M. Combine the letters N, L and M to obtain NLM as the related group. Verification / Alternative check: Check each option. XYZ, CBA and ABZ are not three letters behind QOP and do not match the calculated letters NLM. Option NOP simply repeats two letters from the original group and therefore fails to apply any transformation. Only NLM matches the precise three step backward shift for each letter. This confirms that NLM is the only correct completion of the analogy. Why Other Options Are Wrong: XYZ and CBA are arranged either at the end or at the start of the alphabet, but they are not obtained from QOP by the discovered transformation. ABZ mixes early and late letters in a way not justified by the pattern. NOP keeps the original last two letters and does not shift them, which means it does not maintain the relationship that exists between WUV and TRS. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates try to match rough visual patterns, such as increasing or decreasing alphabetical order, without checking exact positions. Others consider shifting by two or four positions and become confused when the numbers do not line up. The safest method is to write the positions of letters, do the arithmetic and then retranslate those positions back into letters. Final Answer: The analogy is completed by "WUV : TRS :: QOP : NLM".

Question 11

In the number analogy "7.25 : 7.75 :: 9 : ____", which value completes the pattern with the same increase?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This numerical analogy deals with decimal numbers and a constant difference between the first and second element of each pair. The relationship "7.25 : 7.75" shows that some fixed amount has been added to 7.25 to obtain 7.75. You must identify this increment and apply it to 9 in order to choose the correct missing value from the options. Such questions help test basic arithmetic skills, especially with decimal fractions. Given Data / Assumptions: First pair: 7.25 is related to 7.75. Second pair: 9 is related to an unknown value. Options: 9.5, 7, 10, 8.5, 8.25. We assume a simple addition pattern rather than complex operations. Concept / Approach: First check the difference between 7.25 and 7.75. Subtract the smaller from the larger. The difference is 7.75 minus 7.25, which equals 0.50. Therefore, the rule in the first pair is: add 0.50 to the first number to obtain the second number. To maintain the analogy, we must add the same amount, 0.50, to 9. This yields 9.50, which can be written as 9.5. That value must be selected from the options. Step-by-Step Solution: Compute the difference in the first pair: 7.75 - 7.25 = 0.50. Recognise that the rule is "add 0.50" or "add half a unit". Apply the rule to the number 9: 9 + 0.50 = 9.50. Rewrite 9.50 in standard decimal form as 9.5. Locate 9.5 in the options and select it as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Check alternative options briefly. If you add 1 instead of 0.5, you would get 10, which does not match the pattern of the first pair. Adding 0.25 would give 9.25, which is not listed. Subtracting 0.5 would give 8.5, which also does not correspond to the increase seen in the original numbers. The only consistent rule is addition of 0.5, and this leads uniquely to 9.5. Why Other Options Are Wrong: The values 7, 10, 8.5 and 8.25 do not result from adding 0.5 to 9. Choosing any of them would mean applying a different increment than the one used between 7.25 and 7.75. Since analogies require the same operation to be used in both pairs, these options are incorrect. Common Pitfalls: One common error is to try to match whole numbers only and ignore the decimal fraction, which may lead candidates to choose 10 or 8. However, careful subtraction of the decimal values reveals the true pattern. Another pitfall is confusion between adding and subtracting, which can be avoided by explicitly performing the calculation rather than guessing. Final Answer: Using the rule "add 0.5", 7.25 maps to 7.75 and 9 maps to 9.5. So the completed analogy is "7.25 : 7.75 :: 9 : 9.5".

Question 12

From the following three letter groups, which one is the odd one out based on the alphabetical order pattern?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question asks you to identify the odd one out from groups of three letters. The pattern is based on the relative positions of letters in the English alphabet. Three of the options follow one consistent positional rule, while one option follows a different rule. The task is to analyse each group and determine which arrangement does not fit the common pattern. Given Data / Assumptions: Letter groups: RQS, XWV, MLN, FEG and TSU. We consider alphabetical positions: A = 1, B = 2, ..., Z = 26. We compare the differences between consecutive letters within each group. Exactly one group will stand out by following a different pattern. Concept / Approach: Look at the first, second and third letters in each group and convert them to numerical positions. For RQS, the letters are R (18), Q (17) and S (19). The changes are minus 1 from R to Q and plus 2 from Q to S. For MLN, M (13), L (12) and N (14) again give minus 1 then plus 2. For FEG, F (6), E (5) and G (7) also follow minus 1 then plus 2. Thus these three groups share the same pattern: first to second letter is backward by one step, second to third letter is forward by two steps. Now examine XWV carefully to see if it fits or breaks this rule. Step-by-Step Solution: For RQS: R = 18, Q = 17, S = 19. Differences are -1 and +2. For MLN: M = 13, L = 12, N = 14. Differences are -1 and +2. For FEG: F = 6, E = 5, G = 7. Differences are -1 and +2. For XWV: X = 24, W = 23, V = 22. Differences are -1 and -1. Observe that XWV descends continuously, whereas the others move down then up. Verification / Alternative check: TSU would be T (20), S (19), U (21), which again is minus 1 then plus 2, so TSU matches the main pattern. The only group that does not follow minus 1 then plus 2 is XWV, which moves minus 1 and minus 1 again. Therefore, XWV forms a pure descending sequence instead of the mixed pattern and is the odd one out. Why Other Options Are Wrong: RQS, MLN, FEG and TSU all share the exact same positional change pattern, combining a backward step followed by a forward step. They are consistent with each other and therefore cannot be considered odd. The question requires the one option that breaks this shared rule, which is XWV. Common Pitfalls: A frequent error is to judge letter groups by rough visual order, such as assuming any group that looks nonstandard must be wrong. Another mistake is to look only at whether the sequence overall increases or decreases without checking the step size between each pair of letters. Writing down positions and differences systematically is the most reliable method. Final Answer: The only group that does not follow the minus 1 then plus 2 pattern is XWV, so it is the odd one out.

Question 13

From the following numbers, which one is the odd one out based on divisibility by 25?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This odd one out question is based on divisibility properties of numbers. Four of the given numbers share a common factor, while one number does not. You are required to identify that special number. Recognising divisibility by 25 is particularly useful in such problems, because it is linked to numbers ending in 00, 25, 50 or 75. Given Data / Assumptions: Numbers given: 700, 250, 350, 640 and 900. You need to find which number does not share a key divisibility property with the others. We recall that a number is divisible by 25 if its last two digits form 00, 25, 50 or 75. We aim for a clean and simple numerical property that explains the pattern. Concept / Approach: Look at the last two digits of each number. For 700, the last two digits are 00, so 700 is divisible by 25. For 250, the last two digits are 50, which again indicates divisibility by 25. For 350, the last two digits are also 50, so it is again a multiple of 25. For 900, the last two digits are 00, so it is divisible by 25 as well. Now check 640: the last two digits are 40, which do not match 00, 25, 50 or 75. Therefore, 640 is not divisible by 25. This makes it different from the others and hence the odd one out. Step-by-Step Solution: Write the last two digits of 700, 250, 350, 640 and 900. 700 ends with 00, so 700 / 25 is an integer. 250 ends with 50, so 250 / 25 is 10, an integer. 350 also ends with 50, so 350 / 25 is 14, an integer. 900 ends with 00, so 900 / 25 is 36, an integer. 640 ends with 40, which is not 00, 25, 50 or 75, so 640 is not divisible by 25. Verification / Alternative check: If you actually divide, 700 / 25 = 28, 250 / 25 = 10, 350 / 25 = 14 and 900 / 25 = 36, all neat whole numbers. However, 640 / 25 equals 25.6, which is not an integer. This confirms that only 640 fails the test of divisibility by 25. No other simple property like parity or divisibility by 10 distinguishes only one number as clearly as this property does. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 700, 250, 350 and 900 all share the common feature of being multiples of 25. Because we are looking for the number that does not share the group property, these cannot be the odd one out. Only 640 lacks this shared factor and hence fits the requirement. Common Pitfalls: A common mistake is to focus on even and odd status or to pick the smallest or largest number without checking divisibility patterns. Many reasoning questions use factors like 5, 10 or 25 as the hidden link, so checking these quickly can save time and prevent confusion. Final Answer: The only number not divisible by 25 is 640, so it is the odd one out.

Question 14

In the number analogy "14 : 16 :: 22 : ____", which number completes the same +2 pattern?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This analogy tests your ability to identify a simple arithmetic relationship between two numbers and then apply that same relationship to a new number. In "14 : 16", the second number is clearly related to the first by a small addition. You must recognise that pattern and use it to determine the correct partner for 22 from the given options. Given Data / Assumptions: First pair: 14 is related to 16. Second pair: 22 is related to an unknown number. Options: 26, 29, 24, 28 and 23. We expect a straightforward rule such as adding a fixed number. Concept / Approach: Find the difference between the numbers in the first pair. Subtract 14 from 16 to see how much has been added. The result is 2, so the rule is "add 2 to the first number to obtain the second number". To preserve the analogy, the same addition must be applied to 22. Therefore, you add 2 to 22, which gives 24. That value should then be chosen from the options as the correct answer. Step-by-Step Solution: Compute the difference: 16 - 14 = 2. Recognise the pattern: second number = first number + 2. Apply this rule to the new number: 22 + 2 = 24. Check whether 24 is present among the answer options. Select 24 as the number that maintains the same relationship. Verification / Alternative check: Test other options briefly. If we chose 26, that would imply adding 4 to 22. However, 14 plus 4 is 18, not 16, so the pattern would change. Similarly, choosing 28 or 29 would involve adding 6 or 7, which again does not match the first pair. Option 23 corresponds to adding 1, which also does not agree with the original +2 pattern. Thus, 24 is the only number that satisfies the consistent rule for both pairs. Why Other Options Are Wrong: All other options require different increments from 22, which would break the single fixed rule required in an analogy. The question is designed to be solved with a simple addition pattern, so introducing larger or smaller increments makes the pairs inconsistent. Therefore, only 24 keeps the logic of the first pair intact. Common Pitfalls: Some candidates may overthink such questions and look for complex operations like squaring, halving or adding multiple steps. However, in many basic analogies the relationship is a simple addition or subtraction. Always check for small changes first before trying complicated patterns. Final Answer: Using the rule "add 2 to the first number", 14 maps to 16 and 22 maps to 24. So the analogy is "14 : 16 :: 22 : 24".

Question 15

In the letter analogy "ART : BSU :: MRV : ____", which option continues the same forward shift pattern?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This analogy uses a fixed forward shift in the alphabet to convert one group of letters into another. In the pair "ART : BSU", each letter of ART is shifted to produce BSU. You must discover the amount of shift and then apply the same transformation to MRV in order to select the correct answer. Such letter based analogies help evaluate pattern recognition and attention to detail. Given Data / Assumptions: First pair: ART becomes BSU. Second group: MRV must be transformed similarly. Alphabet positions: A = 1, B = 2, ..., Z = 26. The same shift value is used for each letter of the word. Concept / Approach: Convert each letter of ART into its numerical position. A is 1, R is 18 and T is 20. For BSU, B is 2, S is 19 and U is 21. Find the difference between each pair: 1 to 2 is plus 1, 18 to 19 is plus 1, and 20 to 21 is plus 1. Therefore, the rule is that each letter is advanced by one position in the alphabet. To get the answer, we apply this same plus 1 shift to each letter of MRV. Step-by-Step Solution: Write numerical positions for M, R and V: M = 13, R = 18, V = 22. Add 1 to the position of M: 13 + 1 = 14, which is N. Add 1 to the position of R: 18 + 1 = 19, which is S. Add 1 to the position of V: 22 + 1 = 23, which is W. Combine N, S and W to form NSW as the transformed group. Verification / Alternative check: Verify the options. KFT, MFG, NRV and MTW do not represent a uniform plus 1 shift from M, R and V. For instance, NRV repeats the last two original letters and changes only the first, so it fails the consistent rule test. NSW alone results from adding exactly 1 to the position of each letter, just as in the ART to BSU mapping. Therefore it is the only correct choice. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Any option that does not apply a plus 1 shift to each letter violates the discovered pattern. Some options change letters by larger steps or in an uneven manner, and some partially reuse original letters. Since an analogy must reflect the same rule in both pairs, these alternatives cannot be accepted. Common Pitfalls: Many test takers try to guess based on partial similarity or pronounceable combinations instead of checking each letter mathematically. Others may detect that A becomes B but then fail to confirm that the same shift applies to R and T. Systematically converting letters to numbers and verifying each position change prevents these errors. Final Answer: The correct completion of the analogy is "ART : BSU :: MRV : NSW".

Question 16

In the tool analogy "Farmer : plough :: painter : ____", which tool is used primarily by a painter?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This analogy connects professionals with their primary tools. In the pair "Farmer : plough", the second word names the main tool that a farmer traditionally uses to prepare the soil for cultivation. You must apply the same type of relationship to a painter and identify the tool that best represents that profession in the same way. These analogy questions test your awareness of common occupations and their typical instruments. Given Data / Assumptions: A farmer commonly uses a plough to turn and prepare the soil. A painter works with colours on surfaces such as canvas, walls or paper. We want the main tool associated with painting, not an occasional accessory. The pattern is "profession : primary working tool". Concept / Approach: The plough is not the only tool that a farmer may use, but it symbolises farming activity strongly. In the same way, while a painter may use palettes, easels and other items, the brush is the central tool used to apply paint onto the surface. Harrow and spade are agricultural tools more closely linked with farming. A hammer and a knife are general tools used in other trades. Therefore, brush is the closest and most natural parallel to plough in the context of painting. Step-by-Step Solution: Recognise the pattern: a farmer uses a plough as a core tool for field work. Identify that a painter needs a tool to apply paint onto surfaces. List the given options and group them by domain: brush for painting, harrow and spade for farming, hammer and knife for general physical tasks. Observe that brush is uniquely and directly associated with painting. Select brush as the only tool that plays the same symbolic role for a painter that plough plays for a farmer. Verification / Alternative check: Harrow is a farm implement used to break up clods and smooth the soil, so pairing it with a painter would not fit. Spade is used for digging, again an agricultural or construction tool. Hammer and knife are used in carpentry, metal work or cutting, but they are not standard painting tools. Only brush is strongly and specifically tied to the occupation of a painter in everyday language and exam contexts. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Choosing harrow or spade would accidentally repeat the farming context instead of creating a new profession tool pair. Hammer and knife are too general and do not capture the artistic activity of painting. The analogy must pair each profession with its most iconic tool, and only brush satisfies that requirement. Common Pitfalls: Sometimes candidates get distracted by tools they have seen painters use occasionally, such as knives for special techniques. However, exam analogies usually rely on the simplest and most common association. Remember to think of the primary image that comes to mind for a profession, not rare or specialised equipment. Final Answer: The correct completion is "Farmer : plough :: Painter : brush".

Question 17

In the letter analogy "AEG : GKM :: MQS : ____", which group of letters completes the same +6 shift pattern?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This analogy involves a fixed forward shift in the alphabet for each letter in a group. The pair "AEG : GKM" shows how each letter in AEG is transformed into the corresponding letter in GKM. You must discover the shift pattern and then apply it to the second group, MQS, to choose the correct related letters. This is a classic letter coding problem often seen in reasoning exams. Given Data / Assumptions: First pair: AEG is mapped to GKM. Second group: MQS must be mapped using the same rule. Alphabet positions: A = 1, B = 2, ..., Z = 26. The same shift is applied to each letter within a group. Concept / Approach: Convert letters to their positions. For AEG, positions are A = 1, E = 5 and G = 7. For GKM, positions are G = 7, K = 11 and M = 13. Calculate differences: from 1 to 7 is plus 6, from 5 to 11 is plus 6, from 7 to 13 is plus 6. The rule is therefore clear: every letter in the first group is shifted six places forward. To maintain the analogy, we apply this plus 6 shift to each letter of MQS. Step-by-Step Solution: Write letter positions for M, Q and S: M = 13, Q = 17, S = 19. Add 6 to M: 13 + 6 = 19, which corresponds to S. Add 6 to Q: 17 + 6 = 23, which corresponds to W. Add 6 to S: 19 + 6 = 25, which corresponds to Y. Combine S, W and Y to form SWY as the related group of letters. Verification / Alternative check: Examine each option. SWZ changes the last letter to Z, which would require S to move from 19 to 26, a shift of 7 rather than 6. ZWQ and SWB involve larger or inconsistent shifts that do not match the plus 6 rule. SVY uses 19 to 22 for the second letter, which is a plus 3 shift, not plus 6. Only SWY maintains a uniform shift of six positions from the original letters M, Q and S. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Any option that does not result from adding exactly six to each original letter position breaks the discovered pattern. Since an analogy must reflect the same transformation in both examples, mixed or unequal shifts cannot be accepted. The incorrect options are carefully designed distractors that look similar but do not preserve the precise arithmetic relationship. Common Pitfalls: Common mistakes include counting the letters inaccurately, forgetting to use the same shift for all letters, or being tempted by groups that look similar but do not fully satisfy the pattern. Writing the positions explicitly and checking each step helps avoid these errors and leads to the correct answer quickly. Final Answer: The analogy is completed as "AEG : GKM :: MQS : SWY".

Question 18

In the number analogy "17 : 71 :: 35 : ____", which number is related to 35 in the same reversed digit pattern?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This analogy revolves around reversing the digits of two digit numbers. In the pair "17 : 71", the second number is obtained by writing the digits of the first number in reverse order. You must apply the same idea to 35 and choose the correct number from the options that reflects this reverse digit relationship. Digit reversal is a common pattern in reasoning questions. Given Data / Assumptions: First pair: 17 is related to 71. Second pair: 35 is related to an unknown number. Options: 69, 56, 60, 53 and 44. We assume a direct reverse digit relationship rather than arithmetic operations. Concept / Approach: In 17, the tens digit is 1 and the units digit is 7. In 71, the tens digit is 7 and the units digit is 1. This shows that the digits have simply swapped positions. No addition or subtraction is involved; it is a positional change. To mirror this pattern, we must reverse the digits of 35 by swapping 3 and 5, which will give 53. That number must be chosen as the correct answer. Step-by-Step Solution: Write 17 as two digits: tens digit 1 and units digit 7. Observe that 71 has tens digit 7 and units digit 1, so the digits are reversed. Apply the same operation to 35: tens digit 3 and units digit 5. Reverse the order of digits so that the tens digit becomes 5 and the units digit becomes 3. Combine the digits to obtain 53 and choose it from the options. Verification / Alternative check: Check whether any other option could plausibly follow from simple reversal. 56 would be formed from 65, not from 35. The number 60 would need a zero as the units digit, which is not present in 35. 69 would need digits 6 and 9; again, they do not match 3 and 5. The number 44 has identical digits and cannot be produced by reversing 35. Thus 53 is the unique number that exactly parallels the transformation applied to 17. Why Other Options Are Wrong: The incorrect options do not maintain the simple digit reversal rule that clearly exists between 17 and 71. They either change the values of the digits or introduce new digits that were not present in the original number. Since an analogy must preserve the type of transformation across both pairs, these choices cannot be correct. Common Pitfalls: Sometimes test takers look for more complex patterns, like adding a fixed number or reversing and then adding, when the question only requires a basic operation. Another trap is to misread 71 as 17 plus 54 or some other arithmetic relation. Always check whether a simpler explanation such as digit reversal fits the given pair before considering more complicated ideas. Final Answer: Following the reverse digit pattern, 35 becomes 53, so the analogy is "17 : 71 :: 35 : 53".

Question 19

In the part–whole analogy "Room : house :: needle : ____", which option forms a similar relationship?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This analogy focuses on the relationship between a part and the whole object to which that part belongs. In the pair "Room : house", a room is one component or section inside a larger structure, the house. You are asked to select from the options another pair that follows the same part to whole relationship. Recognising such structural associations is a key element of verbal reasoning. Given Data / Assumptions: A room is a part of a house. We are looking for a smaller component and the larger object that contains it. Options include pairs relating to actions, roles and mechanical relations. Exactly one option must mirror the part–whole structure of the original pair. Concept / Approach: First, clarify the type of relationship in the example. Room is not a user of the house, nor an action; it is a physical subunit. The whole building is made up of several rooms. Therefore, for the correct option we need an item that is physically contained in or fixed to the second item, which acts as its larger environment. A clock often has a needle or hand, which points to the time. The needle is a visible part of the clock mechanism. Thus, "needle : clock" matches the part–whole relationship that "room : house" expresses. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify that room is a small component inside a house, representing a part–whole relationship. Reject pairs that express different types of relations, such as action or usage. Examine "Pedal : rotate" and notice that rotate is an action, not a container for the pedal. Observe that "Student : study" is a doer and an activity, again not part–whole. See that "Car : steering" reverses roles and places the whole before a part, while "needle : clock" keeps the part before the whole, matching the original order. Verification / Alternative check: Check "Car : steering". Steering is indeed a part of a car, but the order is whole to part, which is opposite to "room : house". The analogy requires part first, whole second. "Driver : vehicle" is a person operating a machine, which is a different relationship. Only "needle : clock" shows a part first and the whole device second, preserving both the structure and direction of the original pair. Why Other Options Are Wrong: "Pedal : rotate" combines a mechanical component with an action, not a container. "Student : study" links a person to an activity. "Car : steering" is whole to part instead of part to whole. "Driver : vehicle" describes a user and the object used. None of these parallels the structural part–whole pattern of "room : house". Therefore they must be rejected. Common Pitfalls: Candidates sometimes focus only on the presence of any part and whole words, ignoring order. Others may pick a pair that feels intuitively related without checking that it is the same type of relationship. When solving analogies, always confirm both the nature and direction of the relation before choosing an answer. Final Answer: The part–whole analogy is correctly continued by "Room : house :: needle : clock".

Question 20

In the number analogy "59 : 62 :: 66 : ____", which number follows the same rule as the first pair?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This numerical analogy checks whether you can identify a constant difference between two numbers and then apply that difference to a new number. In the pair "59 : 62", the second number is slightly larger than the first. You must determine exactly how much has been added and then use the same increment with 66 to select the correct answer from the options. Given Data / Assumptions: First pair: 59 is related to 62. Second pair: 66 is related to an unknown number. Options: 67, 71, 69, 70 and 73. We expect a simple addition pattern, not a complex function. Concept / Approach: Calculate the difference between 62 and 59. Subtract 59 from 62: 62 - 59 = 3. This indicates a rule where the second number equals the first number plus 3. To follow the same pattern, we must add 3 to 66. Doing this gives 66 + 3 = 69. Therefore, 69 is the number that correctly fits the analogy and should be chosen from the alternatives. Step-by-Step Solution: Compute 62 - 59 to find the increment in the first pair. The result is 3. State the discovered rule: second number = first number + 3. Apply this rule to 66. Calculate 66 + 3 and obtain 69. Scan the options for 69. Select 69 as it exactly matches the applied rule. Verification / Alternative check: Test other options briefly to confirm. If we choose 67, we would be adding only 1 to 66, which does not match the first pair. Choosing 70 involves adding 4, and 71 involves adding 5. Choosing 73 would mean adding 7. None of these increments match the constant addition of 3 observed between 59 and 62. Hence, 69 is the only number that preserves the same relationship. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Options 67, 70, 71 and 73 each require different additions that are inconsistent with the initial pair. Analogy questions require one single rule that can be applied to both pairs without change. Using any increment other than 3 would break this requirement, so those options cannot be correct. Common Pitfalls: Sometimes candidates try to see more complicated patterns, such as alternating addition and subtraction or prime number gaps, when a simple constant difference is sufficient. Another pitfall is miscalculating the difference in the first pair. Carefully subtracting the smaller number from the larger always clarifies the true pattern. Final Answer: By adding 3 to each first number, 59 maps to 62 and 66 maps to 69, completing the analogy "59 : 62 :: 66 : 69".

Analogy Questions

Questions

Practice smarter